Slashdot Mirror


Half-Terabyte Hard Drive Reviewed

EconolineCrush writes "The Tech Report has posted an in-depth review of Hitachi's half-terabyte Deskstar 7K500, the largest hard drive available on the market. The drive is compared with five of the latest drives from Maxtor, Seagate, and Western Digital, so the review serves as a good round-up of the fastest Serial ATA drives on the market. Performance testing is quite extensive, covering desktop applications, load times, file copy tests, multi-user workloads, disk-intensive multitasking, and even noise levels and power consumption."

30 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. How many floppies do I need to back this beast up? by RoterheadPro · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think my four banger calculator goes that high?

  2. Deathstars by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please tell me that these are not built on the same technology as the old IBM Deathstars.

    1. Re:Deathstars by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All of my Deathstars blew up like someone hit them with a torpedo or something.

  3. Re:full article mirror & comment by krgallagher · · Score: 2, Funny
    "How does Joe Sixpack back up 500Gb? That's an awful lot of digital pics & videos."

    It's almost big enough to hold my p0rn collection.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  4. Re:full article mirror & comment by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Funny

    How does Joe Sixpack back up 500Gb?

    With a second drive. Hopefully they'll be doing some sort of buy-one-get-one-free deal.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Re:full article mirror & comment by misleb · · Score: 4, Funny

    When does Joe Sixpack even consider backing up *any* data?

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  6. Re:full article mirror & comment by winkydink · · Score: 1, Funny

    not very useful if that drive is physically located in the same place and you live somewhere like, say, New Orleans.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  7. Two partitions by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joe Sixpack?

    He makes two partitions, uses 250GB for his working drive, and then uses ghost to mirror it to the second partition every couple of months. How can you lose?

    What you forgot to ask is how his tech savvy cousin (who also does taxidermy and accounting) makes it faster, larger, and redundant. In that case he makes 7 partitions and uses software to do a raid5 setup over the first 6 partitions, using the last one as parity. 428GB with a perfect, online safety net. Pretty smart, huh?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Two partitions by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good lord, somebody mod me Funny so all these /. numbnuts get that it was a joke.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Two partitions by Jeff+Hornby · · Score: 4, Funny

      But how can we mod you funny when, frankly, it wasn't.

      I think I might have a -1, troll sitting around here somehwere. Will that do?

      --
      Why doesn't Slashdot ever get slashdotted?
    3. Re:Two partitions by AddressException · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whooooooooooosh

      That's the sound of you missing the point.

    4. Re:Two partitions by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1, Funny

      In that case he makes 7 partitions and uses software to do a raid5 setup over the first 6 partitions, using the last one as parity. 428GB with a perfect, online safety net. Pretty smart, huh?

      Not really. first off it is all on the same drive so you won't be gaining any redundancy which is a critical part of RAID. second while there are schemes in place that can help position data on a single drive for more efficient access, making a pseudo RAID like this isn't going to help. In fact it will almost certainly make the drive perform at a worse level than if you used a single partition.

      What happens in a correctly set up RAID for speed like this is that to write some data to the disks (and I am simplifying here for the sake of education) the data is written simultaneously in pieces across all disks. This means instead of sending 10MB to one drive you'll send a little over 1MB simultaneously to 8 drives, which means you're no longer held back by waiting for the drive to complete writing which is typically the slowest link in the chain here.

      When doing it on multiple partitions on the one drive, you're actually extending the write time. the drive only has one head, so it'll be trying to write (or read) from one section on the drive while simultaneously being told to write/read from seven other sections on the drive at once. Even if it did those sequentially it would still be slower than a normal single drive, but it's more than likely the one drive head will flick across all 8 partitions randomly until it's retrieved the entire data. This couldn't be worse if you tried and will slow down the drive drastically. Not to mention probably wear out the drive more quickly and generate more heat.

      a RAID setup like you described is meant to make things faster and more secure. What you've done is set up a scheme that will make things slower and guarantee a shorter lifespan for your drive, which will then mean you lose everything.

      I suggest you go and read RAID at wikipedia to see how it works and why, and why your system won't be a benefit.

    5. Re:Two partitions by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't believe you actually wrote all of that. I can't believe that you wrote all of that, 20 minutes after I child-posted that it was a joke. I was so certain it was blatently ridulous, I decided to omit the smiley.

      Hey, you aren't my brother-in-law, are you? No, of course not...he'd probably still be thinking it was a good idea.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:Two partitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I suggest you go and read RAID at wikipedia to see how it works and why, and why your system won't be a benefit.

      I suggest you go and read humor at Merriam-webster and get a fucking clue.

  8. drive is finally more powerful than my brain by BrentRJones · · Score: 3, Funny

    This drive is finally more powerful than my brain which can store exactly 487 GB of information per lifetime. Wait, did I already post this message??

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  9. Re:Come onnn class action by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Funny
    Kibibyte, mebobyte, gubibyte, tebibyte, boobybyte... what could be so hard about that?
    That it sounds like Teletubbies making up units...
  10. Re:Size soon not being an issue by jcorno · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speak for yourself. Porn collections can be pretty demanding.

  11. Re:Just so you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally lost seven hard drives due to the poor manufacturing quality. Those hard drives contained data that was invaluable to me.

    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me seven times?

  12. Re:full article mirror & comment by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only thing Joe Sixpack backs up is his Ford.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  13. Re:full article mirror & comment by Nynaeve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also in the news:
    A new study finds that the size of one's pr0n collection is inversely proportional to the size of one's ... well, nevermind.

  14. cue the standard HD review flames by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    SCSI is better, all your (S|P)ATA users are losers.
    Who can back up all that data?
    Pr0n!
    s/Deskstar/Deathstar
    (Seagate|Maxtor|IBM|Hitachi|LaCie) is better!
    It runs too hot
    It runs too loud
    I have {insert obscure Linux kernel bug} when I install $DISTRO to this drive
    How many Libraries of Congress per hogshead is that?

    Seriously, does anything have anything TRULY insightful to say? (this post doesn't count, since its a meta-post)

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  15. Re:How could anyone ever use 500 GB?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With the sheer amount of free porn out there, why not simply get some fresh new stuff every time you need to masturbate?

  16. Re:full article mirror & comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    back when I was a tech for a small local computer store we had a guy come in desperate to get his businesses records back working on his laptop. Said he'd had everything in order set up by his son so it worked for him and he needed it back exactly how he had it, with his data intact.

    We checked out the drive in the Toshiba laptop he brought in and found not a thing on it bar a fresh default install of XP. Things didn't look good, and we ran what we could over it finding nothing. Guy comes back, we couldn't get his data so he starts threatening legal action cos his entire business depends on the data on that laptop. We explain it's been formatted, back to the state it was when it was brand new.

    turns out... it WAS brand new. Barely a week old when he brought it to us, the idiot had just up & SOLD his other laptop without any thought to backup & restore, then bought a new one the same model and expected to be able to use it just like the old one.

    Saw him again a few months later. he tried to get back in contact with the guy he'd sold it to, but it'd been stripped and parts sold off on eBay. Apparently he tried suing that guy too.

  17. only a month's worth of p0rn by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It only holds 500 hours of video. If I watched every minute from waking to sleeping, I use that up in a month :-(

  18. I didn't see the joke, so i'll post it... by MxTxL · · Score: 3, Funny

    So thats what they use in the 6.8GHz 1TB RAM and 2TB HDD Laptop!!

  19. Joe Sixpack says:" by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Funny
    "With that much space I can save all my data in a different folder and never have to back it up."

    Joe is still working on "Left click with your right hand!"

  20. Re:another review posted on slashdot earlier by RealityMogul · · Score: 2, Funny

    That previous article was only for a little 500GB, this is half a terabyte! duh! =P

  21. Half-terabyte my arse... by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've just finished work for a few days, and had a bottle of really good wine - and so I'm feeling good enough for a bit of wanton pedantry....

    Given the way hard drive manufacturers report capacity, I make it 465.7 GB, which is a whisker under 45.5% of a TB. Of course that's before any FS overhead.

    OK, it's *close* to half a TB, and it is a BIG hard drive (my first was 20 MB). BUT... if I had half a TB of data to store, I'd be short over 46 GB, which is no small amount.

  22. Re:Disk drive brand voodoo by tombeard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nonsense. All you had to do was open the system and, using the erasor end of a pencil, give the platter hub a push and hit the power switch. If you had 2 drives you would briefly power off after starting the first drive because the 2nd was cooking. Then before the first drive spun down you would push off the second drive. You shouldn't be spreading FUD about these fine drives.

    --
    The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
  23. Re:full article mirror & comment by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, the size of your pr0nz collection is directly proportional to the size of your pipe multiplied by its uptime.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"