Slashdot Mirror


IE Flaw Exposes Users To Spoof-Based Attacks

Sotos wrote to mention a C|Net article discussing a new spoof-based attack on Internet Explorer. From the article: " The problem lies in the way Microsoft has implemented a JavaScript component in its Web browser, security researcher Amit Klein wrote in a research document. Internet Explorer does not validate some data fields provided by a PC when the component, called XmlHttpRequest, is used, he wrote. The vulnerability could be exploited with specially crafted code. An attacker could spoof a legitimate Web site, access data from the Web browser's cache or stage a so-called man-in-the-middle attack, which taps into traffic between a user and another Web site, according to Klein's write-up. " Secunia has an alert up on the spoof.

11 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. XMLHttpRequest? What's That? by turkeywrap · · Score: 5, Funny

    XMLHttpRequest? Never heard of it.

  2. Re:XMLHttpRequest? What's That? by pe1chl · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is the thingy that powers AJAX

  3. Dupe? by P0ldy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I wrong or haven't we seen this story before?

  4. Re:Crank Up The Flamethrowers by eggoeater · · Score: 5, Funny

    Than add another 100+ comments on your comments on how many comments we have and we'll have even more comments.....

    ...and then theres the comments on the comments on the comments....

    ...no...it will never end....especially after the dup story is posted tomorrow.

  5. Here come the pre-packaged sound bites. . . by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Yea, but it hasn't even been exploited yet! It doesn't count unless it's been exploited, right?"

    "I bet there will be a fix out within 24 hours! Exploits don't count if they are fixed quickly, right?"

    "I don't care if they find a thousand exploits; I still won't use IE!"


    Oh, wait . . . I thought the article was about another Firefox exploit. Nevermind.

  6. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firefox? I'm using Webwhale, which is much better!

  7. Let the IE/FF comparisons begin by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'll start with the securia site.

    Internet Explorer: Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.x with all vendor patches installed and all vendor workarounds applied, is currently affected by one or more Secunia advisories rated Highly critical...Currently, 20 out of 86 Secunia advisories, is marked as "Unpatched" in the Secunia database.

    FireFox: Mozilla Firefox 1.x with all vendor patches installed and all vendor workarounds applied, is currently affected by one or more Secunia advisories rated Less critical...Currently, 3 out of 24 Secunia advisories, is marked as "Unpatched" in the Secunia database.

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  8. Re:You gotta love this part by dajobi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's not security by obsurity. That's "at least give us a chance to fix it before you tell the crackers." The Mozilla guys tell exactly the same tale.

  9. Amateurs... by tktk · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just read the page source and render the pages in my head.

    There's no chance a spoof attack would ever wo.df&^3478adf@$%%

    /*User dead*/

  10. Re:XMLHttpRequest? What's That? by GweeDo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Active Ingredient: Triclosan
    Other Ingredients: Water, Magnesium and/or Sodium Dodecylbenzenesulfaonate, ammoniym laureth sulfate, Sodium xylenessulfonate, SD alcohol 3-A, Laurel polyglucose, Laurylamidoproptlamine oxide, Magnesium sulfate, Sodium bisulfate, fragrance, Prntasodium pentetate, DNDN Hydantoine, D&C Orange No 4.


    See, see, Triclosan is what powers AJAX!

  11. Re:You gotta love this part by SoccerManUNLV · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess you never read the story on ZDnet about a month ago, and MS was "looking into it". Apparently this does work and yet MS dropped the ball again, nothing knew, just expected sooner.