How Would You Define a Planet?
It doesn't come easy asks: "The argument over the definition of a planet continues. So far, two definitions are favored but without much consensus so far: base the definition of a planet simply on an object's size. Pluto would be near the lower limit and the newly discovered Kuiper Belt objects could also qualify, giving us 10 or 11 planets so far; or define the single dominant body in its immediate neighborhood as the only qualifying object for planetary status. If no one body dominated (such as the millions of individual asteroids in the asteroid belt) then none would qualify for planetary status. In this case Pluto would be disqualified (Neptune would be the dominant body in Pluto's region of space), and the newly discovered Kuiper Belt objects would also fail to qualify. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) working group charged with pinning down the definition of a planet may vote on the proposals within the next two weeks (or they may decide to start all over again with something new). Maybe Slashdot readers can give them some help. How would you define a planet?"
sounds good enough for me ;-)
What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
A planet is, like, one of those rocky things that goes around the sun... oh wait Jupiter is gas. Ok, it has to be like big and shit. It can't be a star though. Ok lets say 1,000km diameter minimum. If it's 1000km diameter or more, and it orbits a star, but it's not a star itself, it's a planet.
There. I just settled what thousands of "smart" astronomers with their "Ph. D's" can't figure out.
Pass the bong man...
Oataox or whatever the hell? The guy who came up with that needs to be kicked out of the Astronomy club.
"Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asstroid or cumbucket, illuminated by light from a star, such as Michael Jackson, around which it revolts.
Uncyclopedia: Planet
If it's the size of Marvin's brain, or bigger, it's a Planet.
... well, it's just depressing.
If it's smaller
Wretched, isn't it?
I suggested this on www.randi.org a few weeks ago. In Pluto's case have astrologers draw up two parallel charts. One with Pluto as a planet, the other without. After a few weeks we can compare what happened in the world to the astrology charts and that'll settle it.
"The planets don't lie" as I said there. ;)
Trolling is a art,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Planet
If you can land on it and score with an alien chick, it's a planet.
by your definition my ex-wife is a planet!
--iggy_mon - www.ananonymouskiller.com - Die Trying -
...the mice?
If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
No, duh! Stars are pointy, not round!
thats right and yo moma too
The only way to define it is obvious:
Anything you can blow up with the Death Star!
"City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
If it can support the orbit of the Deathstar then it qualifies.
Mine would be an immense solid body, somewhat ovoid in shape, covered with relatively miniscule live forms and surrounded by gaseous clouds.
Oh, wait. I just described myself.