Cisco Going Mobile, Acquiring Nokia?
Keruo writes "Sunday Business paper is reporting on its latest issue that Cisco Systems is considering of acquiring some large player in the mobile telephone field. According to a Reuters article the paper also suggests that the company is most likely Nokia. Neither of the companies have yet commented on the rumour." From the article: "Cisco's mainstay networking market was fast changing with the convergence of fixed-line and wireless networks, and Cisco needed a merger to acquire the technology to create intelligent wireless applications, which Finnish-based Nokia could provide."
This would be their first really big acquisition in a long time, perhaps a bit too big for them?
This article has no real content as the source of the information is unrevealed and both companies refused to comment. The real story is that large corporations have departments that work on plausible mergers/acquisitions day and night on future moves. They create possible mergers day and night, and will continue to do so after this. Without actual information, this article is fluff at best. The intresting part is the effects of this merger upon the technological fields.
This seems to be a story that started out from a single source. All the articles in Google news seem to quote each other and none of them seem to know where the original reference is (probably some analyst has started it as a way to boost his holdings). Now Reuters has picked it up. Excpect some nice trading on Monday when first Helsinki stock exchange and NASDAQ later open up. Then everyone forgets about this two days later.
I couldn't find any data on what these companies are WORTH to see how easily Cisco could acquire Nokia, but Nokia revenues for 2004 were at 29.3 billion euro whilst Cisco revenues were at 22 billion euro. I am not exactly sure Cisco could swallow Nokia and not choke on it big time.
And all because Mike Wynn has a nokia phone - I think this attempt at silencing him has gotten a little out of hand.
Actually, I'd believe more the other way around...
Other than just becomming a conglomerate, I don't see much point. Wireless like Nokia does and network like Cisco does are just too different at this point. So unless they were going to use it for a big push at becomming the dominate VOIP provider (hardware wise), I can't really see it. This could endup as another AOL/TimeWarner in some ways.
That said, it doesn't make that much difference to me. If they can get Sprint (my cell provider) to carry Nokia/Cisco phones (un-crippled) then I'll be happy. Otherwise it won't mean that much to me personally.
But what would we call them? Nisco? Cikia? Nokisco? Just don't see a good name. Not like Squeenix (Square-Enix, or at least as I like to call 'em because it sounds better).
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
We cannot see how this wouldn't work. Think of the synergies and the long-term return on shareholder equity.
It's a cinch that this deal will produce unflappable results.
Sincerely,
AOL and Time-Warner
Nokia's chief of corporate communications Arja Suominen denies the news as unsupported speculation according the Finnish Broadcasting Company YLE.
Nokia has this image as "king of the wireless" but in fact this has been slipping in the last couple of years as their primary product (handset) has been under threat of commoditisation by many other vendors primarily Far-Eastern.
To their credit Nokia saw this coming a long time ago and have strenuously tried to diversify into (a) server-side systems for mobile e.g. specialised mobile groupware and (b) network infrastructure with a security highlight such as dedicated (BSD) firewall boxes and VPN systems.
So maybe they do have something attractive for Cisco and might even view it as a merger.
Trivia: Nokia invented the first non-black Wellington Boot.
"Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
When cisco acquired linksys, build quality went down the pan. My pre-cicso equipment is solid stuff, built to last. The WRT54G I've got now feels flimsy and from what I've heard from other users is pretty prone to damage.
I'd rather this doesn't happen, as at the moment Nokia is an excellent company that doesn't need messing around with.
They'll just offer Cisco stock or something. You are right in saying that it is next to impossible for them to raise $70 billion in cash.
Sivaram Velauthapillai
Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places
LOL AOL,
sincerly,
HP and Compaq
Compaq and DEC
signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
Well I guess the interface may change a bit, for example adding a name to my address book: Phone# configure terminal Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Phone(config)# alias exec callbob dial phone.device.213.555.1212 Phone(config)# end Phone# callbob? *callbob="dial phone.device.213.555.1212"
They'll just offer Cisco stock or something.
Cisco's float is virtually 100%, they don't have any treasury stock they can issue. That is, Cisco doesn't own any Cisco shares to play with. Unless they dilute the current shareholder's stock -- by creating new shares in the joint company to be given to Nokia shareholders -- Cisco doesn't have that many options other than an LBO.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
I'm willing to bet that the 7920 wireless phones we use in our office are made by Nokia:
Check them out here.
Maybe Cisco wants to push their wireless VOIP to the next level. It makes sense. Imagine every Nokia product being 802.11 VOIP capable right out of the box.
-ted
Nokia, a company that used to make great hardware that has now completely lost the plot insofar as hardware goes.
A merger seems like the natural thing to do at this point.
I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.