Slashdot Mirror
Stem Cells Restore Feeling In Paraplegic
Vicissidude writes "According to WorldNetDaily scientists in Korea report using umbilical cord blood stem cells to restore feeling and mobility to a spinal-cord injury patient. The research, published in the peer-reviewed journal Cytotherapy, centered on a woman who had been a paraplegic 19 years due to an accident. After an infusion of umbilical cord blood stem cells, stunning results were recorded: 'The patient could move her hips and feel her hip skin on day 15 after transplantation. On day 25 after transplantation her feet responded to stimulation.'"
Wow, given this potential, I am surprised this work was not published in one of the bigger journals like Science or Nature? Perhaps it was submitted? I cannot get this particular journal with our institutional subscription, so I cannot examine the article first hand.
However, giving them the benefit of the doubt, it is too bad the field of stem cell research in the US has been badly damaged by policies the current Whitehouse administration have put into place. A good number of scientific teams formerly here in the US have had to leave the country to continue their work and others are having to modify their protocols to use one of the "acceptable" lines of stem cells the Bush administration in their infinite wisdom have seen fit to approve for scientists that want to continue to receive federal funding for their work.
It should be noted that it is not just patients who have been paralyzed that can potentially benefit from this work. Other potential therapies to come out of stem cell work include treatments for heart disease, retinal vision loss disorders, Parkinson's disease, Cystic Fibrosis and many others.
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
If god wanted her to walk, he would have allowed it through the use of stem cells. Oh, wait, he has.
End transmission.
However, giving them the benefit of the doubt, it is too bad the field of stem cell research in the US has been badly damaged by policies the current Whitehouse administration have put into place.
It's too bad that the OP doesn't understand that umbilical cord blood stem cells are not embryonic stem cells, but rather adult stem cells. But you and he are obviously blinded by politics because you fail to see that the US government is funding this kind of research very heavily.
(BTW, there are ethics involved in research of all kinds, in engineering, in law, in business, etc. You simply do not agree with the idea that ethics should be a part of stem cell research.)
I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
While I agree that aportion = killing babies, RTFA... It was adult Stem cells NOT embryonic.
Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
I'm not entirely sure what these pictures are of but I know enough to know they aren't what they're supposed to be of.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
I'm confused. You say nerver cells grow at 1mm per year. What about when a kid grows up but a few inches in that year. How does that work then, magic?
In legal terms, it's not a ban. In PRACTICAL terms, it is a ban. If all the equipment in a lab was bought with federal funds (which is the way most labs in the US are), how can you do any ES cell research? Build a new lab from scratch, not using any federal funds? In practical terms, how is that possible? Fortunately, some of the states (which traditionally have nothing to do with biomedical research funding) are stepping in and rectifying the idiocy of the federal government.
I work at a general store, and the odd time I get this person (with his aid) that doesn't have any hands... he doesn't have any eyes... he can't be more than 3 feet tall... he's hunched over almost to his waist... he can't speak... in essence (as you put it), he's a steamed prawn. Is he still a human, even though the kid is hard to look at sometimes?
What if you had a child that looked like that? Would you banish him to the middle of the desert and let the steamed prawn shrivel up?
how the hell does research designed to limit the threat of life-changing illness or injury not fall under the umbrella of national security?
Can you show me where in the USA Constitution where it says health is the responsibility of the government?
A) having problems with it in terms of federalist principals
Seeing as how federalist principals stand for small government not large government it seems you're the one with problems of uderstanding federalism.
I'd like to see more of MY tax dollars go into medical research and less into military spending.
I'd prefer to see less of MY tax dollars going to both the military and to medical research.
if we had spent HALF of the money we have over the last century on military, and put it into medical research, we just might have been able to increase the life expectancy of our people by 5 years (aiding the illimination of cancers would do this, without question), increased the general health of the populace considerably, and recieve the added financial benefits of being the world leaders in the medical field
And if taxes weren't high to pay for all this by the feds then the private and commercial sectors would have more money to spend on research. And job creation.
So I seriously don't know how you can get off on a constitutional arguement against scientific research.
And how can you get off on saying the constitution allows tax spending for scientific research? Though I've looked, read, and reread other than where the constitution allows congress to grant copyrights and patents I see nowhere where it deligates this power. Maybe I missed it so can you point out where it says otherwise? Maybe it's in Article 1 Section 8 - Powers of Congress but I don't see it.
Consider that Benjemin Franklin was one of our founding fathers and one of the drafters of the consitution. He strongly supported the idea of government funded research.
And I wonder what Thomas Jefferson, James Jay, and James Madison who all loved small government would say to you? Though a bit later I know what Col. David Crockett would of said, "Not Yours To Give". Heck, I'd like to see NASA privatized as well. What many don't realize is that the USA Constitution is a limit on what government can do, the 10th Admendment even spells it out:
Amendment X - Powers of the States and People
FalconThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Should there be a Law?
Half of the moderation for this is informative. This frightens me.