Slashdot Mirror


Lightning Fusion And Other Hot News

DumbSwede writes "PhysOrg.com reports that according to calculations by B.M. Kuzhevsky, the head of the neutron research lab at Moscow State University, neutron levels far above normal background levels exist during lightning strikes. While only a small percentage of rainwater contains atoms of deuterium, the lightning still provides enough energy to create fusion events. Frequent Slashdot readers no doubt remember recent articles on Fusion induced by sonic compression and more recently by pyroelectric effect. Perhaps more controversially, and yet to be discussed on Slashdot, the NIF has possible plans for a hybrid fusion approach that uses not only deuterium and tritium, but uranium and plutonium as well in what amounts to a miniaturized version of how thermonuclear weapons achieve fusion. Fears are that this could lead directly to micro-H-bombs. This year has also seen the final selection of France for the ITER experimental Fusion Reactor site. With all the recent discoveries and developments in fusion research, my question for Slashdotters - are we on the verge of something big that will make fusion a practical reality in a much shorter time frame than the often quoted '30 years away, and always will be'?"

14 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. We'll never get fusion! by AsmCoder8088 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we were supposed to have invented a good process for fusion reactors, Doc would have showed up by now and shown us his MrFusion plans!

  2. Why, yes. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > With all the recent discoveries and developments in fusion research, my question for Slashdotters - are we on the verge of something big that will make fusion a practical reality in a much shorter time frame than the often quoted '30 years away, and always will be'?"

    "Why, yes, we are on the verge of something big that will make fusion a practical reality in a much shorter time frame than the often quoted '30 years away, and always will be', and we always will be!"

  3. Neutron Storms by kyle90 · · Score: 3, Funny

    From now on, whenever there is a thunderstorm; I am going to refer to it as a neutron storm. That just sounds so cool.

    --
    Real_men_don't_need_spacebars.
    1. Re:Neutron Storms by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just reverse the polarity; that always works.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
  4. 1.21 Gigawatts! by xCepheus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dr. Emmett Brown: No no no, this sucker's electrical, but it requires a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need.

    So... what the article is saying is that Dr. Brown used the electricity from the lightning strike, instead of plutonium, to generate the nuclear reaction to generate the electricity to power the fluxcapacitor?

    It all makes sense now?

  5. great... by simonharvey · · Score: 2, Funny
    While only a small percentage of rainwater contains atoms of deuterium, the lightning still provides enough energy to create fusion events.

    Now 'ol george is gonna commit to a war against the wheather

  6. Of Course! by Filberts · · Score: 2, Funny

    *Now* I understand why we needed to steal Plutonium from the Libyans...

  7. Uhhh... by algae · · Score: 5, Funny
    my question for Slashdotters - are we on the verge of something big that will make fusion a practical reality in a much shorter time frame?

    And my answer for you, Zonk, as it frequently is for giant world-changing questions like these, is, "How the hell should I know? I'm a freakin' sysadmin."

    --
    Causation can cause correlation
  8. Hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hardware: Lightning Fusion And Other Hot News

    Since when is lightning hardware?

  9. Frequent Slashdot readers by Rescate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frequent Slashdot readers no doubt remember recent articles on Fusion induced by sonic compression and more recently by pyroelectric effect.

    This obviously excludes the editors.

  10. Why are you asking on an IT site by birge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't asking about nuclear fusion on an IT site kind of like asking for formula one driving tips on, well, an IT site? The only correct answer you'll get is "I have no goddam idea."

    1. Re:Why are you asking on an IT site by birge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, given that it was essentially a yes or no question, I'm sure approximately 50% of the answers will be correct. 100% of them will be within one bit of correct.

  11. Reminds me of that bash.org quote. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

    (Bismarck) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes!!!!
    (Bismarck) France is going to house the new nuclear fusion reactor!
    (Bismarck) If it suceeds, cheap long term energy. If it fails, BAM! France is gone!
    (Bismarck) It's win win!
  12. Giant leap! by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...are we on the verge of something big that will make fusion a practical reality in a much shorter time frame than the often quoted '30 years away, and always will be'?"

    Yes, from now on it will only (perpetually) be 20 years away...