Slashdot Mirror


Ogg Vorbis Share Reaches 12.3% on P2P Traffic

prostoalex writes "According to CacheLogic survey, 61.44% of the peer-to-peer traffic nowadays is video, with audio taking distant second place, representing 11.34% of global traffic. Moreover, 12.3% of all the music files traded on P2P networks are in Ogg format. Almost all of the OGG files are traded via BitTorrent protocol with most of the growth coming from Asia, CacheLogic says."

23 of 450 comments (clear)

  1. Nice misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    12.3% of MUSIC transfers, which is 11.34% of all traffic -- so Ogg makes up 1.4% of all P2P traffic. Which ain't bad at all, but is nowhere near 12.3

    1. Re:Nice misleading title by joebutton · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Yeah, not many people download movies in OGG
      > format, and the ones that do probably spend a lot
      > of time trying to figure out why the sound works
      > perfectly but the picture is so garbled.

      Actually ogg is a container format which can contain both sound and video. Vorbis is the audio format.

  2. Re:Slightly OT by vonstauf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not being at my desktop because I'm fair away in cube land, I can atleast attest that my XMMS player that came stock with Slackware seems to do just fine with the equalizer and ogg files. I'll test it out when I get back to the bat cave. This bug seems to be what you're dealing with. Here are some comments about it.

    --
    " Yesterday upon the stair I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today. I wish that man would go away."
  3. PhatNoise by GianlucaM · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to PhatNoise (PhatNoise.com) the latest firmware revision for their PhatBox supports OGG Vorbis up to 192kbps. You have to email them to get that information, because it's nowhere onthe site. I'm tempted to buy one.

  4. Re:OGG by rm999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I think the LAME programmers proved you wrong, because as I understand it they haven't paid a penny to the creators of MP3 :)

    But I get your point

  5. Re:Ogg Vorbis Popularity by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rip your CDs to FLAC instead for archiving, then transcode them to whatever lossy format you prefer when you need to put them on a portable device.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. Re:Slightly OT by vonstauf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reading through the buglist comments, I must be on crack...or I might have some mp3 files. ;)

    --
    " Yesterday upon the stair I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today. I wish that man would go away."
  7. Re:Great by stuuf · · Score: 3, Informative

    You know, the article only mentioned the "Ogg [contianer] file format," and the submitter had no reason to insert "vorbis," so some of it might be Ogg/FLAC. Could even be theora video, which would make the assertion that 12% of the "audio" traffic is ogg... we've long ago collectively learned that AVI is a container not a compression scheme, so can we start using the right terminology for Ogg now?

    --

    Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

  8. Re:Downloading Garbage by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    --
    make install -not war

  9. Re:Slightly OT by k8to · · Score: 2, Informative

    To most listeners, mp3 files become transparent somewhere around 192kb/s, wheras for most listeners ogg/vorbis becomes transparent at around 160kb/s. So assuming a good encoder, you won't "hear" mp3 at that bitrate, and also won't "hear" ogg.

    However, if you drop to around 160kb/s, you will 'hear' mp3, but will still not 'hear' ogg.

    That's the bitrate story.

    For what it's worth, the design of vorbis provides room for further improvment, so the situation may be different in the future, but there isn't a lot of significant work going on at the moment.

    --
    -josh
  10. Re:Slightly OT by flithm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get yourself a real equalizer for xmms.

    I was in the same boat as you (except with FLAC instead of OGG). EQU freakin' OWNS all over the place. You have no idea how good music can sound until you've tried this thing out. 31 bands!?. Of course you can do fewer bands if you want.

  11. Re:Slightly OT by k8to · · Score: 3, Informative

    Despite your claims to the contrary, bitrates below 256kb/s are still regularly used. Perhaps not by you, or your friends, but they are used for a variety of applications, including portable replay, network streaming, and so on.

    For most listeners, the quality achieved by 256kb/s mp3 can be achieved at around 192kb/s with quality encoders such as LAME. That is, at this bitrate, the decoded material is indistinguishable from the original source by most (the majority of) listeners. This has been confirmed by a number of independent blind tests. Note that this is not universal for all listeners nor all source material, but it is generally found to be true. For these reasons, some people place their trust in psychoacoustic models to automatically choose a rate, or they add a "headroom" and pick a value like 256, as you state.

    Comparably, ogg vorbis tends to achieve general transparency at around 160kb/s as compared to mp3. Again this is of course not for all listeners and all source material, but for the significant majority. I personally encode my music at -q 6 which tends to result in files of around 150 to 180 kbps, the encoder decides what is necessary from moment to moment.

    Of course, modern AAC (and I say modern because the AAC format has been extended over time) seems to be able to achieve transparency at even lower bitrates, but less extensive tests have been done, so a precise number is hard to quote. However, Ogg/Vorbis has another significant benefit, in that it does not contain, or claims not to contain, any patented algorithms or technology, which is of real benefit to a variety of players including companies who wish to provide content in lossy formats, and companies who wish to provide players of lossy formats. Generally, individual do not see direct benefits of these issues, but avoiding of patent licenses should ultimate lower fees and increase competition among providers of both devices and content, and thus will result in greater choice and lower costs to end users, which should be of benefit to them.

    Thus, in essence, ogg sits in a middling position in absolute quality, but holds a promise of improving the overall marketplace for all players, and using and supporting the format may bring about long range benefits to yourself.

    --
    -josh
  12. Re:Portable music players by isolationism · · Score: 4, Informative
    Plenty of the iRiver and Samsung offerings support it. My 1GB samsung YP-T6 is (slightly) smaller than a Shuffle, has a screen and more than 2 play modes, an FM tuner, a mic and line in with direct encoding capability (128kbps, but good enough for dictating notes etc.) and plays MP3, WMA, and OGG just fine. It also connects to Windows and Linux as a regular mass-storage device and so doesn't require iTunes or any of its open-source alternatives.

    It's a pity OGG support isn't more wide-spread, and worse still that lots of people bitch about wanting mp3s, completely oblivious to the closed-source brick wall the "next generation" of mp3 formats is going to present. I naturally will be smug with my OGG-playing YP-T6 and EPIA running Linux/Freevo as a set-top multimedia player.

  13. Re:Ogg Vorbis faces a challenge of intertia by RiffRafff · · Score: 2, Informative

    So I went around looking for what could play it. Only a few pieces of software (winamp and xmms were the two I cared about) and zero hardware.

    Zero hardware? Not so. Cowen/JetAudio's iAudio, iRiver, MPIO, Rio, IOPS, Samsung, Neuros, ISM; all offer Ogg Vorbis-capable players.

    In addition, many Symbian phones can use OggPlay to playback Ogg files.

    Also, current versions of WinAmp handle Ogg, and there's plug-ins for the older versions. Xmms has always handled Ogg, IIRC.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
  14. Re:Downloading Garbage by Hawke666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If by "pay" you mean "download for free". http://magnatune.com/info/openmusic

  15. Re:But does anybody use Theora yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This practice is very common for Anime, since the OGG container can handle subtitles and multiple audio streams (The more common AVI cannot), and there are very strong preferences for both subtitled and dubbed translations.

  16. Re:Apple iPod OGG position by r_benchley · · Score: 2, Informative
    That link does not contain great info. Two days after it was posted at Gizmodo, there was a rebuttal that was posted: http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/ogg-vorbis-on-ipod -a-rebuttal-015738.php/
    First off, the original iPod does indeed have the horsepower for Ogg
    The rebuttaal was written by Monty from xiph.org. Monty is he author of the Tremor codec and OGG itself. I agree that Apple should offer support for OGG Vorbis on the iPod, or allow a third party to add support, because choice is a good thing. However, there is no technical reason that the iPod would be unable to play OGG Vorbis files.
  17. Re:Portable music players by ldpercy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought the same player a few days ago and while i'm enjoying it, some of my ogg files can cause the player to freeze.
    There's a bit of a discussion of the problem over at the Xiph wiki: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Talk:PortablePlayer s#Samsung.27s_Yepp_Ogg_Vorbis_support Have you had any of same problems?

  18. Re:Mass Converter for Windows? by croddy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Your claim that there is a "substantial" loss indicates that you have never transcoded from one lossy format to another.

    Yes, of course -- there is a loss of quality. But the difference when going from LAME standard to Vorbis Q5, for example, is something more accurately described as "barely noticeable" or "reasonably insignificant".

    Certainly, if you frequently transcode your files from one lossy format to another, you will begin to notice artifacts. But the losses from a single transcoding are so slight that it is quite often worth it for some added convenience.

  19. Re:Ogg Vorbis faces a challenge of intertia by Knackered · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neither the QT components, nor Jordy Mendelson's updated version work properly in QT 6.5, and they crash QT 7 (on MacOS X).

    Here's the reason why:

    http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=deta il&aid=1144430&group_id=41359&atid=430388

    Nobody has yet fixed them, so Ogg Vorbis is not an option under iTunes currently.

    --
    a.
  20. Ogg or Ogg Vorbis? by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA doesn't say Ogg Vorbis anywhere. It says Ogg. For all we know, that's 99% Ogg Speex files (i.e. audiobooks or other recorded voice) and 1% Ogg Vorbis. Or it could be the other way around. We don't know because the article doesn't say. The claim that it's Ogg Vorbis is completely fabricated by the Slashdot submitter.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  21. Re:Portable music players by caluml · · Score: 2, Informative
  22. Re:Downloading Garbage by taxevader · · Score: 2, Informative

    " Off hand, i'd say a lot? Ayu, Hikki, all the idol singers, etc have a large circulation. Not to mention cpop and kpop like BoA with followings all over. "

    What you fail to mention is that all these acts copy exactly what the NA crap machine spewed out 6 months ago. Whatever Britney does, expect the local manufactured singer/band to do, albeit a few month later.

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.