Slashdot Mirror


FCC Extends VoIP 911 Deadline

a.different.perspect writes "The Federal Communications Commission has extended the deadline for formal acknowledgement of the limitations of the Enhanced 911 service used by VoIP providers by 30 days, to September 28. The FCC requires that VoIP companies in the United States inform and receive acknowledgement from all their customers of the pitfalls of E911, which corresponds 911 calls made on a VoIP service with the physical address of the caller according to company records but which won't report correct information if, for example, a customer uses their VoIP phone away from their registered address. Currently 1.5 million VoIP subscribers have confirmed their acceptance of E911, but 100,000 are yet to respond and had faced the termination of their service."

14 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Um by seramar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't you have thought that this would have been a requirement upon the initial activation of the service for liability reasons? I mean seriously, if you can get sued over hot coffee (mcdonald's, not GTA ;) ) then I think this could really get you pwnd. No, I haven't RTFA. It just sounds like a bunch of idiocy anyway.

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
    1. Re:Um by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually this was started because a mommy tried to dial 911 on her VOIP phone, therefore not getting help in time to save her child.

      Don't you just love how people put the blame on something else? Oh no you were too stupid to even understand your PHONE so you better blame them.

    2. Re:Um by The+Dobber · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The fact that someone lost a child due to the inability of contacting emergency services is tragic. One should expect this basic ability for any phone service.

    3. Re:Um by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter what the temperature of the liquid was ... you're still an idiot to think it's McDonald's fault you dumped coffee on yourself. Whose fault is it if you get bleach in your eye doing the laundry?

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    4. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      She spilt it.. end of story. Are we going to sue Clorox and have a court force them to dilute their bleach because its too harmful and people only expected it to sting their eye instead of causing major injuries?

      She was negligent in her handling of the liquid and its her fault if she didn't know how hot it was before acting foolishly with the coffee.

      I can guarantee you there are plenty of common consumer items that alot people have misconceptions of. People really need to quit pretending that someone else is going to save their skins and be diligent in their actions.

  2. Yeah, that makes sense by bobalu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Make sure they can't place a phone call to *anyone* because the 911 mechanism is affected. So now even if they can give their address verbally they can't call.

    Brilliant, but there's the FCC at work.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:Yeah, that makes sense by rhendershot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't be pedantic.

      I reject the assertion that we are talking about people's lives. Our local constabulary recently published in the local newspaper a reminder for folks to NOT use 911 to find out why the emergency sirens were tooting. Look; you'll see that a LOT of 911 traffic is not of a real emergency nature.

      Sometimes it is necessary to just let people do what they will do. If VoIP -not a PHONE service- ever becomes a major particulate of the basic communications service that people use, THEN we might have a rationale for the FCC to mandate E911 for Internet Phone.

      While it remains VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL its no more substantive than walkie talkies or ARRL Radio or FAX (just another of many communications channels) or even eMail or Instant Messaging for that matter....

      The Hard Deadline is just a way for the FCC to be successful in its mandate with little time for VoIP providers to coalesce into a significant opposition.

      ---
      I speak only for myself as an American citizen.

  3. That'll teach 'em... by moviepig.com · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...100,000 are yet to respond and had faced the termination of their service.

    So, in an emergency, not only can't they call 911, they can't even ring the house next door.

    (The thing about a cheap shot is that the price is always right...)

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  4. Spock Claims It Illogical by The+Dobber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fantastic logic, that FCC.

    Since you haven't acknowledged the 911 issue, we're gonna disconnect your phone.

    Maybe the Surgeon General should adopt the same tactic for smoking, ripping out your lungs for refusing to acknoledge the dangers of cigarettes.

    This shit can only be brought to us by the same fun filled people who gave us the Iraqi war.

  5. regulations screwing up VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    now the only people who can get into VoIP are the rich companies or companies that made their bucket of cash already becuase of ever increasing regulations and other bullcrap from the government. this also affects our ability to get dirt cheap plans as well.

    VoIP cannot be trusted for emergencies.. what if your DSL or cable modem goes out? it seems like that this should be common sense, but becuase it isn't, instead of people being smart enough to keep their landlines around for emergencies, we have this insane stuff going on now.

    1. Re:regulations screwing up VoIP by abhinavmodi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      VoIP cannot be trusted for emergencies.. what if your DSL or cable modem goes out?

      May be not in most of the current deployments .. But when you get IP connectivity through a (gig)Ethernet port in your wall, directly connected to the Telco/SP's equipment, this should not be an issue.

  6. Deceptive Marketing? by bsd4me · · Score: 3, Insightful

    he killed her own child by signing up for a service that didn't fit her needs.

    Ok, you cancel your landline and buy a mobile phone. The mobile phone doesn't work in your area. DO you sue T-Mobile?

    I think the real problem is that VoIP is being marketed as a replacement as replacement for normal phone service. I don't recall any mobile phone commericals that say "Buy a wireless phone and drop your phone service," but I do recall ones that say "Buy VoIP from is and drop your normal phone service."

    I think the average person here knows about the problems with VoIP, but I doubt the average person does. Also, what about people who dial 911 from a VoIP phone who don't know its a VoIP phone (eg, you have a heart attach and a friend calls 911).

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  7. Please Hold for the Fire Department by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I advise the NYC City Council's Tech committee, which oversees City laws about such things. We had a hearing last year about E911/VoIP, at which several telco execs (RBOCs and VoIP) testified, including Citron, Vonage CEO. They all assured us this wasn't a big problem, that only a few people hadn't registered their location with the website, that though their technical overhead in doing it right was huge, they were doing a good job anyway, voluntarily, please don't hurt us with your laws, don't make VoIP a "phone company" by law.

    I've had Vonage for a couple of years. My mobile phone service is totally reliable in my apartment, and it's the phone I'd use in an emergency - it's my backup if my dual-WAN for my Vonage phone were to somehow fail (like another giant, long blackout). So I didn't register my 911 location with Vonage. Last year, a few months after the hearing, I got an email requesting I register. I tried to do so on their website, but the form failed. I emailed them with a problem report. They emailed back, a real person offering to take my info in reply email and they're enter it for me. I blew it off to see what would happen. No one ever contacted me again, though there was now a live person at Vonage who knew that my info wasn't in the system, though I wanted it to be. They didn't follow up on the common case of their reply getting lost in email glitches. I'm sure that at least tens of thousands of other New Yorkers with Vonage also had no E911 location info registered, but always believed they could pick up their phone and dial 911 just like a regular phone. Which, in a dangerous city like NYC, with regular crime, fires, blackouts, planebombs, and the highest level of terrorist activity/risk in the USA, is an unacceptable risk.

    Last month I got a barrage of email from Vonage, facing the FCC deadline, insisting that I register or waive registration. Twice a day. And automated phonecalls. Threatening to cut off my service if I didn't register. So I did. But it was very long overdue.

    Vonage has had my phone number for two years. They should have had the automated calls, prompting me to register or waive, right from the beginning. The telephone adapter box should ring the phone every time it's power cycled (relocated), asking me to go to the website, or finally to speak my name and address (or waiver) into a recording, which Vonage transcribes to their database. Transcription costs something like $0.25 for an address; Vonage could tack that charge on my bill. Why don't they do it? Because they don't care, until the FCC threatens to take away their toy.

    "We don't care. We don't have to care. We're the phone company." - Evangeline (as played by Lilly Tomlin)

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  8. Definition of irony: by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being disconnected from 911 because you refused to acknowledge a letter saying that you run the risk of being disconnected from 911 if you rely on VOIP.

    Only a world-class bureaucracy could come up with this idea.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.