Slashdot Mirror


Peerflix Launches P2P DVD Sharing Service

Dotnaught writes "Peerflix has offically launched, ending a 12 month beta test. The company manages the peer-to-peer trading of physical DVDs (with CDs and videogames coming soon) by mail. As the article in InformationWeek suggests, while such trades may be legal under the first-sale doctrine of U.S. Copyright Act, content owners won't be pleased -- discs are easy to copy and there's ample precedent to suggest users will dupe discs before trading them."

31 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. as opposed to the NetFlix project? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful

    rent it all, copy and send back? is this less/more offensive than netflix= just because there is no monthly fee?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:as opposed to the NetFlix project? by ghstomahawks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      exactly ... but it happens anyway. The real genius is a company finding a way to make money off of illegal scheming of peoples. Rock on!

    2. Re:as opposed to the NetFlix project? by dasunt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is more offensive because it encourages you to use your rights under the first-sale doctrine.

      It also pisses them off because no money flows to them. Netflix and every video store also annoys them, but its (mostly) too late to stop that, at least in the short term.

      They won't be happy until they get a fee everytime a person views their movie.

      Greedy bastards, aren't they?

  2. Asks about piracy by sdaug · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using Peerflix through the beta test. Every time I receive a disc, it asks me if it appears to be pirated. I assume they would then take action against the sender if this is the case, but I don't know for sure.

    1. Re:Asks about piracy by modemboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How would you tell if someone pirated it?
      I believe the submitter is suggesting that the end user would make a copy, keep the copy, then send on the original, not the copy...

    2. Re:Asks about piracy by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem isn't sending pirated discs, but pirating the disc for personal use and then sending the original back.

      Me, I've attempted to use way too many pirated discs (it wasn't mine, it was given to me by friend(s) and I didn't realise until I started watching it). The quality has been so shit that I've given up. Sure there's ways to pirate stuff while keeping the quality, but I've been burned so many times (friend rents a DVD and burns it) that I've given up with all of it and now refuse to watch any pirated movies. If it's good enough to watch, it's good enough for me to spend some money on it.

    3. Re:Asks about piracy by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      How would you tell if someone pirated it?

      I usually see a little box drawn on the disc with a sharpie. Next to the box, the word "copied" is written. If there is a check in the little box, well, you know it's been pirated.

    4. Re:Asks about piracy by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, you're forgetting pirated in Hong Kong / China pirated. The far more popular kind of pirated. I've seen plenty of pirated hardware for consoles, and the same holds true for DVDs. The worksmanship is far superiour to your average burnt in a DVD-r quality, but still not a decent release. Pirated carts are typically much easier to spot, since they usually don't work right and the labels look like trash. This is the sort of piracy that netflix can prevent by purchasing in bulk from reputable distributers, that peerflix can't quite filter for.

      But the submitter probably was suggesting the usual rent-burn-return piracy. It's just not the only form out there is all.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    5. Re:Asks about piracy by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      How would you tell if someone pirated it?

      Scratch marks. The pirate will leave scratch marks when they put the disk in its packaging 'cos they have a hook hand.

      Plus, the notes on the back of the box differ in telltale ways from the usual fare, for example they might say stuff like "Ahar me mateys, this be a fine film, 'two hooks up' raves the critics! The whole crew will rejoice at this swashbuckler of a picture, plus an extra DVD with a treasure chest of bonus scenes! Rated ARRRRRR!"

  3. Fighting The Waves by JordanL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How would any media corporation of any kind fight something like this on any principal but that they think all their users are lying, cheating bastards?

    And even then... would companied like Paramount have to sue themselves for owning something like Blockbuster?

  4. RTFA by magicchex · · Score: 3, Informative
    "A 99-cent transaction fee is charged for each DVD acquired, and there's a $4.95 signup fee that includes five free trades. To each trade, add the cost of 37 cents for postage; there's also the cost of ink and a piece of paper that will become the self-printed disc mailer."
    --
    How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  5. Lying, cheating bastards by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They already think everyone who uses their product is a lying cheating bastard who deserves their scorn.

    Reference:
    - the "do not pirate" commericals in a theatre, after you've paid to see the movie
    - The FBI warning at the beginning of every DVD that you can't fast-forward through
    - Unskippable advertisements on DVDs, especially rentals

    1. Re:Lying, cheating bastards by Eq+7-2521 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In my experience this does usually work, but it does depend on both the player and how stringently the DVD was authored. I have had some DVDs that are extremely locked down where I cannot skip past certain things no matter what buttons I push (on my Panasonic DVD-R30). Even when one of the buttons does work (menu, next chapter, FF (4 times to get it to 16x and then still some waiting), title), it's still irritating to have to have tried all those combinations just to skip some stupid screen or advertisement. Thankfully, many cheap DVD players (like the jWin something or other I have upstairs) generally ignore the Prohibited User Options on the disc.

      --
      At my age I find coming up with a witty signature too exhausting.
  6. Why use this instead of Netflix? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And why would I even consider using this instead of Netflix? With Netflix, I have every DVD I could imagine one day away, and if there's something wrong with it, they'll send me a replacement. With this setup, I'm getting DVD's in who-knows-what condition, in who-knows-how-much time from who-knows-who. Oh yeah, and I'm still paying, possibly more than Netflix. Where do I sign up?

    1. Re:Why use this instead of Netflix? by dasunt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Different strokes for different folks.

      Assume that you get 3 movies out each week from Netflix for $17.99. That's $215.88/year, and with 52.18 weeks in the year, that's 156.54 movies a year, for the cost of $1.38/movie.

      Peerflix costs about the same ($.99 + $.37 = $1.36/movie).

      So what is better? If I wanted to rent movies, I'd use Netflix. If I wanted to own movies by trading out movies I don't like in my collection, I'd use Peerflix.

      Disclaimer: Happy Netflix customer. ;) I prefer to rent, not own.

  7. Yeah, right by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Like I'm really want to keep a copy of the new Planet of the Apes movie or the new Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy... Studios only wish I wanted those so badly.

    Maybe thet's it, people will realize what turkys they are when Peerflix gets flooded with those loosers.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  8. Re:Conversion Rate? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Like they already do with NetFlix?

    I seen a lot of copies of "Napoleon Dynamite" and "Fight Club" with Sharpie labels on people's shelves at home...

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  9. This is GREAT! by GecKo213 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like the whole idea. In fact, my friends and I have been doing this for years now. We never buy the same game (unless it's needed to play networked games) and just pass it around between each other when we're finished. Always have new games to play and typically at about 1/4 the cost.

    Now it has happened and will continue to happen that we all like the game so much that we end up buying our individual copies of the game anyway. I really like this idea though!

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  10. Why'd this take so long? by Asprin · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I used to do this with my friends in college - I bought Eye of the Beholder, he bought Ultima Underworld. When we finished them, we'd trade boxes.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  11. I don't see the advantage by Matt2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're just going to trade casually, this service might work okay. Hopefully your sender will mail the disc on time and isn't away on vacation. Does anyone know how long it usually takes to get a request?

    On the other hand, if you're someone who really wants to watch a lot of movies, wants to count on being able to get new releases relatively soon, I don't know if this would work out so hot. With Netflix for $18/mo if you really push it, you can get maybe 9-12 DVDs a month. Of course if you sit on your discs, you might only get five or six a month. But they at least ship stuff on a schedule, not whenever they feel like hunting down a DVD and walking it out to the mailbox. I guess I'm just pretty cynical, and relying upon other Joes to send me their movies in a reasonalble timeframe with reasonable quality.

    Do I get this right.. You print out the mailer from your printer?

    And movies are assigned "peerbux" ratings, so you can't offer up a bunch of Clint Eastwood movies from the 70s and expect to get the complete Sopranos in return? How does that work? You need to build up a library of good movies so you can give them away? I'm not understanding.

    *shrug*

    I just don't see it as being worth the hassle, but good for you if you like it.

  12. Ripping traded discs by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People already rip rental DVD's. I can't imagine the problem getting much worse with traded DVD's.

  13. What is this easy DVD copying method that they by multiplexo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    refer to in the article. It sounds like FUD to me, DVDs are nowhere near as easy to copy as CDs, especially if it's a dual layer DVD.

    It would be nice if these media retards understood that the reasons why MP3s took off in the late 1990s was that hard drive capacities increased dramatically in a short period of time relative to the capacity of CD-ROMs, because CD-RW drives became real cheap all of a sudden and because the people who liked making mix tapes really liked a format that was a lot easier to deal with that allowed you to make mix CDs with hundreds of songs just by pointing and clicking. None of these things apply with DVDs, the biggest hard drive you can get today will only hold 100 uncompressed DVD images (I'm assuming that we don't want further compression because it degrades the image which looks like shit on a big screen TV), people don't make video mix tapes (although it would be kind of interesting) and also because it's still a pain in the ass to strip CSS off of DVDs. Jesus Christ, could these lazy media bastards just put down the grape-flavored MPAA piracy Kool-Aid for once?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  14. Amazing, Isn't It? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The "average user" can't (according to the Windows shills) figure out how to run Linux - but they can figure out how to duplicate a DVD and then share it over a P2P network (according to said "average users" writing for the RIAA and MPAA).

    What's wrong with this picture?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. they already have this service for free by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they are called 'Libraries'

    check one out some time.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. The Situation in a Nutshell by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only right movie producers have is to exclusively show first viewings in movie theaters. That's the only right they've ever had for the last 100 years since films were first made.

    The fact that digitization is making it easier and easier to distribute this media after the showing in theatres is completely beyond the moral scope of these companies.

    They quite simply found a lot of free cash in the 80s with cable TV distribution and VHS rentals. That free cash was never theirs by right in the first place, and they offered a viable distribution service back then...those times are over, and the right to reap all those free profits is being taken back by the real bosses in a free market, the customer.

    Eat shit and die MPAA/RIAA

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  18. My own Peerflix experience... by Rageon · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been using Peerflix for a couple months and have been relatively satisfied with it. It's proven to be a good way to get rid of all those old DVDs that would have either gathered dust for years or fetched me 3 bucks at a pawn shop. I've gotten plenty of movies as gifts or free throw-ins with things that I never wanted in the first place, or others that I bought but later realized I never watched. Frankly, the $1 it costs to upgrade a crappy movie to something else is well worth it.

    I've only had 1 problem so far. I got a copy of Night of the Living Dead that was scrathed to hell. When it arrived, it played, so I confirmed it. Of course, when I played it, I found that a couple minutes would not play. But because I had let a week or so pass between receipt and claim, I was out of luck. I wrote about 5 emails to their CS about this, and got 1 response, which really had nothing to do with my complaint. But otherwise nearly all the movies I've gotten are in very good condition.

    The bad part is that a lot of movies are technically "available", but might only be in the hands of 1 or 2 other users, neither of which actually intends to share their copy, but has it listed for one reason or another. So it sometimes takes a few weeks (or more) to get some movies. Also, maybe half the movies I listed have been requested by others. But then again, I didn't expect the demand to be extremely high for that copy of The Mask someone gave me. Generally, good movies get requested fairly quickly.

    If you have a specific movie in mind that you want right away, Peerflix isn't the best solution. But if you have a list of 20 or so movies you would like to get eventually, it's a nice service.

    My only other complaint would be that when your "Peerbux" goes to zero, it automatically charges another $5 worth to you, rather than waiting until you actually want to buy something. This is obviously a nice way for the company to get a few bucks extra from everyone in the end, but it strikes me as shadey.

    As far a Piracy goes, well, it's really no different than renting movies or using Netflix, so I think it's a non-issue as it pertains to Peerflix specifically.

    1. Re:My own Peerflix experience... by Wanker · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've only had 1 problem so far. I got a copy of Night of the Living Dead that was scrathed to hell.

      You're in luck! This movie is in the Public Domain due to a forgotten copyright renewal back in The Good Old Days when they were still required.

      Download and burn a copy. It's legal. Check around.

      http://www.archive.org/details/night_of_the_living _dead
  19. Re:bah... we already have a trading medium by great+throwdini · · Score: 4, Informative

    you get the full purchase price minus a $1 service fee and the Amazon seller fee.

    Uh, you get the sale price less the Amazon seller fee and a $1 service charge. It's not based off the original purchase price, as resold DVDs typically don't sell for anywhere near original cost to you. And who gets the extra amount Amazon reimburses for shipping (which is treated separately from its fees)?

    Whomever is behind replaylink.com is basically printing out the mailer and charging you for that nicety. Why not sell it yourself and not pay the fee? It's pretty easy to list items for sale on Amazon, with no need to share information with another third-party.

    It also seems a bit shady vis-a-vis Amazon's resale policy, what with a seller listing items for trade that aren't in its direct possession ... neat idea, but it basically introduces a second middle-man (in addition to Amazon) to the transaction between true buyer and true seller.

  20. First Sale by Arandir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...while such trades may be legal under the first-sale doctrine of U.S. Copyright Act...

    That's just because it isn't software. On more than one occasion I have been told by software companies that selling your used copy was illegal, even if the sale included all packing material and an affidavit that you wiped your harddrive of the product. They argue that the First Sale Doctrine does not apply to them because the software was never sold, only licensed. They have shut down eBay sales of software and sent cease and desist notices to yard sales.

    All the DVD manufacturers need to do to stop Peerflix, is to slap a license on every DVD. It won't be legal, but that hasn't stopped the software industry or its lapdogs in the judiciary.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  21. Re:First Sale by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Informative
    They argue that the First Sale Doctrine does not apply to them because the software was never sold, only licensed.

    District courts in California and Texas have disagreed
    Specifically, the ruling decreed that software purchases be treated as sales transactions, rather than explicit license agreements. In other words, the court ruling argued that Californian consumers should have the same rights they would enjoy under existing copyright legislation when buying a CD or a book.

    If you're in Missouri, though.. watch out.
    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.