NSF Ponders New And Improved Internet
diorcc wrote to mention a Wired article about a NSF Project that could completely rebuild the Internet as we know it. From the article: "The National Science Foundation is backing a major initiative that could lead to a completely new internet architecture, with built-in security measures and support for ubiquitous sensors and wireless communications devices, among other things. The Global Environment for Networking Investigations, or GENI, will include a research grant program to fund new architectures and an experimental facility, which has not yet been planned in detail."
Let's name it "Internet 2!"
Maybe we could even call it... Internet2!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
They're rebuilding the internet to make it more secure, eliminate spam, virus, spoofing and so on.
Bad News:
Initiative will use Microsoft programming techniques as its foundation.
:-) :-)
{just joking}
If it had a version of napster running on it that the RIAA couldn't disrupt or bust people for using it might even get some use.
Sure they helped give us some nukes to kill a wraith ship but I still think they're bad.
Hell I didnt even know they had a internet.
The current version has clearly been a complete failure. Maybe if they start over from scratch, this Internet thing will actually become popular.
In related news, industry analysts have examined the expected content of this "new & improved" web, and have decided to call it the "National Science Foundation Web", or "NSFW" for short. When asked for comment, an official replied "finally, the Internet will have a name that accurate reflects the majority of its content."
If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
NSF? NSF what? Not safe for what? Not safe for work? Not safe for eyes? Not safe for consumption?
All I'm seeing here is NSF Ponders and I'm not even sure what a Ponder is and what wouldn't be safe for it.
These safety bulletins are getting severely lacking here on Slashdot these days.
I'm pretty sure they're talking about finally adding the evil bit to packet headers so firewalls can much more easily ferret out bad traffic.
Jerry
http://www.cyvin.org/
For some reason all I could think of after that was the phrase 'Internet Explorer and CSS Support'... (That said, I still mainly agree with the idea).