Slashdot Mirror


Municipal Broadband Projects Spread Across U.S.

Mediacitizen writes "Media rights group Free Press has just unveiled an online broadband map showing the vast extent to which publicly supported 'Community Internet' projects have overtaken towns across the country. Hundreds of communities now have municipal broadband systems on the drawing board, despite aggressive lobbying efforts by big telephone and cable companies to derail these projects. The national map shows Community Internet is spreading like a prairie fire."

12 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. It's a Good Thing. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is how broadband was introduced to the mid-sized towns (10k-30k population) in my region a few years back. Service has been much better than I've heard delivered from the big ISPs; I've only had one or two downtimes and they only lasted a few minutes...Though I did end up having to show the cable guy how to configure a network connection properly. All he knew was "ipconfig".

    1. Re:It's a Good Thing. by Slashdot_Gandhi · · Score: 3, Insightful



      Now this is boring, but I once read an interesting article regarding the issue of communism and open source (Is open source communist?)

      I can see similar questions being raised about the "Community Internet" as well, and it makes sense why such things don't last too long in USA. The entire discussion of communism in Community Projects seems focussed around proving how evil they might be simply on the grounds of being remotely communist or hinting to be so. "Its communist so don't do it" is one of the many messages delivered in many forms.

      Basically, if an ISP can make good money off providing broadband service, why will it let a community body run such projects for free or cheap? The student loan system in USA is a vaguely related, yet relevant example. Why do we have 500+ billion for war but not for education or medicare? And free Internet?

  2. Municipal Broadband by mrclark13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's nice and all, but for most states it is at most 4 or 5 municipalities. How many thousands are in the US total? Plus, what is the impact on local taxes of providing "free" broadband. Personally, I'd rather have some free market competition to drive prices down.

    --
    "As you say - certain behaviors minimize the HIV risk and writing Slashdot tripe on Friday night is by far the most secu
    1. Re:Municipal Broadband by Burning1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean market compitition like Pacific Bell vs... well... Pacific Bell?

  3. Re:Community Net II by Zapraki · · Score: 5, Funny
    line-of-sight internet access in rural Saskatchewan
    So... that pretty much encompases the entire province I'd say.
  4. Re:Community Net II by saskboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    "So... that pretty much encompases the entire province I'd say."

    Sweet joke. Yeah they just put a tower up on Spy Hill, Wood Mountain, and Climax for redundancy, as a tower anywhere would serve all locations, or at least the edges of towns facing the towers.

    For those that don't get the joke, there are no towers in any of those three places that sound like high elevations, and SK has an un-deserved reputation for being a completely flat wheat field because that's what it looks like from the Trans Canada Highway through the southern grain belt. Nearly half of the province is actually trees, lakes, rocks, and brush.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  5. Qwest and Utopia by helix400 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sad my city voted down Utopia. Qwest sent every one of their lobbyists out to stop this plan of FTTH for every home and business in the city. They argued it would fail and cost the cities money. But if it failed, then the fiber plan would go out to the highest bidder. Obviously, Qwest could have afforded it had they known it would fail....but they knew it wouldn't fail. So they had to stop it.

    Luckily other cities voted for it. Already some are offering cheap plans for 15MB down and up, with businesses getting 30 MB down and up.

  6. Socialism . . . by Amiasian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    . . . is hereby proven to not always be a bad thing. Historic biases not withstanding.

  7. Insularband. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Hundreds of communities now have municipal broadband systems on the drawing board, despite aggressive lobbying efforts by big telephone and cable companies to derail these projects."

    Well that's all well and good, but I'll let you in on a secret. The internet is composed of linked smaller networks. Municipal broadband to be truely useful, needs to be linked to other networks. Guess who owns those links? That's right, telephone and cable. It's one thing to be insular and say "I don't need you". It's another to realize that you are just spiting your face.

    "The national map shows Community Internet is spreading like a prairie fire.""

    Ms O'Leary's cow will be glad to hear that.

  8. The Modern Library by daemonenwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The internet is to the modern age what books were to those who came before. In the past, you could be intelligent and educated if your family could afford a fairly large, private library, stocked with the expected classics. Or if you had access to one somehow, usually through a university.

    The advent of public libraries allowed common people access to the educational tools and knowledge base once held only by the social elite. This lies at the heart of the American Dream - people who labor for little or nothing can raise children who, through public education and public libraries, know a more prosperous life as their inborn potential allows. The social and financial potential of their parents no longer truly mattered.

    Today, almost anything you could want to learn exists on the internet, from home repairs to getting a foundation in some of the most advanced scientific research mankind does. Not having this access leaves you at a serious disadvantage to those who do have it. A modern city of any signifigance does not exist without a public library at its center somewhere, and, if society acts with the same wisdom as before, ways will be found to bring the internet readily to the masses. Civic access to the internet is, in this context, the only truly logical way to go.

    Besides, Orson Scott Card predicted civic net access in Ender's Game. You wanna argue against the guy?

  9. Re:Common cents by johansalk · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Broadband Reports explains that Texas Representative Pete Sessions is trying to pass the "Preserving Innovation in Telecom Act of 2005" (HR2726), which would ban towns and cities from wiring themselves for broadband.

    However Sessions is not only a 16 year ex-SBC employee, his wife works for Cingular, and he holds half a million dollars in SBC stock options, according to an e-mail being circulated today by media reform outfit Free Press.

    "Congressman Sessions is the latest poster child for corruption on Capitol Hill," says Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press."

    from http://www.dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News &file=article&sid=4255

  10. Re:Welfare for techies by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I cannot understand why people think this is a good policy. It's welfare for techies.

    Well, as one of those techies, all I can say is "Sounds good to me!" If hiring people to provide a wanted service is "welfare", I'll take the label along with the job. I've been insulted in worse ways by the neocon crowd.

    Anyway, if you're not a techie (aka "nerd"), WTF are you doing here? Didn't you read the line at the top of the main page? Do we have a non-nerd spy in our midst?

    Leaving internet access to the commercial guys makes just about as much sense as leaving the road system to them. They've had over a decade to convince us, and what they've done is supply service only to the cities. As with roads, electricity, and telephone service a century ago, they can't be bothered with the low-density areas. And now they have the gall to fight "community" internet politically. They won't supply service, and they want to make it illegal for us to supply our own service.

    If they can't and won't do the job, the hell with them. Give the job to the people who are willing to do it. (Hey, that's us techies. And a lot of our hick rural buddies out in the sticks. ;-)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.