Slashdot Mirror


Kutztown Students get Felony Charges

gone6713 writes "The 13 students from Pennsylvania who were accused of hacking the iBooks provided to them by the school (Slashdot had a previous story on them back in June) have offically been charged. It seems that the admin passwords were taped to the back of the iBooks!"

30 of 825 comments (clear)

  1. Human error by bigwavejas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "It seems that the admin passwords were taped to the back of the iBooks!"

    You know, I'm really not surprised to hear this. Despite all the precautions companies/ institutions take, it's typically human negligence or social engineering that leads to many compromises. While doing a spot check of security at work, I was surprised to find many employees had taped their passwords to the bottom of their keyboard or mouse.

    Rule#1 make sure your users (employees, admins, etc) understand the importance of confidentiality.

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Human error by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Rule #2 - have a sane password policy

      Forcing people to have different passwords for different systems that change on different timetables is just asking for them to break Rule #1.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:Human error by Freexe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why do people write down the real password?

      I have to change my passwprd once a month and I always write down a password hint

      So if my password was 'omg_this_is_hard_password!' i would write down 'you will never guess this months password, it's hard!' and that would be enough for me to remember

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    3. Re:Human error by Urchlay · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Instead, they wanted me to use the AUTOEXEC.BAT batch file to launch the menu system rather than a menuing application started directly on bootup. Why? So that they could watch and see who hit CTRL-C at boot to exit the batch file.

      When I was 11 or 12, in public school, we got computers (TRS-80 CoCo's, which dates me I guess). The first day we had them, the teacher told us to turn them on, then don't touch anything until she told us to...

      Well, I turned mine on, and the monitor just showed a black picture. So I turned up the brightness (it was down all the way), and fixed it. It never occurred to me that "don't touch anything" included the brightness control; I'd had one of those on my TV for as long as I could remember. I thought she meant "don't type anything"...

      So I got suspended from school for a week. For turning up the brightness. Looking back on it now, I can see that I deserved *something* for disobeying a direct order... detention perhaps, or losing computer privileges for a week...

      Of course, back then I thought of being suspended as a great vacation. I got to stay home and play with my computer (Atari 400, which I liked better than the CoCo anyway).

      The thing was, when the teacher saw me tweak that knob, the expression on her face was one of *terror*. Not surprise, or anger... Utter, abject fear. I can only assume it was the machines she was afraid of, not me (I was big for my age, but not known for beating people up, especially not teachers).

      Then and now, the teachers and administrators probably resent having to have the computers at all. They don't understand computers (well, OK, most people don't), but they *do* understand that the kids know more about computers than they ever will, which makes the adults feel like they're not in control. The type of person who becomes a school administrator is the type who hates being out of control, so they use (or abuse) their authority to make sure the kids are too terrified to step out of line.

      Not too long ago, I did a contract job for a school system, setting up routers and proxy (censoring) software. One day the boss (former English teacher who was put in charge of the school's IT dept) asked me what I was doing, so I told her. I don't remember exactly what I said, but it was probably something like "I'm installing Apache so you can use this CGI script to configure your whitelist and blacklist for the squid proxy". Her response was, "Don't use all those technical terms with me! How would you like it if I used educational jargon when talking to you?"

      It almost made me crack up laughing... but she was dead serious. So I calmed myself, and I told her (and not in a smart-assed way either): "Well, if you used words I didn't understand, I'd ask you to explain them. You're a teacher, so you're probably pretty good at that. I was trying to communicate with you, not confuse you, so tell me what I said that you didn't understand, and I'll try to explain it."

      She got *pissed*. I mean red-faced, white-knuckled, and shaking. She stormed off...

      A week later my company was officially fired from that contract (possibly *only* because of that incident, but probably not: we were behind schedule, partly because we kept having explain basic networking concepts to the school's IT employees, who were supposed to be supervising us). Since then, I've avoided public schools like the plague, and been happier for it. If I ever have kids, there's no way I'd send them to a school where people like that English teacher have authority over them.

      If these "hackers" were my kids, I wouldn't punish them, but I would take them aside and explain that the mundanes are terrified of them, and ask them to hide their brains when in such company. I'd tell 'em not to worry, the cream always rises to the top... I'd also send 'em to a good private school, even if it meant a second or third mortgage on the house.

    4. Re:Human error by DarkVader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing I can't comprehend is why you think you needed some sort of punishment for taking some sort of initiative and fixing a VERY simple and obvious problem. If nothing else, the teacher needed some more education, not you - something on sensitivity and abuse of authority.

      She obviously had some sort of control issue.

    5. Re:Human error by HBI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  2. Taped? by AdamReyher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the students should face some kind of consequences, in my opinion, the sheer stupidity puts this at the fault of those "victims" rather than the students.

    --
    The Computations of AdamR
    http://www.adamreyher.com
    1. Re:Taped? by canadian_right · · Score: 3, Insightful
      These are kids.

      In civilised countries kids who use a password TAPED to the computer have their computer privleges revoked, a lecture, and a meeting with their parents and the administration. They are NOT turned over to the police. In civilised countries the authorities know that children, even older teenagers, sometimes do stupid things and need more help and guidance than adults. When children screw up treating them as criminials just makes it more likely that they will become criminials.

      Many countries have (even some states in the USA) have programs for first time offenders that diverts them from the normal criminal law courts. The diversion usually involves an apology, restitution, and community work. 90% of first time offenders that are diverted this way never commit another crime.

      USA highschools, as reported in the media, are the most screwed up institutions on the planet. Scholastic achievment is punished, sports achievement is lauded, minor incidents are harshly punished. It is like some twisted Kaffkaesque prision.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  3. Surely the best route of action... by Satorian · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yup, just go ahead and charge them for curiousity and doing something perfectly natural.

    Make sure to slap the hungry monkey's wrist that sees a stick next to an ant hill. Does wonders for intellectual development on a macro- and microscale.

  4. Hack? by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really, can't we get the media to stop using the work Hack in this way? Finding a password taped onto a notebook isn't hacking.

    Sure, they may have used the computers in way which they shouldn't but, they didn't have to hack them.

    I know, I know... the average Joe couldn't tell the difference between anything remotely technical but the media shouldn't be encourage it.

    I think I'll go let Windows Hack into my neighbor's unsecured wireless access point.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  5. Yes and no by davmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, I will agree that felony charges here is rather extreme, and someone isn't thinking. A few days of detention (for both the students and the security administrator) would be more appropriate.

    But the fact that the passwords were on the back of the iBooks does not mean everyone was free to use them at will.

    I can tape the key to my house on to the front door of my house, and while that is extreme stupidity on my part, that does not give you permission to unlock the door and come inside.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  6. More than just using the taped password by Cerdic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article:

    Now that's not the only thing that the kids are accused of doing, they also turned off the monitoring software (Apple Remote Desktop?) and even used it to monitor the admins. In addition, they're accused of using hacking tools to find the new admin password when it was changed from the password that was taped on the back of the machines.

    Also, if you click on the little update link at the bottom of the story, you'll see that the kids were also found to be downloading pornography. Might sound innocent to some of you, but adults / the school can get in trouble for "allowing" them access to X-rated material.

    Now, a third degree felony sounds harsh, but they still need some punishment. If they had stopped at using the password taped onto the back of the computers I'd feel sorry for them, but they were spying on admins and using other means to get the password once it was changed.

    --
    Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    1. Re:More than just using the taped password by stevew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yep - the other little detail folks are not mentioning here is that the kids used some sort of rootkit equivalent to find the password AFTER it had been changed.

      Doesn't that qualify for breaking and entering?????

      These kids aren't angels...and whoops - there was consequences for their illegal actions..oh and to make sure everyone here gets that. These kids committed a crime. They KNOWNINGLY violated the machines by using the admin password they weren't suppose to have. Look - if I leave my house unlocked, does that make it any more wrong for someone to enter and start taking my things?

      The other issue is that these are still kids, and if they're under 18.... it isn't on their permanent record. If you guys are constantly going to make excuses though about oh- it wasn't that bad, then the rest of the rules of society might as well fly out the window as well.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    2. Re:More than just using the taped password by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful
      These kids aren't angels...and whoops - there was consequences for their illegal actions..oh and to make sure everyone here gets that. These kids committed a crime.

      You're right. Hardened felons, all of them. Criminals. Malcontents. Society can't possbily function with these kinds of challenges to authority... much less the status quo. Fly out the window, indeed! Thankfully, this kind of spirit has been identified early and, we can only hope, properly quashed. The last thing we need is any of the kind of insanity that lead to the shennanigans in Silicon Valley.
    3. Re:More than just using the taped password by nxtw · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The issue here is that the kids were _given_ these laptops to use for the school year. They were permitted to take them home and use them on networks other than the schools'.

      A computer is NOT a house. A computer can essentially be restored to its original (software) state with minimal effort. I highly doubt all six hundred laptops were individually configured, and instead had some sort of imaging or automated network install, so any broken installations could be restored easily. From what I have been told about Mac OS X, there is an option to reinstall the system without deleting user profiles, so students wouldn't even have to lose files (if they weren't stored or backed up on a network.)

      But if I walk into someone's (unlocked) house, and steal their TV, jewelry, and other items of value, they've lost them. They can't go restore the backup. They can't put in a few CDs and reinstall their stolen TV and jewelry. Their only hope is to have the items recovered somehow.

  7. This is only the beginning... by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    in our increasingly vengence based culture. Some principal or admin got his feathers ruffled that student's would actually use the passwords taped to their computers and is now on a rampage to bring them into submission or destroy their lives. I'm surprised they haven't been labeled terrorists by now. This goes way beyond this school district... witness the proliferation of "no tolerance" policies. Everyone makes mistakes, especially teens... we as a society should be focused on correcting mistakes and giving people the chance to learn from them. It's only those who refuse to recognze they made a mistake or continually fail to learn from them that need to be dragged in front of the courts.

  8. At what point does "Hacking" begin by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And "looking at what people give you" stop ?

    I'd assume they'd WANT me to know the admin password if it was taped to the back of the laptop.

  9. This is obviously what the parents want by keraneuology · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If not a single member of the board of education loses the next election over this then I will chalk this up to this being the will of the people and forget about it.

    Whoever taped those passwords to the back of the computers needs to be fired. Whoever gave that person a job needs to be fired. Whoever has the authority to demand that the people above must be fired immediately but hasn't needs to be fired.

    But this isn't happening. Rather than start demanding even a fleeting glimpse of intelligence within the public schools the parents simply get together and whine that the people they voted for have their heads so far up their rectum that you can't distinguish a fart from a whistle don't engage in sphincter-yoga.

    Yes, there is the possibility that these parents didn't vote this particular schoolboard (and mayor , who allowed this particular police chief and DA to make such stupid decisions), but I'll hedge my bets and say that either they voted for them or didn't vote at all.

    Are they demanding the resignation of the board? No.

    Are they demanding the resignation of the DA? No.

    Are they even promising to vote for somebody else in the next election? No.

    So if they don't care enough to actually DO something about the situation, why should anybody else?

    --
    If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  10. abusing admin account was only the beginning by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was one thing to essentially commandeer borrowed government property. (It doesn't matter if they negligently made the key available for use or not.) They also went about expanding their control first by blocking the admin's ability to monitor then by breaking into the admin account again... it was not taped to the computer the second time.

    Afterward, they went on to monitoring the admin.

    This is their defiance of authority and that's the message here.

    On one hand, I think it's "harsh" what is being done to the kids -- I really do. But there's a larger picture here that should be acknowledged.

    How many times have you been completely and utterly insulted by children who know there's nothing you can do about it. That is, in essence, what has happened here. When it was realized that the kids were breakign rules, they were essentially given the chance to straighten up when they were discovered and their admin passwords changed. The kids responded by being even mroe defiant and even aggressive about it.

    We have a cultural mess on our hands. I'm just sick enough of defiant children to endorse the reaction we are seeing here. You can't spank children any more. Somehow it became a crime. You can't even talk "mean" to them -- it's somehow psychological abuse as well. As a culture, we cannot control the children. And it's clear that most parents will not regulate their offspring as well... (at least without fear of criminal problems much of the time)

    I have two sons of my own and at the moment, my biggest problem is getting them to tell the truth. I haven't seen evidence of anything worse... not yet anyway. Respect for authority is a critical lesson in life that needs to be learned. If we have to make 13 examples of these kids, then so be it. It could help in changing the path for millions of other kids out there... kids that will one day grow up and lead this world. And if you think I'm over-reacting myself, look around you at the many "adults" out there who are early evidence of the things to come... people who never actually grew up and took responsibility for themselves. Examples are not hard to find.

    Respect, in general, should be restored as a key value in our culture and at the core of respect is fear of what might happen if you don't.

    1. Re:abusing admin account was only the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I completely agree with you that our culture has an issue with young people growing up irresponsible and disrespectful. I am 18 myself, and I am regularly disgusted and appalled by the behavior of my so-called "peers" and other young people.

      However, I disagree with your assessment of how to respond to the issue. Over and over again you are talking about "controlling" children - about "respecting authority". You bemoan the demise of spanking and complain that you can't "talk mean" to kids.

      Now, I am not a psychologist nor have I studied child rearing - as I said, I'm only 18 myself. But what I would like to suggest, for whatever it is worth, is that respect isn't something that is instilled by control. It's something earned and taught. My parents never tried to control me and my siblings. We were never spanked, punished, or yelled at for things we did "wrong". Rather, they gently explained our error and, if necessary, had us make amends. Our parents raised us with respect for *us* - and helped us learn to respect others as well, by being living examples. I am not saying this approach necessarily works with all children (or all adults - some of y'all need to to think about the example of respect you're setting!). But I was dismayed by your advocacy of what is essentially parental authoritarianism, and I felt that a counter-example might be worth writing.

      I would also dispute your statement that Respect for authority is a critical lesson in life that needs to be learned. Why? I agree with you that respect is an important lesson, but I would argue that respect should simply be for people and for property in general. Why should we respect authority? Teach kids to think for themselves, and educate them in moral principles so that they can make responsible decisions in their own right.

      In closing, your post states:

      Respect, in general, should be restored as a key value in our culture and at the core of respect is fear of what might happen if you don't.

      I cannot say loudly enough how much I disagree with that. Respect isn't about fear at all. It's about doing what is right. It's about holding others in high enough esteem to want to treat them well. Heck, the good old "golden rule" is a simplistic but reasonable enough definition of respect - treat others the way you'd want to be treated, set their rights equal to your own. But fear of retribution? Where is the moral strength in that?

      My 47.5 cents.

    2. Re:abusing admin account was only the beginning by canadian_right · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A reasonable punishment would be to take away the laptops.

      If the kids won't follow the rules then take away the toys. If they are flounting the school rules then use one of the normal school punishments to deal with it. Even after repeat offensives of this type the school and parents should be able to deal with it without resorting to trumped up charges of "hacking". This is the school being vindictive.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    3. Re:abusing admin account was only the beginning by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really do think you have it all wrong here. First of all you can still spank kids depending on the severity of the marks left (in almost all states) Second of all unless you really go off the deep end no one is going to charge you with psychological abuse. The Klutztown 13 aren't "defiant children", that conjures up 8 year olds who are running into the street when they are being told not to. They are teenagers with minds of their own who are probably never given an explanation for anything by the administrators. Think about this, they are rational human beings, so they expect rational reasoning for decisions. Now, if you remember high school, you probably remember that it was almost all bullshit. Or at least if you had gone recently you'd know that it has become entirely bs. You can simply use logic with teenagers, most of them WILL actually follow it give them a damn chance instead of just chalking it up to "defiance". Yes one needs to learn to respect authority, but one also needs to learn how to react when authority is acting like a bunch of special olympics finalists. Granted their actions were wrong, but what does it say about the admins that the children were able to spy on them without their noticing? I'll say this, the school system stores important documents, student information, teacher information, pay information; and unless the kids had proved these admins incompetent NO ONE WOULD HAVE. That's the way these school systems work, all the administrators and higher-ups protect each other in a strange polygarchy. These admins would NEVER have been exposed. Better now that Kutztown High has to learn how to secure the network that assuredly has valuable information on it. If we make examples out of these kids it will most assuredly NOT change the path for millions of other kids out there. Well, at least not the way you're thinking. It will instill in the kid's minds that adults are a group of heavy-handed assenine individuals that respond to questioning of their authroity with legal charges. Also, if you've noticed, most kids don't read or follow the news (a problem in itself), so in reality all one is doing is ruining the lives of 13 children. So in the end let's be logical with our teenagers (I'll admit that children can not often follow logic as well...heh) And not just expect them to blindly follow authority. As for your children, and I'm not making accusations here, how often do you lie? To them? To your spouse? To Authority figures? I'm not accusing you of it, just trying to show the point that children practice what they see. And it's not fair to say "well I don't lie now" but what about when they were growing up? When they were so young, you thought they didn't notice but they did. And of course I'm not saying that leading an exemplary life will lead to exemplary kids, just that it helps. Sir, the final line of your post sums up the reason why I find your line of reasoning unsuitable for anyone. "Respect, in general, should be restored as a key value in our culture and at the core of respect is fear of what might happen if you don't." If I recall correctly the quote went like this "Do not rule with force but with the fear of force" If you rule with fear, enjoy your sheep.

      --
      Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
    4. Re:abusing admin account was only the beginning by itsNothing · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I give the keys of a car to a kid. He (er, she) gets a ticket for speeding. Or driving under the influence. Or some other offense. They get a ticket. They do it again. They get another ticket. Fairly quickly they will lose their license. Because, driving is a priviledge.

      These kids repeatedly violated the rules of use of the machines. So take the machines away from them! The only unbreakable security strategy is to prevent access to the system.

      Each time the machines were returned to these kids constituted a challenge to them to crack the new level of "security". From what is written, it seems obvious that they demonstrated that they know more about computers than the admin at the school district. If the IT admin staff were only part-time (because they have more relevant obligations, like teaching), why shouldn't we expect that they are less informed than a collection of people who can provide "full-time" energy to the activity? Their mistake and criticizable failure was in not taking the student's machines away from them.

      Moreover, if i give the keys of a car to a drunk, i suspect (warning: IANAL) then i have liability if that person commits a crime (kills someone with the car, etc.). I believe this falls under aiding and abetting a crime. If the school's admins knew that these people were continually hacking the systems yet continued to provide them with the tools to do so, aren't they also liable?

  11. Really illustrates the problems with this law by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have the implicit right not to have your travel patterns monitored when you rent a car, but a school has the right to watch what students do with PC's ???.

    Then again it really shouldnt surprise me that incompetent people in the I.T. field wind up blaming everyone around them for their faults. In this case it seems they managed to get a sympathetic ear out of their local PD. Its sad that, you can have people harbor a child molestor and not be charged with so much as obstruction of justice, but here you have children being charged with unauthorized use of devices placed in their possesion.

    IANAL but the fact that the schools handed the PC's to the students, said use them to do their work will probably knock down any charges concerning them. It will be really hard to prove unauthorized access when they were handed the quipment and given access to the network. Taping the password the back of the machine should also throw out any claims that the systems were meant to be secure.

    This case shows what happens when legislators make law without understanding what they are trying to legislate or considering the consequences. If this application of the law is held valid it will allow any corporation, organization or group to take revenge on any employee or member that uses its computers and is disliked. To do so, all that would have to be done is change an employee manual or circulate a policy memo in a way that it would either not be read or misunderstood, and then call the police when someone keeps on doing what they had been doing.

  12. And still extreme overreaction by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They were punished multiple times and they still continued to do it."

    So a rational adult would simply take the laptop away from them. Either play by the rules or take it away.

    To me, this is the equivalent of sending your kid to reform school because he talked back one too many times. Its overreaction and really, its an admission of failure by the school authorities.

    Everybody in Kutztown should be ashamed of themselves.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  13. Re:Please Understand the Context by Heian-794 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But of course that logical, sensible solution doesn't jive with today's vengeful, zero-tolerance, conform-or-face-punishment society.

    This is the equivalent of writing in a library book, except that re-imaging the hard disk on a laptop is actually easier than removing writing from a library book.

    Anyone recall the scene in "Ender's Game" where the kids are virtually encouraged to mess around with their computers, in part so that the school can keep an eye on who's got creativity and daring and who's just a boring by-the-rules follower?

    We won't be raising the kind of smart kids we need to be defeating aliens and saving humanity with the Kutztown school district's attitude.

  14. You want to wake up by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You want to wake up, son. Lets put this in context, shall we? We are talking about a felony, that is entering children into the criminal justice system because the school admins didn't have clue one about how to secure their own systems from... children. The mini emporers in academia need a taste of their own medicine. Honestly speaking, a previous poster pointed out that taping the password to the backs of the computers was tantamount to incitement and solicitation of a minor. I wouldn't just use it as a threat though, I'd go afer the little hitlers until every man jack of them had spent a few months trying out the local prison facilites. Such irresponsible and knee jerk reactionists should under no circumstances be educating children.

    Don't get me wrong, I know some kids are wretched creatures that shouldn't be in general education, but in this case I think an example does need to be made. Of the so called teachers.

  15. Re:Additionally by Takumi2501 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Often the software used to change a password can spot a weak one (sequential numbers/letters, dictionary words, etc.) and prevent a user from setting it. With decent software and configuration, it isn't necessary to have a password "approved" by an actual person.

    Not the mention, the more inconvenient it is for a user to change his/her password, the less likely it is that s/he will do it.

    --
    Sent from my computer.
    Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
  16. Re:Somebody remind me.... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that PC's don't need to be in every classroom. There are some classes where they are needed though, for example in a business department to teach typing and the basics of word processing and spreadsheets. They can also be useful in other classes from Civics to Auto Shop to illustrate concepts and demonstrate how to find resources on the internet. But in those cases I believe it is more useful to have one computer with an LCD projector which would simply supplement the blackboard.

    I don't see any sense in limiting children to Microsoft products though which is what most school boards are doing. KDE/Gnome and Open Office contain 95% of the same functionality as MS Office but with easier administration and better security. Eliminating the license fees for MS Windows, MS Office, Windows Server, Visual Studio, MS Backoffice, and all the client access licenses to connect to MS server products would allow the district to purchase many more bare-metal commodity PC's within the same capital budget.

    And for teaching programming before college, Linux is a dream. There are a plethora of programming tools and compilers for every language under the sun, and most of them are free. Linux has taken the server market by storm and is also becoming the standard for small devices. School administrators should look 5-10 years down the road at when these kids will be college graduates and prepare them now for the Open Source future they will be living and working in.

  17. Looking back on it....I can see that I deserved... by Generalisimo+Zang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking back on it now, I can see that I deserved *something* for disobeying a direct order... detention perhaps, or losing computer privileges for a week...

    No. You deserved no punishment whatsoever for turning up the brightness on a monitor that had the brightness all the way down. Making that sort of adjustment is common sense.

    In fact, anyone who would suggest that displaying common sense is a crime, or that military-type jargon such as "disobeying a direct order" is something that we should be using to educate school children, is not thinking correctly.

    In fact, the whole idea that public schools should be run like a semi boot-camp type environment, with "direct orders" and "zero tolerance policies" and a complete and utter disdain for individual creative thinking, is just plain wrong.

    I was in the military for many years, and I know exactly what military-style training can and can't achieve. It's excellent for turning out people who will do things EXACTLY as ordered, and PRECISELY according to a pre-determined plan. It's really not that great at teaching creative thinking, or instilling a system of personal ethics that aren't imposed by an outside authority. It's great for cranking out infantrymen, and pretty darn awfull for instilling any sort of American democratic and egalitarian ideals.

    Heck, if the teacher in charge of that class had bothered to do her jo, and pre-check each machine and each monitor before class to ensure that the basic settings were correct, then the problem wouldn't have arisen in the first place. Oh, but wait, that would require people in positions of petty authority to take RESPONSIBILITY for their own actions.... definatelly a part of the military tradition that school authorities would want to run from like the plague ;) I mean, making KIDS be responsible for their actions is cool, but actually holding teachers and administrators to the same standard? Heh.. it'll never happen.