Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Lightning Plans to Unify Mail & Calendar

Neil writes "The Mozilla Foundation has published an initial roadmap for 'Lightning', the project to integrate its calendar application Sunbird with its email application Thunderbird."

36 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Why not by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Funny

    just integrate everything - thunderbird, firefox and sunbird into one big application ?

    1. Re:Why not by GungaDan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes... and call it 'Mozilla...' ;-)

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:Why not by superyanthrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or call it Seamonkey instead, b/c Mozilla Suite isn't supported by the foundation any more, and they only put out security updates.

      http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

    3. Re:Why not by n0-0p · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is actually an intelligent response to everyone making this same tired joke. The Mozilla Foundation retargeted development on seperate applications to simplify things for most users. With that done, one of the next major steps (2.0 timeframe) is to break all the shared functionality out into XulRunner (currently being actively developed).

      Eventually all of the apps (FF, TB, SB) will use XulRunner but still be developed and distributed as seperate applications. This should provide the best of both worlds. It will have the tight integration and lower resource usage of the single suite, but without requiring everyone to deal with the headaches of one big monolithic application.

      To anyone interested I'd really advise heading over to the Mozilla wiki and taking a look at what's going.

    4. Re:Why not by mbbac · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should obviously rename Seamonkey to be Firemonkey or Thundermonkey.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:Why not by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And another project takes a page out of the KDE development book. :) This is exactly the process taken by the Kontact project. A container application that integrates multiple separate applications into a cohesive whole. You can run the individual apps (KMail, KAddressbook, KNotes, Akregator, Todo, Journal, KNode, etc) as separate applications, or you can run Kontact which provides a nice sidebar with links to each component, and gives you a single window for everything.

      Best of both worlds: those that want individual apps can use them as such, and those that like the "everything under the sun integrated together" can use it as such.

    6. Re:Why not by shokk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mozilla Foundation minutes
      9/25/2005

      12:01pm
      Unfortunately the name "clownpenis" was taken, so we had to go with SeaMonkey. Not a lot of good names out there. Can you believe Phil wanted to go with WebRazer and Mary wanted us to use Daphodill? Bunch of amateurs.

      3:37pm
      Had a good laugh at the bug reports, like this one for making Slashdot.org format properly. Whew, fortunately the guys running the web site are working around our bug and doing the work for us. Check!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  2. Critical Bug Fix... or Feature? by stlhawkeye · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...will make the combined application more attractive to corporate users, although they're not specifically targeting Microsoft Outlook.

    ...will include fixes for the most important bugs, such as those that cause the loss of data.

    Wait... now come on, who ELSE are they targetting? Gotta be MS Outlook users. Nobody uses Oracle Corporate Time. If they want to win over MS users they ought to leave bugs in the software that cause catastrophic data loss. It's what MS users are used to.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    1. Re:Critical Bug Fix... or Feature? by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Funny

      Absolutely. Catastrophic data loss is the only thing that keeps our users from filling up their hard-drives.

    2. Re:Critical Bug Fix... or Feature? by xgamer04 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, if the Mozilla crew can put together a mail + calendar app that has the usability of Firefox, I'd switch to it. I've never used Outlook, but I do want to ditch my crappy Palm Desktop software.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    3. Re:Critical Bug Fix... or Feature? by PhilipPeake · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Evolution is not an answer.

      What needs to be targetted is not Outlook, but Exchange. Having an Outlook copy/rip-off (Evolution) is useless for real enterprise use without the functionality provided by Exchange, which means integrated/shared calendar/email/directory, and to get that you have to be running a Windows box or two (or twenty) loaded with Exchange in your data center.

      Microsoft (IMHO) think Evolution is wonderful. It saves them having to port Outlook to Linux, but still requires the high profit-margin, locke-in, proprietary servers (Evolution) in the background. Why do you think they havn't been screaming "IP Infringement!" about Evolution?

      This will be a different animal. It will run on top of standard protocol (IMAP, HTTP/CalDAV) and will cut Windows and Exchange right out of the picture. It will succeed where others - notably Sun, have failed -- Sun has a 100% solid mail server, a (now) solid calendar server, and a (still somewhat funky) address book server, but fails to capture real enterprise customers because they absolutely refuse to build an integrated desktop client.

      Microsoft will NOT like this. They can see the writing on the wall for the Office suite, and this is liable to hit their only other really profitable hook into the commercial data center - Exchange.

  3. Thank god by DoorFrame · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time. Now all they've got to do is make a version of the mail program for my palm pilot/windows mobile device and I can stop using Outlook.

  4. going to a new Mozilla suite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Coming in 2006: The new Mozilla suite (TM). With Firefox browser, and new calendar featured Thunderbird.

  5. Re:New? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative
    I thought a calendar was already available for Thunderbird as a plugin.

    It is, and yet Thunderbird still isn't a suitable replacement for Outlook in corporate environments. From what I understand, Lightning aims to fix that.

  6. Modular by Helios1182 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think modularity is the way to go. Kontact in KDE does it right. Each app (address, email, calendar) are self contained apps that can be run individualy, but Kontact ties them all together ala Outlook/Evolution if you want to use it that way.

  7. "Integration" by oGMo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The roadmap says:

    Lightning 0.2
    • Better Thunderbird integration
      • email<->task linkage
      • IMIP support
    • Improved CalDAV support

    My first thought at seeing the article was "integration? I thought the point was to separate them", but this seems to mean "integrate" like "let's make them talk better".

    The article on the other hand seems to misunderstand and say "the combined application" and imply they're building one big Thunderbird/Sunbird conglomerate. I don't think this is the case, reading the roadmap. Anyone have more data on this?

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  8. Emulating Outlook 2003? by vertinox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The one question you would have to ask would it support an ecxhange server?

    If not... Can they pull of "Exchange-like" behavior with calenders and meetings on a pop server?

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Emulating Outlook 2003? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Informative
      The one question you would have to ask would it support an ecxhange server?

      No. Exchange uses calendaring uses RPC/MAPI or WebDAV.

      If not... Can they pull of "Exchange-like" behavior with calenders and meetings on a pop server?

      No. They use CalDAV for calendar sharing.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  9. Thunderbird by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Informative
    The biggest show-stopper for Thunderbird for me was that people would send me little vcs notifications from Outlook and they would just sit in my mozilla inbox as weird looking files rather than get inserted into the calendar. You could import them manually but it was a hassle. I went searching for a solutions but the mozilla people would point their fingers at the thunderbird and the thunderbird people would point their fingers at mozilla and I don't have time to do the job myself so when I was asked if there was an alternative to Outlook... (Calendering is one of the supreme needs of the suits).

    An integration will be most welcome. Though too late to make any big difference here, I still use Mozilla myself and would be happy not to have to decode VCS files in my head.

    Rich

  10. Re:Dogfood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "dogfood bugs" are usability issues, according to:
    http://www.mozilla.org/editor/dogfood.html

  11. Re:Dogfood? by SneakyNinja · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it's from the term 'eating their own dogfood' which means using the tool you're developing. ie, during the build of NT, Dave Cutler made the developers use the beta builds of NT, and it was termed 'eating their own dogfood'.

    This probably means the devs are using the product and mean to fix the bugs they've logged.

  12. Re:New? by Ixne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool... so now all my friends can schedule my time for me without asking, just like my boss does!

  13. Re:Why? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Why is an integrated calendar and communications product a "good thing"."

    Um... because communications often lead to appointments.

    "Why not include a file manager and image editor while we're at it?"

    See previous point.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. Dammit. by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just when I thought we'd finally standardized on a naming convention that nobody could easily mis-spell, now I'm going to have to put up with a hojillion references to "lightening."

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  15. Re:Dogfood? by pyros · · Score: 4, Informative
    What exactly is a "dogfood bug," in this context?

    Any bug that prevents them from using the project internally as their official corporate calendar app.

  16. Article title misleading by augustz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Lightning is the working project name for an extension to tightly integrate calendar functionality (scheduling, tasks, etc.) into Thunderbird.

    Thunderbird is doing what it always does. Keep a lightweight email client around, but for those who want/need calander, they can install an extension to give it to them. A lot of good ideas show up in this.

    Futher, this is not a Mozilla Foundation annoucement.

    Q. Will this be Mozilla Lightning(TM)? Is this an official Mozilla Foundation product?
    A. "Lightning" is simply a project code name to keep from having to type or say "Thunderbird extension for tightly-integrated calendar functionality" all the time. The Mozilla Foundation has not yet announced any plans to add Lightning to its set of supported products under any name; indeed, such an announcement would be premature, as the exact composition of Lightning is still very much under discussion.


    A good wiki page on it all is here: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:Lightning
  17. reminder function, please! by pointbeing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I pitched Outlook for Thunderbird with the Calendar plugin and was happy it migrated all my data from Outlook 2k3 into something a little more standard.

    The only thing I've really missed is a reminder feature for the calendar - I still have to fire up Outlook about once a week to get reminders but I don't use it for email anymore.

    Don't know if Sunbird incorporates a reminder feature and couldn't find anything about it on mozilla.org, but I sure hope so. Developers, if you haven't got a reminder feature yet I could really use one ;-)

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
    1. Re:reminder function, please! by cyrl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, Sunbird is a standalone calendaring application and has "alarms" instead of "reminders" but they do exactly the same thing. I also switched from Outlook to Thunderbird about a year ago, and the only problem I had was getting the HTML eMail exported from Outlook. It would always re-import as plain text, with all the HTML code as text.

  18. Ford and Pontiac? by Null537 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sunbird and Thunderbird coming together? Did somebody run a red light?

  19. Calendar Integration a Good Idea by geoffrobinson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my experience in the business world, Outlook is kept around for its calendar and its integration with other apps. It's not that email in and of itself has to be handled by Outlook.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  20. Re:New? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's probably not an "excuse". There aren't any real drop-in replacements for Outlook's functionality in Windows.

    What's even worse is the situation on the Mac side. Microsoft doesn't even make a real OSX Exchange client. There's Outlook 2001, which only runs in OS9/Classic, and then there's Entourage, which is buggy, unstable, doesn't work properly, and generally stinks. Otherwise, you're stuck with webmail or a normal IMAP client.

    In short, there is not a single OSX application that properly supports Exchange. Public folders are near useless. You can't share mailboxes, calendars, contacts, etc. Meeting requests don't even work properly.

    On linux, at least you have Evolution. Evolution is a pretty good Outlook replacement, but the Windows port isn't done, and Novell hasn't announced any plans for an OSX version (as far as I know).

  21. Do you want a 'friggin' pony with that?... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Informative
    How about adding frigging exchange support to the calendaring app....

    I guess no one on the entire Mozilla Calendar team or the user community, for that matter, has thought of that right? :)

    Not trying to give you a hard time, but what you're asking for would be very, very, difficult. You would essentially have to reverse engineer Microsoft's MAPI over RPC protocol. Many have tried, none have succeeded. Or, if you only support newer versions of Exchange with OWA turned on, use Microsoft's WebDAV based calendar schema built on Exchange WebAccess, like Evolution does.

    Mozilla is doing the best they could I think, they're basing their app on a protocol on the IETF standards track http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-dusseault-c aldav/ If an organization wants to get rid of Exchange entirely, they then can give their Outlook users a MAPI plugin that supports CalDAV. We're an opensource plugin at OpenConnector.org.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  22. Re:New? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think if ANYONE would port Evolution to OSX, you'd see it capture a decent share of whatever OSX machines are in corporate settings (for what that's worth). Entourage seriously stinks. Microsoft didn't even release Exchange connectivity until Apple started providing limited support through their "Mail".

    Even then, Exchange support is pretty well crap. They've just cobbled together the IMAP support and LDAP support so that you can set them both up with one "Account settings" wizard. Gee, thanks. I still have to manually clear out my keychain every now and then to keep Entourage from locking my Windows account.

    And don't get me started on Palm. So much potential, they even bought out Be, and they haven't done jack. Their new models bump up the RAM a little. Wowwie! I with they'd get a clue, toss the Hotsync method of transferring files, get rid of their Palm Desktop software (like you said), support OSX properly, and make a useful product for once. Open-source BeOS while you're at it. Instead it looks like they're just going to move to Windows Mobile and compete directly with Axims and iPaqs.

  23. I don't think the Thunderbird plugin does much yet by sillypixie · · Score: 3, Informative

    You would think so. But it doesn't seem to work that way.

    I installed the plugin not long ago, with the expectation that at MINIMUM, you would be able to drag & drop .ics calendar attachments into the calendar. Automatic detection of scheduling requests would be even better.

    It doesn't appear to do even that. As far as I could see, the only way to get scheduling requests into the calendar (regardless of whether you use Sunbird or the Thunderbird plugin) is to save the .ics file to your hard drive and then use the "import" command to import the event.

    Therefore, as far as I can tell, the only advantage to using the Thunderbird plugin at this time, is that it sits in the Thunderbird directory instead of its own directory. And that you open it as a switch to the thunderbird command, instead of as a separate command. Whoop-dee-doo. Not to say that I don't understand that this is a work-in-progress, I am aware of that. I'm sure that .ics detection or drag/drop is high on the to-do list. I still find Sunbird useful, and I'm using it now. I just don't see that there is any level of actual email/calendar integration yet.

    I would love to be wrong about this by the way. Maybe somebody will reply to this and tell me that the plugin has lots of very useful bits - but as long as I have to manage my .ics attachments myself, I can't think of the plugin as getting me much.

    Pix

    --
    don't mess with those geekgrrls
  24. This will take a long time... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but it will be worth it. The goal, of course, is standards-based functionality for PIM (Personal Information Management) software. Yes, people really do want a replacement for Outlook, and the open source community would do well to offer complete, end-to-end solutions. Combine the Lightning client with standards-based servers and you've got a good shot at finally getting people to dump Outlook and Exchange.

    Here's the thing, though: everyone seems to assume that we need an "Outlook Killer" and an "Exchange Killer." This is, in fact, not true. "One size fits all" only works for Microsoft because Microsoft forces that model. In an ideal world, everyone will select the products that fit them best, and those products will all work together. That means some folks might choose Lightning, some might choose Aethera instead, and they'd still be able to interact with each other's calendars. On the server side, the dozen or so open source groupware servers such as Kolab, OGo, Citadel, and PHPgroupware would all be able to speak common protocols with Lightning and other clients. Users would choose based on other features; for example, one organization might want strong support for forms-based workflow, another might want rich real-time communications, another might want a large selection of third-party plugins. The idea is to allow people to choose their software based on the feature set, rather than by being locked into one choice because, for example, only Exchange supports all the features of Outlook.

    It's going to take a lot of cooperation but we'll get there.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  25. Office 2004 SP2 fixes that. by Daltorak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft has spent the last year working almost solely on improving Entourage to work better with Exchange. Last week they released Office 2004 Service Pack 2, which contains improvements to everything you've noted as being problems: Public folder support; sharing of mailboxes, calendars, contacts; complete global address list support; ability to do delegation... and so on and so forth. More information on MS's website.