Slashdot Mirror


Space Meat Coming to your Kitchen

jdray writes "Australia's GizMag is running an article about the industrialization of a NASA-tested concept for artificially creating meat. The article mentions meat makers as home appliances. Carne-Matic aside, this sounds like a mixed blessing, and brings about visions of some sterile, Spandex-jumpsuit future where food production is controlled by some central authority, and real, hoof-grown meat is a rare delicacy. Remember, Soylent Green is people!" You can read a curiously familiar Slashdot story from a month ago too.

9 of 854 comments (clear)

  1. Whats with the Spin by imsabbel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    of the summary? If it tastes the same, i would have zero problems with artificial meat.
    I dont actually enjoy having animals slaughtered just for fun.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  2. w00t! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the future, I see no more grissle or stringy bits of fat etc. Cheapest meat will taste like the best eye fillet you can buy, and nothing had to die.

    1. Re:w00t! by njfuzzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, just like artificial sweeteners taste like the finest quality cane sugar or honey. Truly an age of marvels we live in.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:w00t! by Xugumad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's because they're something which is meant to be like sugar, but are explicitely not sugar. Unless I'm missing something here, this should be like real meat, except without any of the complexity of having to be an animal. I think the biggest risk is that it will lack variety...

  3. I'm curious by Minwee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where exactly did you get the idea that the meat you were eating now was somehow natural?

  4. Re:As a borderline vegan, by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great insight. As an unreconstructed carnivore, I've got some ignorant comments to make :)

    While the attitude you describe may hold true for pre-existing vegan and vegetarian folk, I wonder if we would see a sharp decline in the ranks of 'new converts'. Pure speculation of course, but if the ethical difficulty becomes basically theoretical rather than actual, I doubt that many people would feel compelled to change their eating habits.

  5. Re:i'll second that by SlamMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean kind of like how vegetables?

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  6. Re:i'll second that by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Remember, cow muscle evolved to move the cow around, not to feed people.

    Not true. Mankind has been selectively breeding cattle for thousands of years. In that time we have literally bred them to be tasty. I remember seeing a while back a bit on CNN about cattler farmers using Ultrasound to measure the fat content and muscle mass of steer so they can tell who to stud before having to breed them, raise the offspring, then slaughter the offspring to get the information.

    You also suffer from the falicy that any biomass is intended to be food. With the exception of milk and fruit, everything we eat was a creature or plant that had other ideas.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  7. Re:You Insensitive Clod!... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd be interested in hearing what ethical vegetarians think about eating cruelty-free meat.

    Your labels need refining. There are "ethical vegetarians" who don't eat meat because they are concerned about the unethical treatment of the animals. Most of these people have no problem eating meat raised on a traditional farm and slaughtered humanely or wild game killed in an ethical fashion. I don't see why they would have any problem eating this type of meat.

    There are people who have an ethical problem with the killing of animals that trust them, or the killing of animals who trust their slaughterers on their behalf. These people are usually willing to eat wild game, or animals raised in a way in which the animals are not taught to trust the farmers. I imagine they would have no problem eating this meat.

    There are people who have an ethical problem with the killing of higher life forms as defined at some arbitrary point. (For example some will eat fish, but no mammals.) These people most likely would not have a problem with this type of meat, although depending upon its origins some might.

    There are some people who object to the killing of any living animal. Some or those people will likely not have a problem with this meat and some will (since it does originate from an animal) but most will probably be fine with it.

    Finally there are people who believe meat is evil. These people will likely refuse to eat this meat.

    On a slightly different note, I read a study last week that said 1 in 5 high schoolers thought beef came from pigs. I don't imagine this will do anything to alleviate this educational problem.