Slashdot Mirror


All About Geocaching?

It doesn't come easy wonders: "While surfing the net, I ran across this commentary on Geocaching by Erin Joyce. My wife is keen on trying Geocaching one of these days and I began to wonder if anyone on Slashdot participates in this pastime? If you do, what do you use (equipment-wise) and what's your opinion on the sport?"

80 comments

  1. Satellite-assisted wandering by the+darn · · Score: 1

    I've been geocaching occasionally for almost 2 years now, and it is a blast! I use a Magellan Meridian Gold for my adventures, and even have a (very easy-to-find) cache of my own called Under Fire.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un post.
  2. Have you tried the FAQ? by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nifty little FAQ right here.

    Personally, I think it's fun, except when I see a lot of people walking noisily to a location, with a handheld GPS out in the open, etc. The idea is to be circumspect and enjoy the environment or the weird urban places you visit, not how quickly you can cross a cache off your list as a hit. And when you're obvious about it, people who aren't geocachers might go looking for the cache and destroy it or walk off with it. It happens a lot.

    1. Re:Have you tried the FAQ? by daviqh · · Score: 0

      I agree, as it is much better to geocache lesser known places, as it is more fun to go un-disturbed.

      --
      Microsoft is like...no, it's much worse.
    2. Re:Have you tried the FAQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urban? No. The idea is to enjoy the pacific, wild places you visit.

    3. Re:Have you tried the FAQ? by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Urban? No. The idea is to enjoy the pacific, wild places you visit.


      Some of the "virtual cache" places in urban areas are cool.
  3. I've gone a few times by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My equipment: PocketPC with Bluetooth, NavMan GPS Bluetooth module, iGuidance mapping software for urban/vehicle Geocaching, Maptech Pocket Navigator for foot/bicycle. You want good hiking software; sometimes following coordinates alone can lead you through the bushes, when there was a perfectly good trail coming from the other direction! Depending on your target- boats and folding shovels are optional. Sometimes a calculator is good for finding that next waypoint in some of the more puzzle-style caches; I just keep a copy of DIV calculator on the PDA.

    Of course, I'm into the tech- technically, all you need is one of those cheap $50 recievers that gives you your current coordinates, speed and direction. But that's doing it the hard way.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:I've gone a few times by artifex2004 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Of course, I'm into the tech- technically, all you need is one of those cheap $50 recievers that gives you your current coordinates, speed and direction. But that's doing it the hard way.


      For some of us, it's the fun way, the more adventurous way. Go find that path. While you're looking around, you might learn a lot more about the place you're in, whether it be a park, a shopping center parking lot, etc.
    2. Re:I've gone a few times by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I like Chavez- his "danger" is that he's an example to say, poor black people from Louisianna.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:I've gone a few times by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And if you have the time, my equipment will let you do that too- it's a menu option in most of the software, but it's also a separate free application with the Bluetooth GPS driver.

      My one problem, I've yet to find a good way to carry everything- I'm thinking about putting some velcro on the shoulder of my ScottEVest so I get better GPS data (just velcro the GPS unit to my shoulder, turn it on and off I go).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:I've gone a few times by sporktoast · · Score: 2, Informative


      If you think that you want a shovel to geocache, you'd probably better re-read the listing guidelines:
      "Caches may be quickly archived if we see the following ... Caches that are buried. If a shovel, trowel or other 'pointy' object is used to dig, whether in order to hide or to find the cache, then it is not appropriate."

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    5. Re:I've gone a few times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, that's where simplicity rules. Armed with just a simple GPS receiver you can still find the caches, but you don't have to worry about battery life so much and you only need to carry one device the size of a cellphone. If you have to have the map (which really is a luxury, not a necessity), there are integrated GPS receivers which have that too.

    6. Re:I've gone a few times by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      You want good hiking software; sometimes following coordinates alone can lead you through the bushes, when there was a perfectly good trail coming from the other direction!

      I'll trust that to be up to date and complete when Hell freezes over.

      But that's doing it the hard way.

      Going on a roundabout walk through marked trails seems harder than making a beeline for the cache. You sound like a typical city slicker. :^)

      Speaking of easy, why not just log the find without ever visiting it?

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    7. Re:I've gone a few times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear sir,

      Your homepage engages in unlawful capitalism. Please cease these activities immediately.

      Your friend,
      Fidel

  4. Good times. by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've only done it a few times, but I've enjoyed it quite a bit. It's a decent excuse to get "out" and do something. I've actually learned a lot more about the area I live in so far by going to places I wouldn't think to. It's a good way to find those little 'out of the way' parks and such.

    I use a Magellan Meridian Pro. Does a decent job for my purposes.

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  5. Staff too long!They're digging in the wrong place! by Leontes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Geocaching is a marriage of technology and the real world.

    It's treasure hunting. The idea that there are thousands upon thousands of hidden capsules with little pieces of plastic, burned cds full of pictures, half used disposable cameras hidden in urban and rural settings hints towards a magical realm which is only available to those who are willing to look.

    The possiblities and types of caches are endless. It is an excuse to explore your outside world is terrific. It will not appeal to everyone, nor should it, but it is a way of exploring the world that does very little harm.

  6. Also see: Letterboxing by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    A closely related sport/pastime is Letterboxing.
    Letterboxing is less tech, more puzzle solving.
    Both get you out of the house looking for hidden "treasures".

    Also see: Armchair Treasure Hunting, where you solve puzzles, usually in a book, to find REAL treasure buried or hidden somewhere.
    Examples: Masquerade, David Blaine's Mysterious Stranger, etc.

    I'd provide links, but given the topic, you should be able to find your own way with just some clues!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Also see: Letterboxing by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Mod this up!

      Letterboxing (.org if you are too lazy to google) is great fun, and I'd venture to say somewhat more challenging IMHO than Geocaching, since you aren't given exact coordinates. Rather, you get clues (look for the 10th tree, go west 100 paces, etc) which can be rather fun to figure out, and sometimes downright frustrating.

      Definitely a fun time.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  7. Great Family time by Darnit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and 3.5 year old son go with me every tuesday to Geocache. It is our family night. We just moved and without Geocaching we would not have seen all the parks and trails in the area.

    We use a Magellan SportTrak for our adventures.

    I work for a defense contractor that makes GPS units for the military but I haven't taken one of the handheld units out for a test drive yet.

  8. Navicache.com by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

    I personally was seriously turned off by the terms of service of the commercial "geocache.com"[1] (complete with the traditional "all your copyright are belong to us" provisions and "only premium subscribers can see this cache data" sections, and the proprietary fit (my potentially uninformed interpretation) they seem to have thrown about Their data being plotted for geocachers at Buxley's Maps site, but the sport itself is a huge amount of fun.

    Although they don't yet have as many cache sites in their database as the "geocache.com" site, Navicache does have worldwide coverage and a much friendlier attitude (more of a "you are providing the cache data, it belongs to YOU" kind of attitude, and more like a "gift shop" business model than geocache.com's "tollbooth" one).

    As far as equipment: A "Garmin Etrex Legend" (eventually to be replaced with something else - the Garmin's okay but I want one that I can more easily 'hack' to make it operate my own maps, etc.) and a laptop running Slackware with GPSDrive - the waypoint database of which is loaded with the entire Navicache.com set plus the USGS GNIS data for reference.

    [1]They're not doing anything ILLEGAL or anything. It's just that I almost get the feeling that they feel they "own" the whole sport and the rights to it. They have every right to their "tollbooth-style" business model - it just feels like the wrong attitude to me when the sport is really maintained by the enthusiasts themselves, so I don't use them personally.

    1. Re:Navicache.com by electrichamster · · Score: 1
      GPSDrive - the waypoint database of which is loaded with the entire Navicache.com set
      Can I ask where you managed to pull all the data for this from? I'd love to do the same!
    2. Re:Navicache.com by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      The interface is described in This thread in the Navicache forums. Just pass it the relevant information in the query and you get back an XML file with the data. When it first came out, I had to write a script to parse and import it, but it looks like the current GPSBabel understands the layout of the file natively, if you have space to dump the entire batch into your GPS unit. I grabbed the entire set some time ago, and now just periodically fetch "caches added or updated since" the last time I updated.

      As for the GNIS reference data (the USGS-published database of populated places, natural features, radio towers, etc.), they can be downloaded state-by-state from here. For those living or just visiting outside of the US, another US agency also publishes a somewhat less comprehensive but still useful set of location data for various features downloadable from here, and, finally, if you want to play with street map data in the US, the US Census Bureau publishes the "TIGER/Line" data - at least when the census bureau site is accessible...

      All of those latter data sources are in the public domain, being publications of the US Government, so they are Legally Free. (Perhaps an odd contrast for a government frequently accused of being bought-and-paid-for by wealthy corporations to the detriment of its citizens - whereas most countries thought of as less at the beck and call of businesses seem to all charge a fortune for this kind of data...) I find them handy for generating my own maps.

    3. Re:Navicache.com by sporktoast · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, the parental/ownership attitude about the sport from the Groundspeak folks has cooled my interest a bit. That and the indefinite moratorium on Locationless (Reverse Virtual) caches. I thought they were some of the more interesting things to seek.

      Also, they recently launched www.waymarking.com, which I guess is where most of the non-standard caches will go. Right now, only Geocaching.com Premium members can get in for a look. That's fine, but the site doesn't even tell the public ANYTHING about what is going to be there. All pages, including "contact us" link back to the same "check back in a couple of weeks" message. No other explanations.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    4. Re:Navicache.com by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      Aside from Navicache I THINK there are a few other geocaching location sites out there as well, though I haven't looked recently. (I'm quite happy thus far with Navicache). I'd be very interested, though, to know what anyone thinks of any of the other sites aside from the obvious "geocache.com" site as well.

    5. Re:Navicache.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they seem to be running on MS .NET framework, so I'm sure if you feel like trying, you can get in and take a look around even without an account.

  9. Mobile Geocaching is also possible by hacker · · Score: 1
    Don't forget you can also Geocache with your Palm device, using Plucker and these instructions. There are some other methods, but this one works without violating their TOS.

    There's also some details on finding your cache with your Palm + Plucker over here as well.

    I may cook up a little mod_perl app that allows people to upload their .gpx file to convert to Plucker format at some point in the future if there is enough demand for it.

    Any requests for something like that?

  10. My Equipment and Experiences by elkyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I personally love to go geocaching. I am not into a lot of outdoors-type activities, such as camping, etc., but I have a blast geocaching! Equipment-wise, I use a Garmin eTrex Vista, Palm Tungsten T3, and (on longer caching days) my Acer Aspire 1362LCi laptop.

    In terms of software, I use GSAK (Geocaching Swiss Army Knife, http://gsak.net/) for the majority of data manipulation and transferal, and Garmin MapSource (with Topographical Maps) to do mapping and routing stuff. On my Palm I use CacheMate (http://www.smittyware.com/palm/cachemate/), which provides a cache-oriented interface, not just an html viewer, although some are satisfied with offline version of the cache description pages.

    I do subscribe to the premium service at geocaching.com. The main benefit of this is that you can create specific search queries, and have them emailed to you (on a schedule) in GPX format (too lazy to look up acronym, but it is an XML file) that you can then import into GSAK/MapSource. I have also bought licences for GSAK and Cachemate; as much as the Slashdot community is against spending any money at all, I feel that it is the Right Thing to do. The authors provide wonderful programs, with free demos (fully functional indefinitely, IIRC in the case of GSAK). Also, these people are independent software authors trying to make a living, not $EvilCorporation. I think that nowadays, each of the software products runs $20-30, along with the $3/mo or $30/yr premium membership to GC.com.

    I would like to note that you do not *have* to pay/buy anything (other than a GPS device) to have fun Geocaching (contrary to some implications by previous posters). As with most hobbies, you can spend as little ($400 for top of the line GPS, subscriptions, and more) as you want/are able to.

    Geocaching is a fun activity for people of all age ranges: I know cachers of ages from 3 to their 70s. I know many families enjoy caching as a family activity; in a medium-sized city, there are bound to be caches that even kids can find.

    Final words of advice: Get a good Silva-style compass and learn how to use it. In dense woods, your GPS may become useless within 100 feet of the cache (i.e. your accuracy is so low) that it is sometimes best to stop when the GPS says 100-150 feet, take a bearing on the compass, and use that to try to find the cache.

    Oh, and, please please please DON'T leave McDonald's toys as trade items at a cache. Everyone hates them, and they are (mostly) worthless.

    1. Re:My Equipment and Experiences by PittCaleb · · Score: 1

      Excellent description ElKyle. One can buy a $99 GPS from their local camp store and cache without a membership from Geocaching.com or spend $500 on a GPS, use a top-of-the-line Palm and associated software. The hobby is as placid or extreme as you want to make it.

      Some people hunt out historical markers, others shoto for caches that require miles long hikes through dense brush or require a half-day canoe trip. It's all about personal preference.

      Cheers,
      PittCaleb

  11. Why it's fun by klossner · · Score: 1
    I've found 850 geocaches in the last two years, so my family and I are into it pretty deep. "The game where you are the search engine." Here are some of the less obvious attractions:

    • Hunting caches takes me to interesting places that I would never have seen otherwise. Pocket parks, public art works, secret waterfalls, funky neighborhoods.

    • It's a community. Many of my friends are people I've met through geocaching, often at "event caches." After three decades of working in high-tech, it's nice to hang with people who can converse about something other than Windows vs Linux.

    • Once you have a GPS receiver, there are no expenses beyond the occasional tank of gas. Nobody's trying to sell you anything.
    I used a $100 starter GPSr for a year, then moved up to a Garmin 60CS with the add-on map software. It's also useful for navigating in the car.
    1. Re:Why it's fun by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      * Hunting caches takes me to interesting places that I would never have seen otherwise. Pocket parks, public art works, secret waterfalls, funky neighborhoods.
      * It's a community. Many of my friends are people I've met through geocaching, often at "event caches." After three decades of working in high-tech, it's nice to hang with people who can converse about something other than Windows vs Linux.

      That about sums it up for me. The events are probably one of the most enjoyable parts of geocaching. There certainly is a diverse bunch of cacher out there!
      Nobody's trying to sell you anything.
      Except Premium Meberships :-)


      Free and Open Geocaching (well, for Australia/NZ)

      --
      Burma?
  12. I love geocaching! by GeekNJ · · Score: 1

    Started geocaching with a Garmin GPS V and since upgraded to a Garmin GPSMap 76CS. Unless you're sure you'll like it, it doesn't really matter what GPS you get - they will all get you to a cache. GPS with mapping and auto routing can provide directions to the cache location like you'd get with Hertz Neverlost, but once you're out of the car, all GPS units will point you in the same direction. Depending on where you live, there are different types of caches. By me in Northern NJ you have some drive up micro caches with lots in local parks. But my favorite are the ones in County and State parks like Ramapo, Harriman and Bear Mountain among others where you can park and hike for 10-15 miles and log a few (to a dozen) caches. Geocaching has made me a huge fan of hiking.

  13. Yum! by Daxster · · Score: 1

    Geocaching is lots of fun, and caches are everywhere! There's even a few on mt. kilomanjaro.
    I just use my eyes and a fairly cheap (less than $400 CAD) handheld GPS. The sport is designed to be easy and not requiring a lot of equipment, yet still be entertaining..so what more help do you need? Go out there and do it :)

    --
    Death by snoo-snoo!
  14. Another "Good Times" Reply by Randolpho · · Score: 1

    Well, I've only geocached a few times (I borrowed a friend's GPS, then lost access to it when I moved), but I have to say it's a blast. All you really need is a GPS and some comfortable hiking clothes, but it helps to a wireless internet connection device of some sort with you if you want to do more than one on a trip. Although printing my destinations out before a trip worked for me.

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  15. I tried plucker, and was sorely disappointed. by schon · · Score: 1

    I found plucker to be nearly useless for geocaching.. at best, it was way too much trouble to be worth it.

    I found Geotoad and Cachemate are a much saner way to go.

    Cachemate isn't free (or Free), but if you're dropping a couple hundred (at a minimum) for a GPS+PDA, the extra $10 is definitely worth it.

    1. Re:I tried plucker, and was sorely disappointed. by hacker · · Score: 1
      I found plucker to be nearly useless for geocaching.. at best, it was way too much trouble to be worth it.

      You must be using it in a very odd way, there are literally THOUSANDS of Geocachers who prefer to use Plucker for this, because the output file from the various Geocaching sites is XML, or easily converted to HTML from whatever format it is in.

      Works great for everyone else. What did you find "useless" about it?

    2. Re:I tried plucker, and was sorely disappointed. by schon · · Score: 1

      there are literally THOUSANDS of Geocachers who prefer to use Plucker for this

      Uh, yeah. Then you'll have no problem pointing me to the place where this was discussed by those THOUSANDS, right?

      And as the old saying goes, "Eat shit, 50 billion flies can't be wrong!"

      the output file from the various Geocaching sites is XML

      Umm, no, the output from Geocaching.com is HTML, not XML.

      What did you find "useless" about it?

      Besides the fact that Plucker's interface (on the palm) blows large, stinky goats, I hated having to edit the config file in order to tell it which caches I wanted (which meant visiting the website and selecting the cache pages) then dealing with the necessary levels of 'recursion' in order to get the correct amount of information, without Plucker attempting to download the entire internet.

      What, exactly, do you have with a tool (like Geotoad) that's designed to do a specific job, and which does it well?

  16. Stuff I use by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    GPS equipment:
    I've used a Garmin GPS 45 (OOOOLD!!!), Garmin eMap (very nice unit - too bad it's discontinued), and Lowrance iFinder (Looks great on paper - SD expansion, "hot" receiver, numerous other nifty features, but TBH it sucks. Their MapCreate software for uploading map data to the unit SUCKS. It can't even do turn-by-turn routing on your PC, at least Garmin MapSource can do routing on the PC and then upload a route that won't clutter the unit with lots of trash waypoints, even if the unit itself can't do onboard TBT routing.)

    For a good hiking unit I'd stick with Garmin or Magellan. Garmin is the most evil with regards to proprietary add-ons, but honestly after my experiences with the Lowrance I'd stay with them anyway. The Garmin units are very polished and work very well. (Note: Magellans could be excellent too, I want to try one one of these days. Just do NOT buy Lowrance!)

    Other equipment:
    Kyocera 6035 PalmOS PDA-phone, replaced last March with a Treo 600. I use GPX Spinner to convert emailed GPX files to HTML, and then plucker-build to convert these to Plucker format. (Yes, I have a geocaching.com subscription - it's worth the money.) Spinner is Windows-only but works fine for me with WINE.

    Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop with DeLorme Topo USA. TUSA is GREAT. I can see all nearby geocaches for miles around. Usually the way things work is that on family vacations, we pick a hiking trail for the day. As time permits, I use the laptop to view caches near our route to the trailhead (and also near/on the trail itself) and the Kyo or Treo to look up cache descriptions. The laptop stays in the car, of course.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Stuff I use by tengwar · · Score: 1

      Caveat on Garmin: I have a Garmin Geko 101 which I bought for some solo walking in arctic Sweden. I found that when I set a location, the coordinates would be silently altered by 2-3 miles as I left that page. I don't know whether this affects all coordinate systems or just the Swedish national grid, or whether the change is still of this size: however this bug could have lethal consequences if you don't notice it. BTW, the report of the current position seemed accurate.

    2. Re:Stuff I use by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I've never had anything remotely like that happen with my eMap or my dad's GPS 45. That sounds very weird.

      You mean when bookmarking your current position? Could be some weird map datum inconsistency...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Stuff I use by tengwar · · Score: 1

      > You mean when bookmarking your current position? Could be some weird map datum inconsistency... No, when entering a point which I'm going to navigate to. My guess is that they only tested it with the US Grid.

  17. Definitely a universal rule for geocaching by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
    Caches that are buried. If a shovel, trowel or other 'pointy' object is used to dig, whether in order to hide or to find the cache, then it is not appropriate.

    Not just the "geocache.com" listings either, in case it isn't obvious to anyone - "burying" a cache (partially or otherwise - basically anything that requires cutting into the ground) seems to be universally considered, at the very least, "bad etiquette" (and is quite probably illegal on a lot of public land). Cache placement should disturb the area as little as possible.

    ("Remember, you should not have to needlessly bush-whack into an area to place your cache, and others should not have to bush-whack to find it and burying a cache on public managed lands is forbidden and against geocaching etiquette (not to mention plain old common sense!)."

    1. Re:Definitely a universal rule for geocaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the "geocache.com" listings either, in case it isn't obvious to anyone - "burying" a cache (partially or otherwise - basically anything that requires cutting into the ground) seems to be universally considered, at the very least, "bad etiquette" (and is quite probably illegal on a lot of public land). Cache placement should disturb the area as little as possible.

      But there's nothing against burying claymores around the cache, is there?

  18. I found one by accident by jimmypw · · Score: 1

    When i was about 15 i stumbled apun one of these geocaching boxes when i was in my local woods with a friend.
    It completly shocked us at first it was an ammobox with geocacache written on the side under a dead tree. We didnt know what to knink of it at first. I thought it was somthing to do with the GPS system so at first we were reluctant to open it. However after much debate we opened it and its like a treasurechest. People leave some really cool stuff in ther from time to time. As so we didnt ruin the game we signed the book explaining how we came about the box and swaped some stuff that was availible. From what i remember there were some small orniments, old train tickets, a bottle of liqor, some stickers, a copy of suse linux and some other goodies. It seemed like a really fun thing to do so i read the letter explaining what geocaching was all about and i was facinated. Since that day about 5 years ago i have wanted to get a GPS reciever but i havent been able to afford one as yet. I had actually forgotten about it since then and after seeing this article had reminded me what it was. Now that i have some money saved and a lot of student time on my hands i may get a GPS reciever to play along.

    In summery Geocaching looks as if it could be great fun for either an individual, group of friends or even a family and it is also a great excuse to get some excercise and fresh air.

  19. Fun Pastime by DJDutcher · · Score: 1
    I've been geocaching a few times. I use a very simple GPS which only shows me the distance and bearing to a waypoint, and I was able to find the location of all the the caches I went looking for. I use a Garmin Forerunner which I bought to measure speed and distance while I run. Its a nice unit for running because its so small, but it doesn't have great navigation freatures, but it goes to show you can go geocaching with a simple GPS unit.

    I live near Minneapolis MN, and last fall I drove up to Duluth MN to do some geocaching out of town. It was really just an excuse to go on a short road trip, but finding the caches was a fun time, and it took me to some parks and scenic views I probably would not have been to otherwise.

  20. Geocaching by erica_ann · · Score: 1

    I have been geocaching with my husband and son now for over 4 years. I love it ! It is a puzzle, it can be very physically challenging, it is a great family pastime. We use a GPS - Garmin Etrex, our laptop and add in a Delorme mapping program. Finding the cache is heartwarming to do. We have seen all sorts of "trinkets" go all over the world. When we find it, we take a trinket and replace one with ours. It is interesting to see what all is out there!

    Find a site, find a clue, and go hunt!

    PS I always think it is neat to write the date, name and city/state you are in on the trinket if you can. that way, X amount of years when that trinket goes around the world or from cache to cache, if you happen to get it back again or if someone else does that knows you, it is so neat to see!!

    1. Re:Geocaching by tambo · · Score: 1
      I started out with a Garmin eTrex Legend (cheap $125, durable and simple) and just recently upgraded to a Garmin GPS Map 60CS. I absolutely love this thing!!

      Just a comment about this:

      Higher-end devices are often more accurate, more detailed, more full-featured, and equipped with brighter, more vibrant displays. They also have a drawback: You won't want to use them for geocaching. While geocaching, you will climb up and down steep embankments, pick through dirty areas, and ford streams. Are you comfortable risking damage to a $100 device? How about a $500 device?

      (Also note: That bright, color display will eat up batteries fast. I've had the misfortune of being near a geocache and having my GPS device die. Not fun.)

      What you need for geocaching are reasonably accurate lat/long coordinates and a compass. Most bottom-of-the-line devices do both fine. The rest is costly window dressing and a distraction.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  21. Geeks and Gadjets by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    What self respecting gizmo-nerd WOULDN'T be in to geocaching??? I run a Garmin Geko and a Navman PiN for my cahcing goodness It's kind of an obsession.. be prepared to have large chunks of your spare time taken up with chasing tupperware....

    --
    Burma?
  22. geocaching: NOT fun by majid_aldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    geocacher 1: OMG!! i found something at this EXACT location!! WOW!
    geocacher 2: ALRIGHT!! now let's go to 47274.12N, 534.363E and we'll find something else "hidden"!!!

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    1. Re:geocaching: NOT fun by gatzke · · Score: 1

      It is not that damn easy.

      The non-military GPS system is not accurate, so you are usually at lease 30 feet off target.

      Trees obscure your sat signal, so you can often have troubles.

      Even when you use the cheat code for the cache to get the clues, it is sometimes hard to find just because the box is hidden, especially micro caches.

      My wife loves this stuff, and I like to hike, but finding some of those obscure caches is a pain in my ass.

    2. Re:geocaching: NOT fun by bluelip · · Score: 1

      I'd agree w/ you that the location isn't exact, but getting within 30' put darn close.

      All of this from just following your gps. There's no challenge to it.

      It's a good tool to learn how to use your GPS unit, but it gets boring quickly.

      I have and use a GPS, but I find it much more enjoyable to unfold a map and use that to locate trails and attractions.

      To each their own I guess.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    3. Re:geocaching: NOT fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An easy way to identify somebody who has never tried geocaching is that they say, "the GPS tells you exactly where the cache is, so it must be easy."

    4. Re:geocaching: NOT fun by AlistairGroves · · Score: 1

      In a way I sort of see what the parent says. Myself I'd much rather mark the location on a map and use traditional methods to find it. If you know what you're doing with a compass in a lot of areas you can get more accurate than gps. Only you have to work a bit more for it. I'm not disputing the fact that it's not as easy as follow the gps and then you're at the cache, but I'd much prefer the extra challenge of not using GPS. Far too often when taking people outdoors or teaching kids to navigate I see people up in the mountains, lost because their GPS batteries have run out. A couple of hours learning how to navigate, and my kids can find their way around without any problems :) And do some more work on micronavigation and they'll beat a GPS unit when in feature rich terrain. If I placed a geocache I'd put it somewhere where following a straight bearing would lead you into a rock face you can't go past and then have the gps signal crap out. That way you'd have to find your way from there to the cache using a compass ;)

  23. No GPS, just Google Earth! by Dont+tempt+me · · Score: 1

    You may be surprised, but I have found most of my recent geocaches without any GPS whatsoever. Just put the coords into Google Earth, and usually you can pick out something unique about it from the sky. It's a different approach, and keeps you from looking down during the hunt.

    --
    ----- I hate sigs.
    1. Re:No GPS, just Google Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://andyfowler.com/journal/2005/07/earthcache-g eocaching-for-google-earth/> EarthCache: Geocaching for Google Earth

  24. This word already has a definition. by Nailer · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's like I decided to call the act of watching television 'dressing myself'.

    Geocaching is transparently caching an origin server so that the content is being served from somewhere close to the person seeking it. It's what Akamai do for Microsoft and Yahoo and Apple etc. with their Linux boxes.

    Geocaching is not wandering around with a GPS.

    Pick another word.

    1. Re:This word already has a definition. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      And if I sound slightly annoyed there, that's because I expected an article and knowledgable comments on configuring Squid and BIND to perform geocaching. Not this unrelated random stuff.

    2. Re:This word already has a definition. by op00to · · Score: 1

      OK. Let's change 'geocaching' to 'NailerFellatesHorses'.

      Anyone going to find my NailerFellatesHorse today?

    3. Re:This word already has a definition. by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      OK. Let's change 'geocaching' to 'NailerFellatesHorses'

      The domain is available in all the major top levels (.com, .net, .org), so sounds good to me.

    4. Re:This word already has a definition. by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      I'll stop referring to the discussed activity as "Geocaching" as soon as you stop referring to UCE as "Spam" and hidden features of software or DVDs as "Easter Eggs." For that matter, stop calling the person who operates an aircraft as a "pilot." Depending on which version of English you speak, also please stop referring to the luggage compartment at the rear of your automobile as either a "boot" or a "trunk."

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    5. Re:This word already has a definition. by tambo · · Score: 1
      You don't appear to be annoyed. You appear to be a techno-snob.

      I posit that pastime names are like trademarks: priority is won by predominant use, not the earliest use. The predominant use of "geocaching" is for hiding and finding kits of stuff via latitude/longitude coordinates - not a technique in a niche techology. This predominance is clearly indicated by Google, by wikipedia, and by DNS entries for geocaching.

      Given these circumstances, your response does not constitute an interesting riposte, but merely portrays you in an unfavorable light.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    6. Re:This word already has a definition. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      There's no other computer term called spam. There's no other computer term called easter eggs. There is another computer term called geocaching.

      Obviously.

    7. Re:This word already has a definition. by Nailer · · Score: 1

      I saw an article about a topic. The article is about another topic that hijacked the word.

      Yes, language is dictated by use. It doesn't mean that the people used to the orginal definition of a word don't have thr right to be annoyed when the word is used to describe something else.

      If I'm a snob, your assumption that I don't have that right makes you a fascist. And portrays you in an unfavorable light.

    8. Re:This word already has a definition. by tambo · · Score: 1
      If I'm a snob, your assumption that I don't have that right makes you a fascist. And portrays you in an unfavorable light.

      You have an unfettered right to act as you wish. I was merely advising you how you appeared to some of us.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    9. Re:This word already has a definition. by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      Except that a computer is not strictly required to geocache. A GPS is. Or a really excellent set of maps. A geocache is a physical object located at map coordinates. Computers are used to facilitate geocaching, but geocache is not a computer term.

      Computers already have a few homonyms anyway, like "key". I press a key to create a letter, and I use a key to encrypt a letter to Grandma.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  25. Oh, you think I'm the one who called it that? by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would you tell me to pick another word?

    The name's been used for this since 2000. Even the whois for the domain name reports it was registered July 3rd of that year.

    Put "akamai geocaching" into Google. There's nothing about geographically-based content delivery, there, at least not on the front page. Put "geocaching" into the search engine at akamai.com: nothing there, either. And to answer your follow-up post, try "bind geocaching" and "squid geocaching," also. Guess what Webster's says?

    If I sound slightly annoyed, it's because I expected someone to do a little more thinking and research before telling me that hundreds of thousands of people are misusing the term. You're a little early for Troll Tuesday.

    1. Re:Oh, you think I'm the one who called it that? by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Why would you tell me to pick another word?

      I didn't. That was you as in 'vous'. The collective one. I just wanted to post on top of the thread.

      When I Google for geocaching, the first page is an article about the thing that's being talked about here, and it says the 'first thing I thought of was Akamai'. I expected you to do a little more research.

      People have been using geocaching as a type of caching since before 2000. I guess Akamai are tired of people using their term. A technical site with an article that promises to be all about, say, DNS, should say 'road DNS' if they mean 'Driving Near Stuff'.

    2. Re:Oh, you think I'm the one who called it that? by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      When I Google for geocaching, the first page is an article about the thing that's being talked about here, and it says the 'first thing I thought of was Akamai'. I expected you to do a little more research.


      I did. I don't get the same links you did, obviously. Please provide a link to the article you found on the front page of Google that refers to your definition of geocaching, since my search keeps bringing up the one I'm talking about.

      People have been using geocaching as a type of caching since before 2000. I guess Akamai are tired of people using their term. A technical site with an article that promises to be all about, say, DNS, should say 'road DNS' if they mean 'Driving Near Stuff'.


      Even if that explains why Akamai's own website doesn't list geocaching, it doesn't explain why a Google search of bind + geocaching or squid + geocaching turns up nothing, if those are commonly used with your definition.
    3. Re:Oh, you think I'm the one who called it that? by Nailer · · Score: 1

      The link I referred to was Google 'akamai geocaching'.

      If you search for NT on Google you might get lots of articles about Windows NT or the Northern Territory in Australia, or other uses of 'NT'. That doesn't make one of them wrong. Nor does it mean I should come up with an OS and call it NT.

  26. Geocaching Member by Technician · · Score: 1

    I use the same handle on the Geocaching site I use here. I have a cache hidden that has been in place since July 2001. Most caches don't last that long.
    I started with a Magellan GPS315. It doesn't have a base street map, so it's the one I now use with my laptop and TOPO maps. For laptop free use, I use the Magellan MAP330. It has the advantage of taking advantage of the WAAS signal that the 315 didn't. I like the sport because it gets you to some very interesting spots that you would never find on your own. It's like fishing and discovering all the great little known fishing holes.
    I was in Hawaii and the geocaching site had the best listing of fantastic hiking trails complete with photos. It was up to date and better than the typical tourist books. Virtual caches are some of the best ones to find.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  27. Garage Sale by CFMLSpecialist · · Score: 1

    I didn't hear about it until a year ago when a lady came to our garage sale looking for stuff to buy, hide, and add to the site. She bought a bunch of stuff and said she had been doing it for a very long time, sounded like something she really loved to do.

  28. Better than letterboxing :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, that reminds me (although I didnt care to look up the Letterboxing URL) of something we used to do as kids, we called it a "treasure hunt".

    Make 10 to 20 slips of paper, and arrange them in sequence such that the second points to the place where the third is hidden, the third points to the fourth, and so on, The first clue is given by hand. The last is usually some kind of novelty item that's the "treasure"! Or maybe even a voucher, or an invitation for dinner (get the idea).

    Spend the morning planning and planting the slips, and have a ball in the evening!! :)

  29. Overcaching? by zetes · · Score: 1

    In 2003 I got into geocaching bigtime. I was nearly at 100 by the end of last summer. Using a Garmin Legend, I became a fanatic. I went to the Indiana Geocachers picnics and had a blast. I think it is a very fun hobby, great for families and singles/couples alike. It truly gets you places you never would have thought to go.

    My one problem lately is the number of caches around. In my city, Bloomington, Indiana, the cache numbers within about 6-7 miles went from maybe 50-60 a year ago to over 120. That is just insane. There is a rails-to-trails project here and there are over 15 along a 3-4 mile series of trails.

    I think the point of caching, like several have indicated here, is to go out to neat areas, find a couple caches, and witness some place you have never been. But with the popularity growing, it seems that more people are just about the numbers. This causes more demand, and makes cache-hiders put more out, inundating a region.

    This phenomenon is perhaps great for kids and families - "Hey mom, I just found my 537th in 3 weeks!" But I think it ruins the sport if it gets to crazy and too frequent of caches.

    I have not done much caching this summer due to this growth. And actually, one thing I find truly fun is Benchmarking. The National Geodetic Survey has benchmarks (usually metallic disks) all throughout the country for surveying purposes. And the Geocaching.som site has links to all recorded objects. It is an alternative hobby to go find them, log your find/no-find on geocaching.com, and if you want, report it to NGS.

    This hobby seems much more fulfilling to me, and you can be assured that the number of these things will not grow exponentially like rabbits.

    Anyways, just my two cents. I think it is a fun activity none-the-less, so have at it!

    Z

    PS: Other equipment to consider: bug spray, whistle (especially if alone), walkie-talkies for spreading out with your friend/fam, flashlight for cave/rock caches, pocket knife, calamine lotion, and I always wear pants, even if it is hot, to avoid bugs/plants.

    --
    2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2
  30. Geocaching by braatenm · · Score: 1

    I've been Geocaching for just over a year. I started out with a Garmin eTrex Legend (cheap $125, durable and simple) and just recently upgraded to a Garmin GPS Map 60CS. I absolutely love this thing!! For suggestions on what to buy to fit your needs and what to avoid I would suggest looking at the Groundspeak forums. http://forums.groundspeak.com/ Hope this helps.

    --
    Regards, Mike
  31. And for the UK? by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points this week!

    Does anybody know any similar sources of information for the UK?

    I once managed to download a list of speed camera lat/long co-ords, but street map data would be amazing.

    --
    http://blog.grcm.net/
  32. Re:Staff too long!They're digging in the wrong pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this might sound odd... you could use this idea w/ trade..

  33. Wait, you're complaining... by TBone · · Score: 1

    ...that a company which offers a free service - completely free to both retrieve and list caches - has a TOS that prevents you from using their data outside of your personal and non-distributed use and plasters their name all over the place?

    It's free. The only features you get if you pay are convenience features, like the ability to generate cache lists to move into mobile devices and GPSr's. The most restrictive parts of their TOS refer to two parts - the site engine/layout/content itself with the exception of the third-party submissions, and the method of access (no spidering).

    Seriously, if that's such a draconian TOS for you, you probably need to cancel your Yahoo!, GMail, LiveJournal, MSN, and internet accounts, and any of thos other "free" services that use your web habits as trade.

    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U