Slashdot Mirror


Graphics Card Comparison Guide

JaniceZ writes "These days, there are so many graphics card models that it has become quite impossible to keep up with the different configurations. Therefore, we decided to compile this guide to provide an easy reference for those who are interested in comparing the specifications of the various desktop GPUs in the market as well as those already obsolescent or obsolete."

7 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. But what about Linux drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I started (or attempted to start) using Linux with a modern graphics card a few years back when I started university, just out of plain curiosity. My buddy and I downloaded the ISO images of Red Hat Linux 8.0, and from that point forward, it all went to shit.

    I figured it would be no problem, I used Sun's Solaris quite a bit so I understood the shell at least. Install went well, even though I was confused why I needed seven million partitions which I had to allocate manually and to have a root password since it was a single user machine. After my install, I restarted my machine, saw a bunch of ugly crap being spewed to the screen, and before you knew it, X Windows loaded up and I was in Linux. "Ooh, this looks neat, just like Windows. Let's see if I can surf the web!"

    This is the point where I discovered the 'magic' of Linux. It couldn't find a driver for a simple ethernet card. So I got onto another computer running Windows, and found some type of driver for it. All right, I'll just burn it to a cd, pop it onto the Linux machine, and we're good to go. I started looking around for the CD ROM icon...where was it? Apparently I had to mount it manually, luckily I know UNIX. Then it asks me for root password. Okay, so I enter it. Then I can see the CD ROM, great. Oh look, the driver is in the form of source code, I have to compile it. So I tried to compile it with the configure script that came along. Oh wait, I need some !@#$ing stupid C library. All right, so I download that as well in the form of a RPM, which luckily worked, and then I was able to compile the driver.

    Okay now what? According to the instructions, I had to recompile the kernel making the driver a part of it. 'Recompile the kernel?' I thought, 'What kind of sick operating system makes you recompile its kernel...' Apparently I didn't know what kind of twisted people designed Linux. Oh wait, it wants the stupid root password again...good God. So after about 5 hours, I had Internet...given that I knew how to use a UNIX machine. Four days later I tried installing something else, it asked me for the same stupid C library but version 1.2.3.4.5 instead of the version I had...God forbid...1.2.3.4.4 (oh what a fool I was for not updating every 10 minutes!) Within an hour, my drive was formatted (twice out of spite) and running Windows XP.

    A few months back I was inspired again to run Linux. If you read the tech news, there's no doubt about it, it's taking over the server market. A Linux sys admin will make 20 grand more than a Windows sys admin (Makes you wonder if 20 grand is worth eventual suicide), so I felt I should pick it up. Of course now I was more prepared, I've read books, admin guides, worked as a student UNIX operator, 3 years under my belt as a computer science student, two internships, and had studied the Linux kernel in depth.

    I decided I would try a whole bunch of distributions, I tried Red Hat 9, Fedora Core 2, SuSe 9.1, Debian, and Mandrake 10. All special in there own little way...like retarded children. As soon as SuSe loaded up, I was like..."nice nice, very sleek...", then a hissing came out my left speaker that wouldn't go away. Nice autodetection for the sound driver. Bye bye SuSe. All right, let's try Red Hat 9...oh look Red Hat won't give any more automatic updates because now that it has a little bit of money...!@#$ open source, let's become the next Microsoft! Oh Debian and Mandrake, just plain ugly and slow.

    What about Fedora Core, Red Hat's latest method of getting code for free rather than having to pay programmers in India $0.85 an hour to do it. Why pay someone when you can have some idiot from GNU or some grad student do it for free, then sell it for 400 bucks a pop. It was surprising though that that experimental piece of crap worked better than all the other distributions, even though its autoupdate some how corrupted my kernel and I had to overwrite it.

    But what I find most stupid is the philosophy behind it. Why make something so complex for free? I'm an excellent software engineer

    1. Re:But what about Linux drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      shut your mouth you stupid mac faggot

    2. Re:But what about Linux drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Here here! There's a reason the majority of computer users don't use Linux... and it isn't because of Microsoft. It is because Linux just doesn't work out of the box like Windows does.

      And to those Slashdot readers who haven't used Windows since 3.1, no, Windows XP does not have blue screens or general protection faults, so don't even bother.

  2. "takes incredible amounts of education"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Gee, I must be a farking genius!!!!!! I've got a 7th grade education, and I'm having no problems.When I first started to use LINUX, I had a few problems.The worst problem I had was trying to get help from azzholes off of such irc channels as #newbie, #linux, etc. I found a friend in an entity named wesguin on a cheesy message board at chat.arachne.cz.He replied with these for simple letters, RTFM (Read The Farking Manual). I can tell you were born in the late '70's, early '80's as your education is on par with the instant gratification crowd,(my 23 y.o. lady calls them the 30 seconds and under crowd).Maybe you should RTFM and maybe even read the comments in the source code. Better yet, just stick with wind0ze, after all, it's easier to point and click.And it keeps me in business. :-)

  3. Re:Article content is medicore at best by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fortunately, I've converted to the Mac, so I don't have to worry about stupid things like having a choice in graphics cards.

    So you don't like choice?

    Tell me again when your kids are forced to be Christians and have to learn all about Creationism in school.

    You might be intellectually lazy, but having the right to exercise choice is important for any free thinking human being. I for one do NOT welcome that choice hating/locked down system architecture overlord in Steve Jobs.

  4. Re:Short list by geekoid · · Score: -1, Troll

    "especially if you did something silly like buy an Intel P4. If you can afford one of these you can afford a proper AMD 64-bit processor to go with it."

    Except AMD is full of lying thiving bastards. Other then that, yeah there cool. well, hot really.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Re:Article content is medicore at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Really? When I bought my G5 tower I had the choice between a GeForce 6800 Ultra, an ATI X800XT, an ATI 9600XT, or an aftermarket ATI Radeon 9800 Pro.

    And your outdated AGP graphics slot severely limits your choice of graphics cards now that the transition to PCI Express x16 is almost complete. When the frick is Apple gonna add PCI Express to their chipsets?