Slashdot Mirror


C-SPAN Interviews Wikipedia Founder

TrentL writes "Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales (aka Jimbo) was recently interviewed on C-SPAN's primetime program Q&A. Topics included the origins of Wikipedia, governing philosophy, and criticisms from members of the print encyclopedia community." From the article: "I had the idea basically from watching the growth of the free software movement. So all of the software that really runs the Internet, Linux, Apache, the Web serving software, it's all written by volunteers collaboratively working together using free licenses. And it's really good quality stuff."

3 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Grammar ain't too fuckin' good, though. by markild · · Score: -1, Redundant

    So yes. I think. So that would. So be good.

    --
    Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
    Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
  2. Talk Page by JamieKitson · · Score: -1, Redundant
    Man that's some funny fucking shit.

    Including:

    "According to the article, I am 'independently wealthy'?"

    "I can't recall ever making any political donations."

    "Anyhow I don't recall anyone ever calling me the "God King" of Wikipedia"

    "I removed the text: Jimbo is an advocate of libertarianism and is strongly opposed to taxation"

    "The correct terminology is 'adult content'."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jimmy_Wales

    btw, am I the only one whos cursor blinks to the left of the subjet input box?

  3. Re:I love WIkipedia. by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wikipedia is the GeoCities of encyclopedias. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.) Everybody gets a chance to do their thing, be an instant expert on a topic. Very empowering, probably a great ice-breaker at parties. And it's free. Obviously, it's un-cite-able beyond anything wider than a circle of friends.

    The fact that it's a target for pranksters should also be obvious. Across America, in the back of schoolbuses, wagers are being made over who can give Elric of Melnibone a grandmother first, or how long that new play of Euripides will be undiscovered, or how many pro ball batting averages can be re-arranged for how long. It's fun to watch, probably fun to participate in, but you can't get bent out of shape by allowing yourself to take any of it seriously.

    If information access is a part of how you make your living, or you are a genuinely serious student, you're paying for a subscription to britannica.com. Obviously.