Slashdot Mirror


Peter Jackson Won't Direct Halo

The ever excellent Rumor Control column on Gamespot deals with a couple of good ones this week. The bubble I wish they hadn't popped concerns the upcoming Halo movie adaptation. While IMDB listed Uwe Boll as the director earlier this week, the internets began circulating with the rumor that LOTR Director Peter Jackson might be taking the helm. From the article: "The green valleys and lush terrain of New Zealand, where Jackson filmed Rings, would make a nice stand-in for Halo's surface landscape. Lastly, there's the matter of the country's favorable exchange rate, which made shooting Rings much less expensive than it would have been if it had been made in the States--and the same could be done for Halo ... In this case, it was seen by someone with a sick sense of humor, because, according to a rep from Universal, the Peter Jackson rumor is 'completely untrue.'"

39 comments

  1. He would probably refuse in the first place. by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

    Considering the quality of Mortal Kombat and Resident Evil, and the expectations for Doom, I don't think he would want to spoil his career with a videogame->movie adaptation.

    1. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by Jarlsberg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think it'd be interesting to see Jackson helm the Halo movie project, but personally, I'm waiting for him to film the Hobbit. I hope he's still going to go ahead with that :).

      Uwe Boll must be cheap to hire. What else could explain Microsofts decision (if it was theirs to make) to use him for Halo. Maybe it was just poor editing on IMDB's case.

    2. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen his "Meet the Feebles"?

      His career is already spoiled, LOTR was him digging back out.

    3. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Meet the feebles was pretty funny and absolutely disgusting at the same time. Brilliant! :)

    4. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgeting Super Mario Brothers! Who wouldn't want to be known as the director of SMB: The Movie?

    5. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by Repton · · Score: 1

      When PJ made _Heavenly Creatures_, he received critical acclaim.

      He said that, in a way, he was annoyed about that --- it meant that he couldn't just make any old movie any more, because suddenly there was all this pressure on him to do something with artistic merit and stuff.

      So, I don't think he's too concerned about his career...

      (well, those millions from LotR will also help)

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    6. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by erroneous · · Score: 1

      Maybe they've seen the early rushes for Dungeon Siege and it's brilliant!!!!!

      Well, it might be.

      It's got Burt Reynolds in it, how bad can it be?

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    7. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by thebdj · · Score: 1

      Don't forget: Mario Brothers, Street Fighter, Double Dragon, the considerably worse Mortal Kombat sequel, and god knows how many others I missed.

      Also remember, that Mortal Kombat was probably the best of the fighting games (that I remember) to be made into a movie. I mean it did have Christopher Lambert in it!

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    8. Re:He would probably refuse in the first place. by some+guy+on+slashdot · · Score: 1

      Dungeons and Dragons, the movie. If you're thinking you might want to give this gem a rent, I submit this particularly fetid bit of dialogue as a deterrent.

      Wizard Chick: I can do it! I'm a mage!

      Fighter Guy: Yeah, a low level mage.

      Suspension of Disbelief, meet my friend Sledgehammer. I know you two will get along.

  2. Peter Jackson by Meagermanx · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? Someone directed an excellent, geeky series? They should make all geeky series, no matter the genre or subject matter of the film!

    1. Re:Peter Jackson by kinglink · · Score: 1

      Well duh, one of the studio's who made LOTR's Special Effects is involved in Evangelion, so of course Jackson can't be allowed to elave, and now we must punish him for King Kong!

      And when is the Wackoski brothers going to start making Quake the Movie?

    2. Re:Peter Jackson by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Give Halo the status of "geeky". Don't taint "geek" with this filth... ;) (Long Live Goldeneye*!)

      * EA does not make Bond games. I don't care what anyone says...

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  3. exchange rate? by andy_fish · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Weird comment about Australia's exchange rate. What does that have to do with Peter Jackson? Can't Uwe Boll just as easily go to Australia to film the movie? Unless he isn't welcome there..

    --
    & I wish I knew the password to your heart . . . &
    1. Re:exchange rate? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 4, Funny

      New Zealand may be Australia's equivalent to our Canada, but they were seperate countries last I checked. Had flags and everything.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    2. Re:exchange rate? by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 1

      Actually, he isn't welcome there. In fact, he's been banished to Pluto for the crimes against humanity that were his last two "films".

    3. Re:exchange rate? by spudgun · · Score: 1

      maps.google.com scroll down and left over the pacific ocean

      Look New Zealand and Australia are seperated by the tasman sea !

      Canada and the USA only have an imaginary line !

      SEPERATE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      not same !

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    4. Re:exchange rate? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Although they are fairly similar to each other, and there was a suggestion in 1901 for NZ to join the commonwealth, and more recently for a currency union. Oh, and it's "separate" :-)

  4. One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marathon.

    It will be made some day.

    The problem with Halo isn't that it is a bad story, it's that it just dreadfully boring. I guess there are a lot of people who still salivate over anything with that shiny metal effect on things in games. Quaint I guess.

    There was a time long ago when Bungie didn't suck. It's not clear if it was the sell out to Microsoft did the damage or if it was something else internally. Halo 2 is the first game that was pretty much completely developed after the buyout and it should be a pretty go indication of downward spiral the company is on.

  5. Ewww, Boll? by Alterscape · · Score: 1

    While I can't say I'm a huge fan of the Halo franchise -- I've played the first game on a friend's xbox, and enjoyed the PC demo's multiplayer for about half an hour when it came out -- I understand that the novelizations aren't half bad, and I'd hate to see Uwe Boll do the Halo universe the same damage he's done to other titles I'm attached to. I refuse to watch the Alone in the Dark movie because, from what I've heard, what he did to the story isn't worth my time, nevermind my money. Under no circumstances would a movie based on Halo ever be great cinema. But the fans deserve more than a Boll treatment. I'm not sure if Jackson is the man with the job, but there have to be plenty of decent directors who wouldn't mind taking on what's likely to be a reasonably succesful film for its genre, if its done right.

    1. Re:Ewww, Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Bungie, the rumors stating that Boll will direct are "absolutely not true."

      http://halo.bungie.org/news.html?item=14056/

    2. Re:Ewww, Boll? by a1r · · Score: 1

      Please note that IMDB no longer associates Uwe Boll with Halo. This is excellent news. If you don't believe me check the appalling aggregate scoring of his last film Alone In The Dark, provided by metacritic.

      Far Cry fans will be disappointed however, he's scheduled to ruin that franchise next...

      --
      ... Two large gins, two pints of cider. Ice in the cider.
  6. Why did this news merit posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Williams Shakespeare foolishly turns down chance to write screenplay for new "Friends" movie!

    Sir Anthony Hopkins opts out of "Dukes of Hazzard II"!

    Dame Judy Dench turns down opportunity to appear in abysmal sequel to "Pitch Black"...oh, wait...

  7. What's so great about Peter Jackson by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is an honest request for an answer.

    My mom is a big fan of the books so every Christmas day for three years in a row, one of my gifts to her was to bring her to a theatre to watch the film. She seemed to enjoy them.

    I, however, missed the point. It was a straight up adventure film - and a very pretty one - but had no depth to it. I only read the Hobbit so I don't know the details of what the story was suppose to be. But what the movie featured, ultimatly, very ugly people in a war with very pretty people, and the very pretty people won and established a dictatorship.

    Did I miss something?

    1. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by 23_Elders · · Score: 1

      The movies left out a bunch of information from the books. However if you are just looking at the story told in the movies, you would be correct. Most people don't seem to care too much what got left behind. For me, I can't really stand those movies not just because they are edited but because of what was changed, and how they changed things. In many respects the movie tells a very different, more shallow story.

    2. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not trolling or flame bait:

      No, you didn't miss anything. Tolkien is highly overrated.

    3. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      That depends, did you watch the regular releases or the special editions? Two very different movies in each case.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the movie left out a big part of what made it interesting. Hollywood has this awful tendency to simplify things.

      Take Saruman, for instance. In the books he's an interesting character, and in the movie he's just a bad guy.

      The thing to Saruman is that he's not really on the "evil side". He was playing a very dangerous game with Sauron, and wasn't anything like his minion. Rather, he wanted to obtain the ring for himself. He cunningly convinced everybody that the One Ring was lost, so that he could seek it, and have it for himself. That should make it clear enough that he's not on Sauron's side, and only pretends to be.

      Gandalf wrecked his plans. The hobbits escaped, and the idiot Grima threw the Palantir from a window. Gandalf took his power from him. Now he's got a problem with Sauron, who will think that he was betrayed, and that Saruman just refuses to use the Palantir. Saruman was left in the annoying situation of having to sit in his tower defending against the Nazgul, and pretty much everybody else.

      So, he left his tower at last, and went where it'd hurt Gandalf most: to the Shire, and took over it. He ruled over it brutally until he was stabbed by Grima, who was really sick of him.

      If you think of it, Saruman in the books caused his own downfall. He wasn't just a defeated pawn that served Sauron. Rather, he had his own very ambitious ideas, and plenty failings that made him end up as he did.

    5. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      People love Jackson for making fantasy movies that aren't unwatchably bad. Before he did the LoTR trilogy, the total number of non-horrible fantasy movies to come out of Hollywood (Excluding Disneys kiddie movies) could by counted on one hand by discriminating viewers, and two hands by less picky people. There was a great fear that the whole thing would be bungled and turned into a barely coherent mess - after all, nobody else has handled the rings story well since Das Nibelungen was turned into a silent film.

      Jackson's attempts to transfer the books to screen wasn't perfect, but nobody was expecting it to be. The fact that he didn't butcher it and churn out a piece of shit like "Legend" or "Dungeons and Dragons," however, endeared him to all the fanboys out there who just wanted fantasy that didn't suck.

    6. Re:What's so great about Peter Jackson by oGMo · · Score: 1
      But what the movie featured, ultimatly, very ugly people in a war with very pretty people, and the very pretty people won and established a dictatorship.

      Did I miss something?

      In the movie? Not really. My best advice is go read the book; it's almost entirely different, besides the names of things and a vaguely general idea of events. And try to forget the movie's imagery, too.

      To study LotR, you must also study Tolkien and the time period he was living in. Tolkien loved the natural world: trees, in particular, which is why they come up as imagery so much. Tolkien wrote this during a time when WW2 was going on and industrialism was blackening the skies and countryside. This is one of the many places the movie gets it entirely wrong and misses the point. Remember in the beginning of the movie, in the Shire, where everything is slightly surreal and fairy-like, and later the world seemed more "down-to-earth"? This is precisely the opposite of the books. The Shire was the "down-to-earth", everyday sort of place where hobbits didn't have adventures. As they left, they entered a "larger-than-life" world where industrialism (orcs, their machines, saruman) were fighting with nature (the elves), at the same time Sauron (a more sinister evil) was getting ready to war. See the parallels?

      There are more; as various nations were trying to use industrialism to try and fight their war, so Saruman was using machines, and ultimately trying to get the Ring, to fight Sauron. Tom Bombadil (who didn't appear in the movie and is trivialized by many) directly represented nature, didn't care about the affairs of men at all; so the natural world cares little for our wars and affairs.

      The movie, of course, trivializes and mixes this all up. Peter Jackson seems to have at best a shallow understanding and passing acquaintance with the story. I doubt anyone in Hollywood can really grasp beyond "ooh, shiny! pretty people vs ugly people, pretty people win!" In reality, there was a reason for the beauty of the elves and the ugliness of the orcs. (And the final parallel, where the elves, nature, fade, the kingdom of men, industry and 20th-century society, take over.)

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  8. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UNCONFIRM RUMOR ABOUT MOVIE HALO 2 FOUND UNTRUE!!!

    This is slashdot right?

    I'm looking around and I dont see a lame gif of Harry Knowles so it must be.

    seriously Zonk this was deemed news worthy?
    Whats next a scathing review of Blood Rayne?

  9. An image tattered by steveo777 · · Score: 1
    Jackson's got too much class for a videogame adaption. Even one that really shouldn't be too hard to make. It's going to be a war movie just like all other war movies. The only difference is that millions of people are already engrossed in the... story. So, without further ado, here's what you won't miss.

    Master Chief (always accompanied by gruff, bad-ass voice: Well, looks like my suit is even better equiped to deal with the Covenent armada.

    (enter subplot) Arbiter (always a high-distingued, but also just plain high, mysterious voice): Except the good Covenent. Remeber, the Elite don't want to destroy the humans. At least, not untill we've finished dealing with those overgrown apes.

    MC: Oh, forgot about the flood. Gotta shoot the shit outta them on the way.

    A: Damn right, Cheif. Watch out, though. There might be another playable charecter for the flood. It's the next logical step

    five cases of beer, 7 million rounds of ammunition and plasma, countless disposable marine deaths, 12 hours of sheild charging, a few stickies, and two ring explosions later

    MC: Wasn't that awesome when I stickied that brute and he blew up?!

    A: Hell yeah, wasn't it great when I snipered that jackel's head while he wasn't looking?

    MC: Hey, I wonder if Cortana does lap dances?

    Cortana: Aw, shit.

    THE END

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:An image tattered by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I want to see a film that includes a 'ring explosion.'

    2. Re:An image tattered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too much class?

      so is class something you get from making rediculous visual masturbations of a series of books, then collecting all the coin from the books fans?

      Sounds to me like Uwe Boll will be the next Peter Jackson simply because of all the Halo fanboy coin. . .

  10. The green valleys and lush terrain of New Zealand? by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Troll
    Why not Sam Raimi then?

    Hey, it makes just as much sense.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  11. Jackson and Sci-Fi. by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 0

    Good. I'm glad he doesn't waste his Sci-Fi luck before he makes the third Star Wars trilogy. (*wink wink nudge nudge*)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  12. Uwe Boll? by NNland · · Score: 1

    Who in the hell ever decided that Uwe Boll should get any money for making movies? That no-talent hack has been making crap movies for years (just take a look at the ratings offered on IMDB). I don't care if he's been making movies since he was a child with Hi-8, I bet they were crap too.

    If they hand the Halo adaptation off to him, Microsoft will be destroying their Halo brand.

    What will it take for companies to tell Uwe Boll to drown himself? Seriously?

  13. Seriously, why Halo? by quantax · · Score: 1

    I saw this and first thought, "Good" since I'd rather Peter Jackson do something a bit more original like a Hobbit movie since theres something to the original content in the first place. Halo was a fun game and all, but seriously, much like a Doom movie, what are you really left with? Thin plot (better than Doom, but lets face it, science fiction books covered Halo's territory about 20 - 30 years previously and did it a lot better) with a whole lot of gun fire & explosions. Not to say this isnt entertaining but really, seems unneeded with the abundant availability of action movies.

    That rolls into my real comment: frig Halo, why not take a real step and make a Ringworld movie? You already have a symbol that everyone recognizes (the Halo), and you could easily market it as 'the thing that inspired Halo'. Right there, you've got the serious scifi geeks and the Halo fanboys in 1 scoop. I admit Ringworld would need to be 'spiced' up a tiny bit to keep watchers attention since the book was more of an exploration of a world rather than a character-centric story. But even there, you have excellent character diversity: the puppeteer, the human male & female, and the feline-like Kzin. Just have writers improve upon the dialogue & create more character interest without ignoring the fact that its really the Ringworld that is the true focus. I do not consider Ringworld to be my favorite science fiction stories or even really high up on that list, but really, if Slashdot is going to talk about making a movie about a game based on a book, we might as well skip all the mainstreaming and go straight back to the source. Who knows, we may even get a decent movie out of it.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
  14. They should get Sean Stewart and Elan Lee to write the screenplay. They're the only ones to make a compelling story out of Halo yet.

    Seriously...didn't they basically make a Halo movie (sans video) with I Love Bees? Oh wait, we're not supposed to talk about that. Our delicate nerd sensibilities are offended by the smell of advertising, and Halo fanboys hate to hear that something they didn't have to pay fifty dollars for had better writing and voice acting than their adorable little "BEST GMAE EVAR!" Cognitive dissonance, kiddos. Look it up. Wait, no, I'll save you the trouble.

  15. Re:Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ringworld, if properly done, could be the best SciFi movie of all time. The book is written in an extremely visual style that would translate to the screen excellently. Until recently the technology to do it well was not available, but if the film industry feels that a puppeteer can now be convincingly be portrayed, it is time!