Slashdot Mirror


A Look at Photonic Clocking

zymano writes "In an article on the Electronic Engineering Times site James Siepmann shares a few thoughts about Photonic Clocking. Siepmann states: 'Copper interconnects are reaching their limit as data-transmission bandwidth and processor speed continue to rise. [..] Photonic clocking not only solves the limitations of electronic clocking, but also reduces jitter, skew, delay, crosstalk and power consumption while maintaining clock signal integrity for longer distances.'" Are Photonic Processors the next logical step, or will the almighty buck shuffle them aside because of cost?

3 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are Photonic Processors the next logical step, or will the almighty buck shuffle them aside because of cost?

    Yeah, 'cause technology never gets cheaper. Hey, I've got an AT&T 8086 PC with a lovely green monitor that you can have for $5000, if you act now...

  2. Article light on details by Steve525 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article didn't say a whole lot, did it? It just said, "Gee, wouldn't photonic clocking be nice". It didn't say a whole lot about how, and whether it's feasible.

    So, I'll quickly fill in what I know. To do clock distribution you need two types of components: waveguides and detectors. Let's assume you are going to work in silicon...

    Waveguides function as the optical wiring, and includes things like bends and splitters. Although perhaps not trivial, it is relative straight-forward to make waveguides in or on silicon. Detectors, on the other hand, are not so easy, at least at the wavelength most people are interested in, 1550 nm. There's a number of people researching Ge growth for detectors on Si, and this does have promise, but it's not ready yet. Another option would be bonding InGaAs, but that might always be too expensive.

    Now, if you want to do full up optical communication, on chip, you'll want modulators, too. These have been demonstrated by Intel and Cornell in silicon, but only at speeds around 1 Ghz. Optical amplifiers would be nice, too, and this has been demonstrated (using Raman amplification) by Intel and UCLA. (I'm not sure Raman amplification can give you the sorts of amplification and efficiency you really need, though).

    (Sorry, I won't be able to respond to any replies; at least not until Monday. I'm off to bed and I'm not planning to be near a computer tomorrow).

  3. It's all just waveguides by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Distributing your clock with photons imples you have a photon wave guide. If you are going to build a photon wave guide then why not build an electrical wave guide. Electrical wave guides, like for example coax cable, have wave velocities that are faster than light in glass, so they would logically be even better. And you dont' need any special materials like you would for optical wave guides.

    The problem might be that usually wave guides have to be the size of the wavelength to work right. ghz wavelength are larger than the chip. Thus you get forced towards the optical region by this considerarion.

    But you can beat this two ways.

    1) use negative index of refraction materials. Then the waveguide can be smaller than the wave length

    2) use near field waveguides with amplification. When the wavelength is a lot larger than the waveguide then the wave becomes evanscent (decaying). So it can't propagate very far. But hey, that's okay because the chip is not very wide either, so we can tolerate some loss of signal. And we could toss in some amplification to offset it.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.