Microsoft, Intel back HD DVD over Blu-ray

raitchison writes "Reuters is reporting that after months of sitting on the fence in the battle over what will replace the venerable DVD that Microsoft and Intel have thrown their weight behind Toshiba's HD DVD over the Sony's Blu-ray. Better compatibility with existing DVD technology as well as lower cost were cited as reasons to back HD DVD. While this is undoubtedly a significant blow for Sony in their efforts to establish Blu-ray as the next standard it's not likely to be the end of Blu-ray."

Comments

Blue-ray taking hits

[op12]

It may not be down for the count, but Blue-Ray seems to be taking a lot of hits (From TFA and this Yahoo article:

• Cost: They [Intel and Microsoft] also said that HD DVDs would be cheaper to produce, resulting in lower prices for consumers.
• Manufacturing: Westlake also said the HD DVD camp has made inroads with manufacturers in China, where most of the world's DVD players are currently built. Without that support, it would be difficult to quickly deploy the technology at a low price. "(Blu-ray) does not have that relationship and we're concerned about whether that offering of Chinese players will be there. We know HD DVD will be," Westlake said.
• Speed to market: "Blu-ray is very robust, but it's also not here," said Richard Doherty, research director for the Envisioneering Group. "The PC industry has clearly backed the system that is weeks away from commercialization."

That's just my impression from these two articles...feel free to add a counterpoint. The article did mention Blue-Ray disputes the cost and time-to-production arguments, and some major Hollywood studios back it.

Re:Blue-ray taking hits

[Ngwenya]

Speed to market: "Blu-ray is very robust, but it's also not here," said Richard Doherty, research director for the Envisioneering Group. "The PC industry has clearly backed the system that is weeks away from commercialization."

Hmm. I know that HP has most definitely backed Blu-Ray. http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2004/04111 5c.html. So have Dell (http://news.com.com/HP%2C+Dell+back+Blu-ray+techn ology/2100-1041_3-5139694.html) I guess that they aren't part of the PC industry any more - just the two largest manufacturers of err... PCs.

And "Envisioneering?". Dear God...

--Ng

Re:Betamax v. VHS

[stupidfoo]

Why wait? Why do we even discuss this? Dual format players are already announced by major players like Samsung.

This format war was over before it even began. Isn't this the exact same discussion we were having about the DVD+-RW format issues? And now everyone has drives that support everything and it's a moot point.

Re:Yes of course...

[scharkalvin]

"DVD-RAM died a painful death, probably in some part thanks to DVD burners getting out quickly there after. "

Actually the stories about the death of dvd-ram are not really true.
While not a mainstay, dvd-ram has enjoyed a comeback in home dvd recorders, especially
those made by Toshiba and Panasonic. DVD-ram allows you to watch a program while it is
being recorded, and you can rewind, pause, or fast-forward (not all the way!) while
still recording. DVD-RAM disks no longer require the cartdrige, though they are a good
idea for the double sided disks. They also have a MUCH longer lifespan, dvd-rw's last about
1000 rw cycles, the dvd-ram disks go for at least 10,000 (or was that 100,000?).

You can find dvd-ram drives for your computer. Most of these will also READ cd's (r and rw)
as well as dvd-rom and dvd+/- r/rw's. Someone even makes a combo drive that handles
WRITING dvd-ram AND dvd+/- r/rw disks! That drive isn't as fast as the dvd-ram-less
units though.

You can buy blank dvd-ram media at Wal*Mart, Ratshack, Target, and many other stores
(anybody that sells Panasonic dvd recorders). Media price varies, but I've seen them for
less than $3 each (sometimes MUCH less in 3 or 5 packs).

Re:Is that really the reason?

[Brahmastra]

It's not like sony isn't going to have some form of DRM...

To protect high definition contents from unauthorised duplication, HD-DVD chose the successor of CSS called AACS (Advanced Access Control System), while Blu-ray invented a proprietary algorithm called BD-CPS (although Blu-ray might decide in the end to use AACS too). Quite interestingly, both technologies are very similar, proprietary ciphers and algorithms from CSS have been abandoned for state-of-the-art key exchange, symmetric/asymmetric encryption and hashing algorithms (AES, T-DES, ...).

The full article is here:
http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/186/3

On thier own?

[SuperKendall]

Take a look lower at the list of companies in the Blu-Ray consoritum. It is substantial and really a more impressive overall list than the HD-DVD camp.

Blu-Ray is hardly a Sony solo effort, and is technically superior to boot. If one had been more open with less DRM I would say a choice could be made based on that but from the DRM standpoint both suck equally; for data backup from a computer Blu-Ray holds more and is a clear winner.