Rickford Grant Interview

An anonymous reader writes "An interview was recently conducted with Rickford Grant, the author of "Linux for Non-Geeks" and the new "Linux Made Easy". Grant is outspoken in his opinions and offers a number of unique views on topics as diverse as Windows Vista, desktop Linux, GNOME vs. KDE, and lots more. Part of the interview is spent talking about his new book but the bulk of the interview is a discussion of his views on pertinent topics and news. The author is a strong supporter of desktop Linux and has been getting quite a bit of attention for his views on the subject."

Comments

Yin and Yang

[ackthpt]

As for whether or not there is a place for Windows in the computing world... well, I would definitely say yes. I don't like Windows, and, from what I've heard and read, I don't particularly like Mr. Bill [Gates], but you have to give credit where credit is due. If it weren't for the Gates gang, I really doubt the personal computer world would be where it is today.

This is also is a strong reason why Linux, MacOS, etc, get better. Without Microsoft's machinations there wouldn't be much motivation for innovation. Imagine a world where the PC actually died out due to the superior interface and usability of the Mac, yet the Mac remained expensive and advanced slowly, painstakingly.

[On the arrive of Vista/IE7]Also, the fact that Vista will reportedly only work on machines with accelerated graphics might also cause some folks lacking in that department to take a second look at the Linux option.

Or in our case stagnate at XP for years to come.

The author is a strong supporter of desktop Linux and has been getting quite a bit of attention for his views on the subject." "Steve, hire him and put him in the office next to ESR."

Re:Yin and Yang

[Bogtha]

If it weren't for the Gates gang, I really doubt the personal computer world would be where it is today.

So true. It would be much further along.

If Microsoft hadn't crushed DR-DOS, perhaps Digital Research would have come out with something better than Windows. If Microsoft hadn't crushed Netscape, perhaps Netscape's vision of network applications in the vein of XUL would have come along years earlier. If Microsoft hadn't included illegally copied software in DOS from Stac Electronics, perhaps Apple would have been able to compete more effectively and brought us a stable operating system years before Microsoft managed to do it. If Microsoft hadn't conned their way into a cheap deal for Mosaic, perhaps Internet Explorer wouldn't have the death grip it has on the market, and perhaps web developers would be able to use CSS, PNG, HTML, HTTP, etc without being held back by Internet Explorer's flaws.

Without Microsoft's machinations there wouldn't be much motivation for innovation.

Without Microsoft's machinations, there would be much more possibility for innovation. It's pretty hard to innovate when the biggest software company in the world is willing to break the law and use all of its resources to crush competition.

The number of things Microsoft have done to destroy and hold back competition is mind-boggling. I have no problems believing that if another company, run by people who weren't quite so willing to break the law, had been in the same position as Microsoft, the computer industry would be much further along.

Re:Yin and Yang

[Bogtha]

What in the hell does stealing a drive compression routine for DOS, a 16-bit, non-protected, single threaded operating system have to do with Apple delivering us a stable operating system?

Did the drive compression add value to Microsoft's operating system? Could the added value conceivably have cost Apple sales? If Apple had a better position in the market with more money, could they have done better?

My point was that Microsoft broke the law numerous times in order to gain an unfair advantage over companies that could have outperformed them if Microsoft hadn't have broken the law.

standards don't mean shit. They really don't. No for profit entity has ever strived for interoperability unless it was in their absolute best interest.

Before Internet Explorer came on the scene, there was at least a little healthy competition in the browser market. With no browser having 90%+ market share, interoperability was in everybody's best interests.

He who has the money and the marketshare makes the standards. Period. It's that way in every facet of capitalism, whether it be computers or prosthetic limbs.

Rich people and rich organisations are not above the law and should still be held accountable for their actions.

Some of the things in our society make Gates & Co. seem like angels.

Completely irrelevent. Transgressions of unrelated organisations do not have the slightest bearing on whether or not Microsoft held back the computer industry.

Technical Subjects

[Brainix]

My dad doesn't know as much about computers as I do. Whenever he asks a technical question, he reminds me, "Simplify, but don't over-simplify."

From this interview, it looks like Rickford Grant knows what he's talking about, but crosses the line into over-simplification.

I don't think I'll recommend this book.

Re:Technical Subjects

[mblase]

Whenever he asks a technical question, he reminds me, "Simplify, but don't over-simplify."

I think he's paraphrasing Einstein: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."

Nice interview

[MaestroSartori]

It's always interesting to hear other people's opinions. One bit I felt a need to comment on was the following:

Interviewer: Why is every Windows user not on Linux?

Grant: Some don't care, others don't know, others are afraid to try.

Some of us do care, know all too well, and haven't been afraid to try - but our apps just aren't on Linux. In my case, one remarkably lovely music app keeps me using Windows. I also have no idea if Linux supports my Terratec sound card, but it probably does. Last time I used Linux audio was problematic to say the least, but that was around Mandrake 9 and with a Soundblaster, so it may well have changed for the better.

It's all about the apps, sometimes people seem forget that. If all the apps that a given person needs are available, and are easy enough to use, they'll probably be entirely happy on whatever OS they end up with. For someone with a specific itch to scratch, that isn't always the case...

Re:Nice interview

[kfg]

One of the issues here is not to ask "does it run my app?," but rather to ask "does it do this?"

Often the answer is, "Yes. Yes it does; and here's how."

Since Linux is structured as a workplace for engineers, rather than as a platform for application sales, it uses the "tool" metaphor, rather than the "app" metaphor. It doesn't have a machine that cranks out chairs at the touch of a button. It's got table saws and drill presses and screw drivers, but. . .

it's also got the means to automate the tools to be a machine that cranks out chairs at the touch of a button.

It doesn't have a machine to crank out chairs, it's a machine to crank out machines.

But here's the kicker; we share the machines.

And the tools, which, since they are independant of the "app" are independantly upgradable. You only have one spell checking tool on your system which all of your "apps" share. Only one dictionary to maintain, only one set of commands to learn, and if a better one comes along you just swap it out and every "app" instantly has a better spell checker. Just like buying a better table saw instead of buying a new chair making machine to make squarer cuts, although perhaps drill poorer holes.

But if you ask if a particular "app" has spell checking, from the Windows user point of view the answer will be "no."

The problem is that from a Windows user point of view they don't look like what you expect an "app" to look like, although they perform the same function.

Think function, not app.

But sometimes, you're right, the answer is also,"No, Linux does not perform that function yet, because the function is a Windows app."

Just not as often as most people think.

KFG

Re:Over-under...

[temojen]

Whose desktop?

Linux vs Windows

[Daveznet]

It sounds like he knows what hes talking about, even though he is not a fan of Microsoft he knows when to give credit when its due. Microsoft did help revolutionize the Computer Industry as we know it today whether it was for the good or bad. What I belive is that use an operating system that meets your needs, if you are gonna be playing alot of games and watching movies and surfing the web then sure go with windows , if you are going to be doing some hardcore development where you need access to alot of open source applications and need more control of your system then Linux is the way to go. Its all about going with what suits your needs.

by whos book?

[myspys]

"topics as diverse as Windows Vista, desktop Linux, GNOME vs. KDE"

i can think of things that are WAY more diverse

Why?

[mblase]

Why is every Windows user not on Linux?

• Because of the pervasive (mis?)conception that Linux requires a lot of geeky tweaking to get it to work.
• Because Linux on the desktop has been chasing Windows for years, feature-wise, and has yet to get ahead.
• Because they like to play games they can buy at Wal-Mart.
• Because they have to use Microsoft Office to be fully compatible with the .doc files they get from work.
• Because they haven't heard of it.
• Because Windows is already bundled on the PC they bought at Best Buy.
• Because they're used to Windows.
• Because they don't know the difference between GNOME and KDE, and honestly don't care.

Or something like that.

"If I had never used a computer before..."

[Anonymous Coward]

A friend of mine bought his first PC just a few months ago. Guess who supports it? He had it a week before I had to reload XP, as viruses and spyware had it completely unuseable.

I reloaded XP from the Ghost disks, installed Zone Alarm, Firefox, and a couple of anti-spyware apps, removed the IE icons (I wish I could remove IE itself), and gave him a few pointers on safe computing.

It lasted three weeks before it needed Ghosting again. Seems he let his girlfriend's click-happy kid loose on it.

This time after installing the ghost image and safety apps, I also installed Mandrake, set up so it logged into a default user by itself on boot. No logging into "the computer," no running a proprietary DSL app to get on the internet; just turn on the computer and it works.

Three weeks later it was hosed again - seems he "needed" Yahoo! IM, which was a Windows app. I couldn't get the Linux version working. Damn.

Finally I remembered getting my daughter on AIM with Gaim - and lo and behold, it works on Yahoo, too.

What sold him on Linux? "You can click on anything," I told him. I mean, between him, his porn-happy nephew and girl friend's kid, somebody was going to click on "anything" anyway.

The next week the KDE desktop was littered with downloaded Flash installs, which the kid couldn't install. Heh, even if she'd got the Linux versions rather than the Windows version it still wouldn't install, as I'm the only one who knows the root password.

It's been a few weeks since I've had to reinstall anything.

The moral of the story? New users should not be trusted with Windows, or with a Linux root password. And unless you're into games (and new users aren't) there is really no valid need for Windows at home.

Who Rickford?

[mooingyak]

It nice that Rickford grant interview, but who Rickford?