Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Intel Replies to AMD Antitrust Lawsuits

Posted by Zonk on from the let's-get-it-on dept.

pr1000 writes "The New York Times is reporting today that Intel has replied sharply to AMD's lawsuit. This lawsuit sounds like it will be a bruiser." From the article: "The claims are factually incorrect and contradictory...The evidence will show that every failure and setback for which A.M.D. today seeks to blame Intel is actually a direct result of A.M.D.'s own actions or inactions."

3 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. A bruiser? by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 5, Funny

    More like a playground argument.

    "You did it!"
    "No YOU did it!"
    "No YOU did it!"
    repeat ad nauseam

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  2. Took them nine weeks? by kihjin · · Score: 4, Funny
    Intel's formal response came nine weeks after A.M.D. accused Intel of unfair pricing and rebates, and of coercing customers to prevent them from using A.M.D. microprocessors. At 63 pages, the Intel rebuttal was 15 pages longer than the lawsuit itself.
    ... time for an upgrade?
    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
  3. Obligatory Family Guy Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    El Dorado Executive - Listen Peter, the last thing we want is for kids to start smoking
    Peter - Well, what about that graph that says "The first thing we want is for kids to start smoking" *points to said graph*
    EDE - That? Oh that's just something my son made in art class
    Peter - Oh yeah? Well what about that sign that says "The graph was NOT made in art class. We really DO want kids to start smoking" *points to said sign*