Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Korean Mozilla Binaries Infected

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the caught-with-their-pants-down dept.

Magnus writes "Korean distributions of Mozilla and Thunderbird for Linux were infected with Virus.Linux.RST.b. This virus searches for executable ELF files in the current and /bin directories and infects them. It also contains a backdoor, which downloads scripts from another site, and executes them, using a standard shell."

13 of 592 comments (clear)

  1. So let me get this straight... by SpocksLoveChild · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's a virus?... for linux? I'm sorry but just don't understand the situation?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No worries. That is common for most slashdot readers.

  2. 6 stories down on the front page by ifwm · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mozilla hits back at browser security claim"

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

  3. Ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    So much for OSS security. Show me one instance of this happening to Microsoft...

    Oh, wait.

  4. Korean Mozilla Binaries Infected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Birdflu ?

  5. Poor Koreans... Again... by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Funny

    First the unofficial Korean Mozilla site in July, and now long obsolete versions of the Korean Mozilla (not Firefox) and Korean Thunderbird builds. I doubt anyone was infected, nor was that likely the intent, especially given the old, neither stable nor current, version numbers, but one thing is clear. Someone out there really doesn't like Koreans.

  6. North Korea? by killtherat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you think we can blame this on the North Korean Hacker army we've been hearing about?

  7. Added by the Magnificent Kim himself? by twain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the perp behind was the magnificent and dear chairman Kim Jong-Il himself? I really can't think of anyone else clever enough with skills mad skillz to pull it off.

  8. Re:No, no, no... Windows is as secure. by arkanes · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, Windows is more secure because you can't write to a binary thats being executed or has been loaded by another process. Viruses can only infect your system files if you reboot!

  9. See, Windows is more secure by doublem · · Score: 4, Funny

    See! Windows and IE ARE more secure!!!

    MWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

    The larger number of exploits in Firefox is just the tip of the ice berg!

    Open Source, you are going DOWN!

    And I for one, welcome our new DRM laden overlords.

    Oh, wait, they're not NEW overlords, they've been the overlords for a few decades now.

    Well, I welcome them anyway.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  10. It's about freaking time... by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's about freaking time virus writers started supporting Linux and Mozilla...

    Err, wait...

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  11. Re:Mozilla.co.kr by rxmd · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Mozilla foundation needs to pursue strong, immediate public action against NKing.com, holders of the mozilla.co.kr domain. Using the Mozilla name connotes official status, and they are trashing it badly.
    I suggest that the Mozilla foundation registers mozilla.co.kp instead and continues to release official binaries only there. I knew these two Koreas had to be good for something ;)
    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  12. Re:Secure.. by runderwo · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why you keep your home directory on a RAID, duh! :)

    --
    LRC, the best-read libertarian site on the web