Slashdot Mirror


Intel to Drop Low-end Chipsets

SimilarityEngine writes "Intel is planning to terminate production of its 910GL, 915GL and 915PL chipsets by the end of August, as part of a shift in focus towards higher-spec products, possibly with support for new FSB architectures, multi-core processors and a host of other much-requested features relating to virtualisation and security."

14 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Now when you say "security" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you mean "security for the end user" or "security for Microsoft, to keep the end user from doing things which Microsoft does not want them to"?

    1. Re:Now when you say "security" by TCaM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are talking about the former, while thinking about the latter.

  2. Re:Trusted computing? by KillShill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    simple, whenever there is mention of "security", they're talking about TCPA/DRM/Insidious computing.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  3. Its all about the Benjies by BigMFC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't believe that the margins are worthwhile at all on the lower end chipsets. Sis/AMD/VIA provide really stiff competition in that arena... Its a sensible move on Intels part

  4. Why doesnt the summary mention... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that intels chipset fab are at their limit and they are simply dropping their lowest margin products?
    (its even in the article)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Why doesnt the summary mention... by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple, because Slashdot gains readership through controversy. While a great deal of the subjects posted is warranted for controversy, this issue does not given the obvious as you so mentioned.

      Where is the honor and dignity of journalism these days?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  5. Re:When for a general purpose mainboard and chipse by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get rid of the "throw-away" atmosphere, and build some dignity in the market that products will keep their value. Only a shithole like China would think of such a bad idea, as buy-once throw-away computer hardware; because China values life of the people as verry cheap and replacable, just like the products they export.

    It's not the Chinese throwing away perfectly good computers... it's the US. The Chinese just make what the US demands. By contrast, Chinese culture is such that people tend to use all kinds of things until they fall apart. I don't know where you get the idea that China is a "throw away" economy, and the US isn't.

    Hell, I'm thrilled about this announcement, and every hardware "upgrade" announcement. I don't buy into the consumer culture, so all of our PC's come from the local thrift shop (generally $25 for a PC, $100 for a 17" monitor). This just means more stupid Americans throwing away perfectly good machines that I can snap up for peanuts. Schweet!

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  6. Re:A very large, empty market. by 42Penguins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the biggest of one of the only 2 consumer processor manufacturers drops production on low-end processors, who are people going to buy low-end processors from? Most people don't even know who AMD is.

    Sorry, but...
    They're phasing out chipsets, not processors.
    There's still Sis, Via, and all that good stuff in that market.

  7. Intel is Low End by krakrjak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Except for the Itanium2 which is sort of a running joke, everything Intel has out there right now is low end. The only great product they have on the market is the Pentium-M. Their Dual-Core is a joke, both in architecture and in heat/power consumption. IF you compare AMD's current products (Opteron x65/70/75 line and the Dual Core 64's) to intel's best offerings, there is no comparison AMD wins hands down in almost all categories. The categories that matter to me there is not a real choice AMD runs away with it.

    Also has anyone gotten SLI mode to work for a workstation on an Intel platform? Last time I saw it attempted it couldn't be done reliably, at least not with Nvidia's solution. I wan't my servers to use the least amount of power, put out the least amount of heat, have the smallest footprint possible and have excellent performance. I can balance those with Dual Core Opterons and get something that comes in a great package. IBM/SUN/HP all sell those types of servers and Intel just can't touch them.

  8. Re:Reminds me of GM/Ford/Chrysler by Zackbass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a reason that the American auto industry in such a bad situation now and it doesn't have anything to do with low margin vehicles.

    The big American car companies can't engineer themselves out of a paper bag.

    That's all. There's no excusable reason why a Ford should be expected to need serious repairs at half the milage of a Toyota of the same price. That, and the Toyota will have a better fit and finish. The only reason the citadel has been breached is because the domestic manufacturers tore down the walls and make it into a crackhouse.

    --
    You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
  9. Re:A very large, empty market. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People who don't know AMD are also probably the people who listen to whatever the Bestbuy salesmen tell them, and are convinved they need the latest and greatest PC out there to run IE.

  10. Not quite true... by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is actually just a phase out of older chips. A year ago Intel did the same with their "low end" 865 chipsets. At the time, 865 wasn't really low end.

    I am a little surprised CNet spun a regularly scheduled product cycle into "Intel pulling out of the low end market". What about their 945P/G chipsets? Aren't they launching a low end 945GZ chipset in the next few months as well to replace 915P/G? Little details that don't make for very interesting headlines I suppose....

    HJ

  11. ...and why doesn't the article mention 945GZ/PL? by MojoStan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The CNET article doesn't even mention the upcoming Intel chipsets (945GZ and 945PL) that are supposed to replace the current low-end chipsets that are being phased out, according to a July 12 DigiTimes article:
    • 945GZ: GMA 950 graphics w/o PCI Express x16 slot. Replaces 910GL and 915GL. Samples being delivered to motherboard makers in late July. Volume shipments in 4Q05 or 1Q06.
    • 945PL: Low-end version of 945P. Replaces 915PL. Samples delivering July or August. Volume shipments in September 2005.

    From the CNET News.com article:

    The move, expected to take place by the end of August, could delay shipments of low-end PCs from various manufacturers for a couple of months.

    Sources close to the chipmaking giant's dealings confirmed reports that Intel would shutter production of its 910GL, 915GL and 915PL chipsets.

    Does CNET even know about 945GZ and 945PL? The article seems to be implying that, after the current low-end chipsets are phased out, Intel will exit the low-end chipset business. Are 945GZ and 945PL being cancelled? If not, will supplies of current low-end chipsets run out months before 945GV and 945PL ship in volume?
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  12. Supply Problems... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is the /. mantra that AMD has supply problems, while Intel supposedly has excess capacity? This story outlines Intel's current shortages, even though the PR guy spun it like it's just a regular occurance...

    Why do stories about Intel opening a new fab get posted to /. numerous times, while stories about AMD opening a new fab don't even get a mention?

    I get the feeling this story wouldn't be here if the submitter had made it about Intel's supply problems, rather than the retirement of a few low-end chips?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant