Slashdot Mirror


A New Replacement for TV Tome

Randall311 writes to tell us about, what the creators hope will be, a new replacement for the old TV Tome website, the TV IV Wiki. The once popular TV Tome website was absorbed by CNET in April of this year and most of the content was added to their TV.com website. Many users dislike the new format with vast amounts of flash, obnoxious ads, and missing content. So, if you liked the old TV Tome website perhaps this will allow the community to rebuild what it has lost.

8 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Mirroring TV.com? by tabkey12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Probably not, as I'd be willing to bet that when you submitted that information you signed your copyright over to TVTome, agreed by you in the Terms & Conditions of the site. Sorry...

  2. Something Awful project by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Informative

    The TV IV stems from a forum on Something Awful so with all that goon power behind it I'm sure it will snowball shortly in to a quite concise database.

    The cookery forum offshoot, GBS Food is doing wonderfully since it's conception!

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  3. Re:Mirroring TV.com? Oops... by tabkey12 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Actually, looking at the terms, I may have made a mistake. TV.com is now part of the CNET network and so is governed by the CNET Networks Terms of Use.

    The Terms and Conditions states that you grant CNET Networks a licence to use your information any way they see fit, but the licence is nonexclusive. Therefore, the users who contributed the information at TVTome (or TV.com) could add that information to the TVIV Wiki too. However, proving who was the copyright holder of a paragraph, which was originally written by one person, then modified by, say three others, would probably make this too complicated to work on a large scale.

  4. Re:Poor resource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    if you like 30 versions of Briteny Speers "oops i did it agian", then FreeDB is viable option. Aside from the quality of the information, though, the information they do have is inadequate (ie, year, genre, etc. is only stored for the CD as a whole, not individual tracks, which may not be the same.)

  5. epguides.com by Morinaka · · Score: 5, Informative

    If your just looking for episode listings and the episode names, http://www.epguides.com/ is pretty good. No flash ads or anything. It also links straight to the TV.com page when you click on the episode link. So that option is still available.

    --
    Rock is Dead! Long live Paper and Scissors!!
  6. Re:Wiki mostly US-based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Doctor Who did take a 16-year break though.

  7. Re:Why the stupid name? by CygnusTM · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a forum called "The TV IV" on the Something Awful forums. (It's "IV" as in "intravenous", i.e. getting our TV "fix".) This is where the idea to create this was born. We initially were thinking of a site to store info on the shows we like, but then we decided that if we invited others, we might be able to build something really good.

  8. Multi-show sites like TV.com can never compete... by Tycoon+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... with show-specific fan sites. Why would you bother going to TV.com, where at most you'll find a one-paragraph description of episodes that you've already seen, when a show-specific site can offer so much more information?

    If I want to know about Desperate Housewives, I'll go to Get Desperate. For Lost, I visit Lost Media; for Family Guy, the Family Guy Files, and for CSI, CSI Files. I even still visit Crashdown, a Roswell fan site, even though that show was cancelled YEARS ago. Most of these sites are updated several times a day -- TV.com can never compete against that.

    What I would really like would be an index to the best show-specific fan sites on the internet, for every single show that's out there. TV.com should just switch to that!