Red Hat and HP Establish Linux Storage Lab
Rob writes "Linux distributor Red Hat has teamed up with Hewlett-Packard to create a new
performance test lab to help customers deploy enterprise storage across Linux
environments. The lab will focus on performance and integration testing in order to
produce best practices and solutions guides, the companies said, and
will also enable customers to preview new technological developments."
they do performance tests on
1) postgres with large data sets over SATA and IDE hard drives.
2) mysql with large data sets over SATA and IDE hard drives.
3) both of the above over www.coraid.com.
p.s.
coraid drivers are gpl and part of the kernel already.
Some information on the Global File System can be found here and here.
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
Is that too much to ask from a major computer vendor that claims to support Linux? I do not think so.
Another option for HP could be selling a blank system, and let the end user worry about the OS. With this approach, HP neatly avoids any liability, and still can be seen to be tacitly suppporting Linux.
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
People start shedding fears of the penguin. It's an alternative and it's very much user friendly. I predict that soon the users community will shift/accept it even at home. Although I see Novell(suse) making more progress there. Red Hat recently announced that GFS is now supported by Oracle for use with Real Application Cluster database configurations, and has been certified for use with EMC's Clariion networked storage systems, and Celerra iSCSI network attached storage systems, as well as Network Appliance's SAN interfaces BTW HP has been offering RAC on RHEL already for a long time now. Althoug hte GFS will certainly avoid the need of running the HP clsuterware(I hope) tool.
Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
This is mostly a webvertisment/reference for deploying GFS on HP Proliant server hardware.
Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
to announce a Linux partnership?
It was almost a given that HP would team up with some major Linux distro, given that they have a fair sized share of the corporate market. I'd open my eyes a little more if Dell or another primarily HSB (Home and Small Business) OEM were to start to offer Linux systems.
Of course, it'd also be nice if some of those manufacturers would also add Linux support for their peripheral products. There's so few good drivers for printers/scanners/all-in-ones, especially from HP (which I do tech support for), and tbh I don't have the coding skills to build my own. It's probably a big reason that Linux use is still relatively light on the HSB side.
SATA disks is possibly true. To those of you who say "What??! Ordinary SATA disks on mission critical servers??!" - even high end enterprise storage systems (like EMC Symmetrix) use ordinary disks.
Being seasoned in Linux enterprise deployments, I've had more than my share of frustration with some of HP's own storage appliances. Their entry-level storage appliances, the MSA series (which IIRC, they inherited from Compaq), seem to be pretty ok, but they're no good when you start growing to the point when more than several machines need to attach to the SAN. The VA series of high-end storage appliances are in contrast the very devil to deal with. I remember the problems a client of ours was having with these monsters when they were using it for Oracle 9i RAC. Their RAID management started having problems once the disks started filling up to more than 75% capacity, and HP never was able to give us a satisfactory solution, except to replace the damn storage array with something bigger and much more expensive. And so overtures from the likes of EMC began to reach much more receptive ears...
I certainly hope this helps with the engineering of HP's storage appliance line, and they can fix some of the brain damage that some of them have.
Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
I've heard of some shady tactics in my time working for a larger PC OEM, but *never* a mention of this. The shipping out of winmodems (and similar components) was done for reasons of cost, not to reduce interoperability.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
MS would throw a fit. Anyone who doesn't want windows on their box is clearly going to pirate windows. Therefor the logic is to charge you even more when you don't get windows preinstalled as you're going to be pirating it anyway.
SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!