AC/DC were so smart, never to release their songs on the radio, as singles, or in movie soundtracks. By demanding "whole album or nothing" they really proved their point on this whole issue.
The copyright on a non-protected derivative work automatically reverts to the original copyright holder. In this case, if I transcribe the dialogue to a movie, the dialogue still clearly belongs to whoever owns the copyright on the movie. If they license Netflix to use the dialogue as subtitles, then Netflix are within their rights to take it from transcriptions done without license.
Oh come on. Both articles you link to are full of nothing but conjecture and opinion, and both are about the same accident.
Plus, anecdotal evidence tells us nothing. What I want to know is: how many accidents on average do Google autonomous cars have per mile, and how does that relate to the average for human-driven cars?
In my experience, people get personally hurt when they are told that they don't need equipment as good as another department. It's one thing not to hand it out in the first place, but I can never imagine an employer taking away part of someone's working environment and equipment. It's a slap in the face. It's also disruptive to productivity-- Once someone is used to their setup, changing it at all can waste their time, especially taking away equipment they are used to as part of their daily process.
I may be wrong, but I think this one is backwards compatible with the last one. It basically adds all of the other connections to mini-DVI, doesn't it?
Interesting memory you have there. Because mine clearly includes a first wave of USB devices that were ALL "bondi blue" to go with the first generation iMac. By the time the PC manuacturers came on board, a lot of accessories already existed thanks to a market Apple created. The commodity PC market-- sorry, WinTel world-- may have benefited from "free" USB on Intel motherboards, but it didn't hurt that Apple made sure devices already existed for those ports.
Is it actually "reverse engineering" if you scrape the data off the ROM? It sounds like the phrase "reverse engineering" is just being used to avoid a DMCA attack.
Sure, this vastly increased sales-- the artist's direct sales of the trade paperback on his own Etsy. We have no sense at all of the scale of impact on overall sales. In effect, this was just the best opportunity he had had to drive traffic to his own site. Would this have even shown up as a blip in total overall sales? Did Amazon see a similar peak?
To me, this is the perfect argument to make me question my often-Libertarian leanings. The reason we have governments is so that, as a society, we don't have to worry about situations like this. So we can extinguish the fire, without wondering if it was paid for. So we can protect the neighborhood (or surrounding land). Fire departments are in place to provide a necessary protection for society as a whole, and that system breaks down if one person can opt out-- or even be put in a position to have to choose whether to opt out. Fire departments should not have a fee associated, they should be covered by a tax.
Did you read the summary? While I am sure the results would be brilliant YouTube (or Darwin awards) material, how do you get hundreds of men with shotguns up into the tree canopy?
I'll answer your leading questions with another question-- Who cares?
This is a case of a private company deciding which kind of speech/opinion they want to transmit. They had a contract which allowed them to pull this content, and they pulled it. More power to them, it's not like this "church" can't relocate to another hosting provider.
I can think of one single, consistent reason why all of those questions are unanswered-- because they can be provided via software, and Apple is unsure about whether to provide them (or at least whether they will be included in the release version).
In most cases, the best clue comes from what has been done on the iPhone...
Can you save and transfer documents to the iPad? Document live within Applications. No shared filespace. So yes and no.
Does the iPad support Microsoft Exchange email? Yes.
Does the iPad support VPN? Yes, but some features aren't done.
Configuration management? Yes, for corporate customers, but some features aren't done.
So what? I get that some FOSS types really don't like patents, especially software patents, but where's the news in this story? It's not like she raped her dog. Nothing especially heinous, unusual, or hypocritical happened here.
If I just call myself a Journalist, and print up some business cards, and then murder someone-- Will I add to this statistic? If so, it's meaningless, and only demonstrates that in 2009 it's easier to call yourself a journalist without actually being one.
Slashdot Mirror
AC/DC were so smart, never to release their songs on the radio, as singles, or in movie soundtracks. By demanding "whole album or nothing" they really proved their point on this whole issue.
$24 more in parts? Perhaps. But so what?
However, what about differences in costs around engineering, part yields, manufacturing time, etc.?
Stories like this are meaningless. The headline should read: "Some guy guesses some numbers."
The copyright on a non-protected derivative work automatically reverts to the original copyright holder. In this case, if I transcribe the dialogue to a movie, the dialogue still clearly belongs to whoever owns the copyright on the movie. If they license Netflix to use the dialogue as subtitles, then Netflix are within their rights to take it from transcriptions done without license.
Oh come on. Both articles you link to are full of nothing but conjecture and opinion, and both are about the same accident. Plus, anecdotal evidence tells us nothing. What I want to know is: how many accidents on average do Google autonomous cars have per mile, and how does that relate to the average for human-driven cars?
Seriously, how is this news? The article title is clearly an opinion. Just because your Kool-Ade is opensource doesn't make groupthink healthy.
In my experience, people get personally hurt when they are told that they don't need equipment as good as another department. It's one thing not to hand it out in the first place, but I can never imagine an employer taking away part of someone's working environment and equipment. It's a slap in the face. It's also disruptive to productivity-- Once someone is used to their setup, changing it at all can waste their time, especially taking away equipment they are used to as part of their daily process.
I'm aiming to have 200 million customers in four years too. And I'm about a likely to get them as Ubuntu is to meet their goal.
I may be wrong, but I think this one is backwards compatible with the last one. It basically adds all of the other connections to mini-DVI, doesn't it?
Interesting memory you have there. Because mine clearly includes a first wave of USB devices that were ALL "bondi blue" to go with the first generation iMac. By the time the PC manuacturers came on board, a lot of accessories already existed thanks to a market Apple created. The commodity PC market-- sorry, WinTel world-- may have benefited from "free" USB on Intel motherboards, but it didn't hurt that Apple made sure devices already existed for those ports.
Is it actually "reverse engineering" if you scrape the data off the ROM? It sounds like the phrase "reverse engineering" is just being used to avoid a DMCA attack.
Verizon offers DSL in far more areas than FiOS. I suspect the results would be more meaningful if their two products were separated.
Sure, this vastly increased sales-- the artist's direct sales of the trade paperback on his own Etsy. We have no sense at all of the scale of impact on overall sales. In effect, this was just the best opportunity he had had to drive traffic to his own site. Would this have even shown up as a blip in total overall sales? Did Amazon see a similar peak?
To me, this is the perfect argument to make me question my often-Libertarian leanings. The reason we have governments is so that, as a society, we don't have to worry about situations like this. So we can extinguish the fire, without wondering if it was paid for. So we can protect the neighborhood (or surrounding land). Fire departments are in place to provide a necessary protection for society as a whole, and that system breaks down if one person can opt out-- or even be put in a position to have to choose whether to opt out. Fire departments should not have a fee associated, they should be covered by a tax.
Did you read the summary? While I am sure the results would be brilliant YouTube (or Darwin awards) material, how do you get hundreds of men with shotguns up into the tree canopy?
A recent well-publicized study re-pegged that dangerous number (for liver damage to be likely) at ~2g.
I'll answer your leading questions with another question-- Who cares? This is a case of a private company deciding which kind of speech/opinion they want to transmit. They had a contract which allowed them to pull this content, and they pulled it. More power to them, it's not like this "church" can't relocate to another hosting provider.
Legal with your own property. Vandalism if it belongs to Apple, which is the case with the display models.
I agree. This question got through without enough information to be answerable. My guess is this either refers to storage or bandwidth.
A man's "breast" is not sexual FFS. He was being dopey, pulling a third-grade prank, with no sexual undertones.
You must be new here.
That Kissinger quote just goes to show that Jews were the originators of the same sort of guilt now commonly associated with Catholics.
I can think of one single, consistent reason why all of those questions are unanswered-- because they can be provided via software, and Apple is unsure about whether to provide them (or at least whether they will be included in the release version).
In most cases, the best clue comes from what has been done on the iPhone...
Can you save and transfer documents to the iPad? Document live within Applications. No shared filespace. So yes and no.
Does the iPad support Microsoft Exchange email? Yes.
Does the iPad support VPN? Yes, but some features aren't done.
Configuration management? Yes, for corporate customers, but some features aren't done.
So what? I get that some FOSS types really don't like patents, especially software patents, but where's the news in this story? It's not like she raped her dog. Nothing especially heinous, unusual, or hypocritical happened here.
If I just call myself a Journalist, and print up some business cards, and then murder someone-- Will I add to this statistic? If so, it's meaningless, and only demonstrates that in 2009 it's easier to call yourself a journalist without actually being one.
A zombie is a dead thing that moves. This article describes a living thing that doesn't move. How far off can it get?