BitTorrent for Content Providers
snuvlorgin writes "ibiblio.org has entered the fray,
launching an enhanced BitTorrent site.
Among the torrent offerings (all legal) are
Linux kernels, distros, Project Gutenberg texts,
and the
ibiblio Speaker
Series, which includes videos of talks by Larry Lessig, Robin Miller, and Dan Gillmor. ibiblio developed and open sourced the Osprey and Permaseed software to make BitTorrent seeding reliable, persistent, and suitable for large-scale content providers. Yes, you can find these torrents later."
Great idea. It legitimizes BitTorrent as a protocol and it makes find some great content easy. Torrents On!
Thalasar
Hopefully with this companies will start to use BT as an alternative to http/ftp. The downside is that you have to have a client, but I bet that browsers will have integrated BT support soon (the new Opera does, FF has a plugin). And the savings for the server range from a LOT to none, and even none can't hurt, since if nothing else you at least have a great download client able to resume downloads, download huge files, etc.
Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
Excellent, now maybe stupid Radford University will stop blocking ports 6800-6900. Seriously, BitTorrent needs all the legitimate support it can get if it is not to be grouped together with "illegitimate P2P traffic"
--
Fairfax Underground: Public message board for residents of Fairfax County, VA
Why wouldn't you just change the port you're using?
Finally, a Slashdotting that's a good thing.
Ibiblio also hosts the streaming audio for a number of NC public and student radio stations. It is a great service, and if bittorrent can reduce a bit of its server load so it can do even more, great!
Ibiblio is the former sunsite, and has been a major contributor to the Internet for years.
Just in case Peachy's discouraged anyone from trying to submit their homebrew distrobution to Ibiblio.
From Ibiblio.org
---------------
Contributing to ibiblio.org
If you are interested in becoming an ibiblio.org contributor:
1. Read the Collection Criteria to see if your interest will be served by working with us
2. Check out the services we offer contributors to see if we have what you need.
3. Hint: very few, if any, proprietary services will be provided, but many open source solutions are, can or will be offered on request.
4. Drop a note to help@ibiblio.org telling us:
* What your project will be
* What services you might wish to use
* How to contact you by phone (so we can work out any details and passwords)
* Anything else you think might be helpful
---------------
One of the main things to be considered is keeping things up to date and making some sort of contribution to the public. It (should) be a given that the bigger distros will be properly maintained, as a good homebrew distro should, but a homebrew which is only a minor modification to an existing distro may not make the cut. If you've got a great modification, maybe you should see if it's more practical to distribute the modified packages instead of an entire distro.
"Common sense will be the death of us all"
I am sick to death of waiting for fileplanet/etc downloads. Or the dreaded "Sorry there are already 500 users logged into this ftp server. Im like, dude... wheres the torrent???
I would like to see the scientific journals, especially The Public Library of Science (PLoS) http://www.plos.org/ start distributing their montly publications over Bit Torrent. There have been occasions of downloading their 150mb journals where there servers and bandwidth were clearly overwhelmed. It would, in my opnion, be a great front to publicize excellent and FREE scientific articles as well as popularize and legitmize bit torrent as a cost effective and fast way to distribute content.
Anthropology.net - Beyond bones and stones.
My personal experiences suggest that a well seeded torrent downloads much faster than an equivilent http download.
For whatever reason i struggle to max out my 3MB pipe from anywhere but the fastest servers, yet with bittorrent i can get damn close on most transfers.
The biggest hinderence (that i see) to bittorrent is that you need to have a listner port open for good performance.
Find some things like:
Clifford Lynch: Speech on Scholarly Communications
And write a friendly note to your IT staff explaining that you seem to be having trouble getting it, apparently because the ports are blocked. Explain that it is relavent academic material that you need to consult. (Try to find something specific to your major, and with an academic title.) Whenever you run across something like this that has legitimate scholarly merit that is relevant to your courseload, write another friendly note explaining how you need access to it.
Don't be abuse, don't be whiny, don't try to convince them you are smart or well informed. Policy is never decided by such a pissing contest. You would just be ignored. Just make polite, courteous explanations that you need legitimate access to specific resources.
They may or may not decide that the benefits outweigh the trouble. In this case, try to find a proxy to pass through...
Thanks for your support! I can tell you it feels just as great working there.
resurrect my
Where I work bittorrent is classified as a Peer to Peer software in the same grouping as Kazza, Morpheus, ect....so the offical policy is that you are not allowed to use bittorrent FOR ANYTHING unless you have permission from the CIO.
On an upside those that have broken the rules are people who were downloading LINUX distros and no action was taken.
My point being I REALLY hope that bittorrent becomes an offical specified file transfer protocol. It might seperate it from the rest of the peer to peer crap that's tarnishing bittorrents legitimate use.
If you want a CLI tool for seeding, you could try libTorrent. It works great, uses little memory and is free
It's not immediately obvious, but S=seeds, P=peers, and PS=permaseeds. The key is that torrents don't go seedless when there are zero regular seeds. A permaseed keeps the torrent alive.