Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Intel Replies to AMD Antitrust Lawsuits

Posted by Zonk on from the let's-get-it-on dept.

pr1000 writes "The New York Times is reporting today that Intel has replied sharply to AMD's lawsuit. This lawsuit sounds like it will be a bruiser." From the article: "The claims are factually incorrect and contradictory...The evidence will show that every failure and setback for which A.M.D. today seeks to blame Intel is actually a direct result of A.M.D.'s own actions or inactions."

1 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Obligatory Family Guy Quote by Otter · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Hmmm, I think this tells us about the nature of the legal analysis we're going to be seeing here for the next few years: Proof By Family Guy Cigarette Episode Reference versus Proof By South Park Cigarette Episode Reference.

    At least it's a change from Proof By Chewbacca. That wasn't even funny in the original show, let alone when all 7,000 SCO articles here had some dork rolling out "Darl...Chewbacca...hahahahahahaha!!!"

    --
    What I'm listening to now on Pandora...