Slashdot Mirror


Warming Up Mars With Greenhouse Gases

fembots writes "Scientists are thinking of using the same toxic stuff (Octafluoropropane) already blamed for global warming here to put some life back on Mars. It would take hundreds of years but eventually ice sheets would melt, grass would grow here, and temperatures would hit 50 degrees along the equator of the planet. Martian organisms might be revived too - if there are any."

13 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. SimEarth by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember the game SimEarth had you do something like this in order to make it livable. Of course, I nuked everything that moved, but that was a different story. Why are we trying to terraform mars?

    1. Re:SimEarth by innerweb · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Providing an atmosphere is nice, but will not make Mars *liveable*. The bigger concern is the lack of a radiation shield like Earth. Even if the people live in safe housing, plants and crops would be hard to cover in large enough quantities to be useable. The magnetic field surrounding the Earth and the ozone layer do protect us (mostly) from the harmful radiations of space (our Sun and others).

      How are we going to protect Mars form that? Until we figure out a way to do that, the rest is rather useless (on Mars). How are we going to increase the gravity of Mars to prevent the Atmosphere from leaking off very fast? True, it will take a long time in our standards, but how much can be leaked off before it is not useable again?

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
  2. So how is there now by Quirk · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It would take hundreds of years but eventually ice sheets would melt, grass would grow here,

    One has to assume you're there, quite the feat; and, let me be the first to say, I welcome our grass growing, and smoking, Martian Overlords.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  3. Re:This is fawked. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...planet several thousand miles away"

    I might agree with spending a little more money on education.

  4. In related news by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....250 years ago Bwizopp Gnis'uen, a famous martian scientist came up with an idea how to colonize that cold blue planet.

    "This great plan will allow us to finally colonize that pesky blue planet and in the meantime allows us to get rid of that ape infestation over there.

    It would be hugely expensive to invade, so the brilliance of the plan is to let those apes do it for us. They will never suspect a thing.

    All we have to do is to tell them about the huge reserves of so called "oil" in the ground. The timing is crucial, because if we would tell them too late, they would discover a much easier way to generate energy. That would be a disaster, but it won't happen. When they realise what's going on it will be too late already."

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  5. Re:What if they like to eat humans? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do we really want to wake up the Martian Organisms?

    In all likelyhood, if Mars has microscopic life, the Earth has probably already been infected with it. Calculations show that spores can survive certain meteor impacts and be transported to Earth in the process. Our life may have even originated on Mars. Earth was too valcanic for stable life formation early on, but due to its smaller size Mars may have been mild and wet at that time. Thus, life may have formed on Mars while Earth was still bubbling, but the roles switched later on and Earth did "more" with the stolen life when Mars cooled and dried out.

  6. Toxicity of OFP by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Octafluoropropane is not really all that toxic.

    According to the MSDS (Material Saftey Data Sheet), the only real toxicity to worry about is asphyxiation, no worse than nitrogen or argon gas.

    Greenhouse gases != toxic (at least not implicity).

    MSDS link
    http://www.scottecatalog.com/msds.nsf/d118573c489f 39cc852569af00702e6f/26e5bede95a1fefb85256ef50045e 0e4?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,76-19-7

  7. Journalists Garble The Facts As Usual by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...toxic stuff (Octafluoropropane)...
    It isn't toxic. Here's the MSDS .
    ...already blamed for global warming...
    And it isn't to blame for global warming: there isn't enough of it released to matter. CO2 is to blame for global warming.
    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  8. Go visit Africa by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Offer yourself to the lions. After all, they're natural and wouldn't dream of hurting another living creature would they?

    Guess what. It's survival of the fittest.

    --
    Deleted
  9. Re:50 degrees? by colonic · · Score: 5, Funny
    After going through a -40F streak in Northern Minnesota

    I think you meant -40C... :-)

  10. Dr. Erik Clacey's Study by laodamas · · Score: 5, Informative

    The idea is to initiate a run-away greenhouse effect on Mars using a super-effective Greenhouse gas that is safe and easy to produce on Mars. 10-20*10^9 Kg of C2F8, a greenhouse gas 12,000 more effective than CO2, would seem to do the trick. Assuming that 10% of all sunlight reaching Mars could be trapped, Mars could be warmed enough to reach the triple point of CO2 within 100 years. This would release the CO2 (and hopefully water) frozen within the Martian Regolith into the atmosphere and possibly add enough atmosphere to allow for human exploration with only an oxygen mask a few yars later. At this point martian life, if it does exist, should flourish. If it does not we can start populating the planet with Earth species without nasty Mars life preservation debates.

    This is not an easy process. Our CFCs, in the Martian atmosphere, would last for thousands of years, so VERY careful monitoring would be required in order to prevent us from terraforming a Venus.

    Mars does not have a magnetosphere so our terraformed atmosphere would only have a life of about ten million years before evaporating.

    I have notes of the ongoing Mars Society Conference here if you want more information on the current state of manned Mars exploration.

  11. Re:Sustainable? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if Mars is tectonically dead, then this would be an advantage for building bases INSIDE the planet.

    Put large fields of solar panels and wind turbines on the surface for power, and bring everything you need for indoor hydroponics.

    It would be feasible (although not cheap) and faster than terraforming.

    I bet that if you look around Mount Olympus, you could find large cave systems that can be used as a starting point.

  12. From Margarita Marinova herself by pauljlucas · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I had the same question, so I e-mailed her. Here's my question:
    So even if you add more of an atmosphere to Mars, what would prevent it from leaking off into space just like it's already done to get Mars into the state it's in now? Due to Mars' lack of a magnetic field, the solar wind would just strip away the atmosphere.
    Within minutes, I got a reply from her:
    Hi Paul,

    you're right, even if we thicken Mars' atmosphere, it will eventually disappear again. The lack of magnetic field is probably not the biggest problem (it's likely to have been more of a problem in the past when the solar wind was likely stronger), but you would definitely have the formation of Carbonates in the newly formed lakes and rivers that would take sequester the CO2.

    The important point here though is timescales. If people really wanted to do it, terraforming (at least the first stages) could definitely be accomplished in about 100 years. That's a reasonable timescale in the life of humans. The disappearance of the Mars atmosphere, on the other hand, would take *at least* millions, and probably tens of millions, of years. That timescale is much longer than human experience and therefore I would argue is not that important. We are going to be so different in a million years, with such totally different capabilities and needs, that the fact that Mars will then again become inhabitable I think is unimportant.

    Margarita.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.