Slashdot Mirror


Sony and Toshiba Give Up On Unified DVD Format

HoTiCE_ is one of several to let us know, Reuters is reporting Sony and Toshiba have apparently given up efforts to develop a unified format for next-generation DVDs. The two companies had opened up negotiations but they fell through due to time constraints on new products from both groups.

8 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Dual format? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I'm hoping someone will have the bright idea of making a "dual format" player, much like the DVD-R/DVD+R burners. Of course, we never had a dual format VCR (beta/vhs)...but then, at least the Blu-ray and HD DVD's will be the same physical size.

    1. Re:Dual format? by NekoXP · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same laser wavelength too.

      I wonder actually what is so different between the two formats.. the way it's
      encoded on the disk, right? Isn't this a SOFTWARE issue (drive firmware) more
      than anything, or is there really some strangeness involved that I am missing.

      Maybe the dual-layer (and triple-layer) technologies use incompatible ways of
      focussing the laser; but isn't that also down to software and the use of another
      lens (like CDRW/DVD drives have already..)

      I dunno, really.. I don't have access to the specs. Who does? Who can make a
      really informed statement that dual-format drives will be possible?

      The trouble then is which format will the industry pick?

      I would say HD-DVD - because it's inherent cheapness (same disc layout as DVD,
      same manufacturing facilities and little changes to machinery will make it as cheap
      if not cheaper than DVD). Blu-Ray requires people to retool.

      Blu-Ray may end up being the custom format that runs the Playstation 3, like UMD
      is the custom format that runs the PSP, Matsushita's discs were the custom format that ran the Gamecube, and GD-ROM was the custom format that ran the Dreamcast.

      Besides Sony releasing their own movies in Blu-Ray format for the PS3 and a clutch of Sony & Samsung players, why would any cheap-ass (and we're all cheapasses at heart) bother with it? Remember in the VHS/Betamax war, Sony lost at the end of the day. They are not infallible and we shouldn't just think that because they have the Playstation that they will not lose again.

      Neko

  2. DRM will kill them by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm an so called early adopter, had dvd player before they became common, had hdtv before the stations even started broadcasting. There's no way, i'm throwing out a $3000 tv to be able to watch hi def video disks. Thats absurb. Right now I can watch all my hdtv movies either on HD HBO or HD OnDemand all going threw component outs on my cable reciever. Thats good enough for me. I higly doubt my cable company is going to require HDMI or HDCP DVI anytime soon.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  3. Re:Whatever by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
    > I bet that within two years we'll have drives that can read/write both HD-DVD and Blu-ray.

    And what are you going to display them on?

    You'll have one dual-format HD-DVD/Blu-Ray player. It'll have two outputs. One will pipe HDMI video to your Toshiba HDTV. The other will pipe HDMI video to your Sony HDTV.

    Why the second HDTV? Well, how else did you think you were going to watch any movies made by Sony Pictures? :)

    And why does Sony Pictures have the right to make sure that Sony's movies are only released on Sony-formatted DVDs that will decode correctly only on Sony HDMI screens? Well, they asked for the Betamax precedent to be overtu~`~~~
    Petard-hoisting error -- industry dumped

  4. if your working tv... by E8086 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "if your working television sits on top of your non-working television you might be a redneck" -Jeff Foxworthy

    Now picture this: "if your working HD-DVD player sits on top of your other working, but less used, Blue-Ray DVD player which sits on top of your other working standard DVD player you might be a pissed off consumer."

    Having too many formats is just going to result in unhappy consumers and I'm going to get calls from the people who know I make things work because they bought a HD-DVD player but a movie on a BlueRay disk and BestBuy won't take it back because it's opened and since it's a DVD it can only be exchanged to exactly the same thing, not a different disk format.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  5. True nature of this fight. . . by doctor_no · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Out of all the coverage that has gone on about the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray battle something that has been seriously overlooked is the what this fight is really about. Toshiba and Time Warner makes an incredible amount of money from DVD 6C and other Toshiba/Sanyo/Warner ownened patents, they get a kick back from every DVD and DVD player that hits the market becaue they are the main beneficiaries of the 6C patents. And they are trying to keep these patents in place for the next-generation of high-definition media.

    Blu-ray is an effort to get around the 6C patents and Toshiba owned patents. When Sony and co. approached Toshiba/NEC/Warner in forming a unified format, one of the conditions that was put in place was to keep the 6C patents in place, and merely keep the software aspect of Blu-ray. This of course is why an agreement cannot be reached. Neither side has any reverance for the consumer.

    1. Re:True nature of this fight. . . by adam31 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's always struck me as very odd how the teams line up in this format war. Matsushita, Toshiba and IBM are all in 6C, yet Matsushita swapped teams and lined up with Sony on Blu-Ray. IBM jumped on with Sony for the PS3. Toshiba, of course, backs HD-DVD but they are also partnered with Sony to do production for the Cell processors going into the PS3-- whose support of BluRay is arguably HD-DVD's greatest threat!

      Really, I just don't get it. Is everyone (except Sony) playing both sides of the fence?

  6. Re:Same as SACD/DVD-Audio by hattig · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know what irks me?

    The fact that even $50 DVD players have digital 5.1 audio out, yet can't play a bloody DVD Audio disc. It's only a matter of piping the bloody digital data from the disc to the outputs.

    Why? I bet it is licensing. DVD Audio would have been the outright winner by now if it had been included in standard DVD players. But no, I'm sure the audio market got all scared and said 'No' to that, so they could continue to sell their expensive dedicated players. Sadly, because of the format war, like someone else pointed out above, 90% of the market disappeared, so they made less money in the end. I also expect there is some DRM reason, if the audio was available in DRM-removed format on a 5.1 digital output, then it can easily be stolen!

    Maybe Sony or Toshiba should look at that and think how bad this is for their business. But no, they won't, it doesn't apply to them, they're too big for that, they're too proud to admit it. I'm hoping that because it happened once already, it will happen again. DVDs are good enough, except for the minor percentage of people that have 60"+ HDTVs that will notice the encoding blockiness.

    In the meantime, my local superstore is selling new DVDs from 97p each. Sure, the 97p DVDs aren't blockbuster films, but you can't go wrong with over an hour of classic cartoons and so on for that price.