Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Tasked With Writing Law

Gamespot's Rumor Control column this week handles the usual spurious talk that swirls around the game news sites. One (sadly) factual rumour they report on details gamer-hunting lawyer Jack Thompson's new role as a lawmaker. From the article: "Repeatedly, Thompson has called for states to pass laws criminalizing the sale of M-for-Mature rated games to minors. Now it appears he may get the chance to pen such a law himself. In an e-mail sent out Thursday, Thompson says he has 'been asked by the Office of the Governor of the State of Florida, Jeb Bush, to draft and submit to him and to Florida legislators a bill that will prohibit the sale of violent and sexually explicit video games to minors.' ... When queried by GameSpot for more details, he would only say that he is the only person thus far who has been asked to submit a bill to the governor's office about M-rated game sales. He did not offer details about what kind of penalties the bill would prescribe for offenders or whether or not said penalties would be imposed solely on the clerks selling the games or also on the establishment selling the game and/or the game's publisher."

23 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Please, no by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If there is ANYTHING good and right in the world, please prevent this from happening. This guy is a freaking nut -- please do not let him do ANYTHING to censor video games.

    1. Re:Please, no by Meagermanx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let us consider two very important facts:
       
      1. We need a new supreme court justice.
      2. Jack isn't really doing anything. He's probably free.

  2. Worse than "M-Rated" by faloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It sounds like it has the potential to be ambiguous enough to include games that get rated "Teen." After all "violent" games can teens and it gets a little fuzzy. I doubt repurcusions would get all the way to game publishers though (except from companies not wanting to handle the liability of Mature games), after all Hollywood doesn't get dinged when someone underage makes it into a theater. Or when someone underage buys alcohol. But the tides do seem to be against game publishers these days, and some places are still trying to sue firearms manufacturers for stuff that third-parties do with their guns. Time'll tell, but I hope it falls flat.

    We are talking about the state that had Too Live Crew arrested though.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  3. Poor Florida by Morgalyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For some reason, I thought we might manage to make it out of this whole can of worms without ridiculous legislation, but I guess not. So far Jeb has done an OK job at balancing the right wing conservative fundamental religious nutcases in the Panhandle with the left wing liberal nutcases in the Wang, but this smacks of falling prey to letters from the west.

    I'm still not sure I understand why government entities feel like they need to step into a system that was sufficient for informing parents about the nature and content of media. The MPAA rates movies, the theaters sort-of enforce the rating requirements, but there are no real laws underlining any of it. The ESRB rates games, the vendors sort-of enforce the rating system, but apparently society as we know it is going to come crashing down if we don't impose some fines or jail sentences.

    How is legislation like this and the Michigan law going to affect online sales of games?

    --
    You say you got a real solution
    Well, you know
    We'd all love to see the plan
    (The Beatles)
    1. Re:Poor Florida by Morgalyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know, it is terrible. In the future perhaps I will skip my quick proof-reading step in order to avoid causing discomfort to the general /. reader. I recently realized my tendency to use good spelling and grammar might cause some distress. I apologize.

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
  4. Re:Whoosh by Sorce · · Score: 2, Funny

    you had respect for florida?

  5. Thanks...I'll be leaving the US now...it's over. by sgant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I give up. The religious idiots have won. I give up. I'm moving out of this theocracy and going to live somewhere else.

    Question though, what are my options? Where is a decent place to live without the christian assholes that want to run every ones lives? I've lived in this country for 43 years and even served in the military. Yet I've seen the christian morons take greater and greater control over my country. Especially when they've made it known that their top priority now is porn and videogames...no folks, not the terrorists or drug dealers or the other criminals. Porn and videogames are the true evil Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales has listed. He wants to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults. You know, just your basic humping and pumping. Next on the list will be videogames. I guess they've won the war on terror. They are saying porn is bad because it victimizes women. That they are the ones that are hurt through regular porn. So I suppose that gay porn between two men is ok with them?

    Yeah, I know, this is flamebait...troll...whatever. Mod me down, I don't care anymore. So again, goodbye America. I'm sick of your bullshit and I want out. Now, where to go?

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  6. Not Quite.. by \\ · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to this, Thompson is somewhat full of shit.

    "A representative of Jeb Bush's press office characterized as "untrue" yesterday's Jack Thompson press release in which the Miami attorney and self-described "anti-game crusader" claimed that he was crafting video game legislation on behalf of the Florida governor."

    More through the link.

  7. Re:Thanks...I'll be leaving the US now...it's over by Gurgeh15 · · Score: 3, Informative

    One word: Canada. Really, look into it. All of the perks of the U.S. without the nut jobs...

  8. Actually, if you took a mintue to do research..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You will know that the article is not completely up to date. Currently, Bush officials have denied that they asked Jack Thompson to write up video game legislation for them. Actually, blame should be put on GameStop for not researching this subject further, which is sad being that it is a highly visted videogame information site for many gamers.

  9. Re:Thanks...I'll be leaving the US now...it's over by Gherald · · Score: 3, Informative

    See you in Canada. All the benefits of living in a modern economy a hair's breath from the world's sole superpower; none of the drawbacks of living in a third world society. You even get to speak English!

    Just be sure to pack heavy, it's cold up here.

  10. Well... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I personally see no problem in restricting the sale of "adult" material to minors. Neither does the Supreme court.

    If the freakin' game lobby would get a clue and do what the movie industry did, and actually hype that angle up rather than being adamantly opposed to any fines for the sale of this material to minors, then maybe you wouldn't need to worry about Jack Thompson.

    A few "Gamestop fires employee for selling GTA w/o ID check" headlines would do it. But nooo...

    I also fail to see how restricting the sale of violent(and or/sexual) games to minors in any way infringes on the right to free speech as held by the SCOTUS, nor how it would:
    A. Keep the games out of the hands of minors whose parents allow them to play such things.
    B. Keep adults from playing these games.
    C. Keep these games from being made if the guys pushing for the legislation really DON'T have a point.

    If gamers don't give up the 12-yos should be allowed to go into Gamestop and buy a copy of Tentacle-fucker 3 - Revenge of the Overfiend(at the extreme end) angle with no fines for the store OR the guy that sold it then they're not going to get a voice in how the law is constructed and the chances it's going to be whacked out insane increase. Because it's GOING to happen.

    And there are upshots to it you probably can't even fathom.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    1. Re:Well... by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This doesn't need to be legislated. Community groups of concerned parents should work with the retailers to make sure that it is company policy to not sell M or AO rated games to minors. When you have a law to do this instead, it's censorship.

      Movie theaters voluntarily keep minors out of R-rated movies, sort of an unofficial social contract. It work pretty well, for the most part.. most kids can't see R-rated movies without a parent, and if one does, then maybe someone gets fired but nobody goes to jail or is fined. That's what we need for game stores. Not censorship. The rating system already in place is sufficient, in my opinion.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    2. Re:Well... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not censorship unless you dictate content. Children form exceptions to our various rights according to the SCOTUS. They can't drink, drive cars, smoke cigarettes, view pornography, wear what they want, say what they want, have sex with who they want, etc. No one is dictating content outside of the industry(yet). They're dictating what is appropriate for sale to a group of minors. And if you have a problem with that, you should also have a problem with kids NOT being able to buy pornography(at the minimum) because it's the same damn thing at it's heart.

      This isn't obscenity laws applying to adults here. We're not talking about the miller test here. So STFU about censorship, it doesn't help your case any.

      If you didn't know there wasn't a law regulating theater owners, you'd probably think that there was one.

      The games industry already has an MPAA equivalent(probably to the detriment of creativity), but retailers are obviously NOT doing their part. Because there is a perception that they are not. Fix the perception and you fix the problem.

      And that's not necessarily a good thing, judging by what's happened every time that's been done in the past.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  11. Why not books? by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is easily a hundred times more depravity, violence, and subversive thinking in books on a public library shelf than in any set of video games. Thank god we've already formed committees to review and rate these harmful works and prohibit minors from accessing th.... wait, what's that you say, any child can check out these seditious and violent works with nothing more than a library card? The works of the Marquis de Sade? Historical accounts of wars? Works of terror by Stephen King? What have we come to as a country if minors are allowed to view these materials unchecked? I demand that public libraries and librarians be fined and jailed for allowing such terrible influences to be given to our children!!

    Sarcasm aside, I demand that any legislator writing such a vigeogame law justify how that media can be treated differently than any other work. And interaction is not a valid defense, choose your own adventure books would meet that standard.

    I do agree some games are not suitable for minors, but just as the law doesn't jail or fine movie theaters if minors get into R-rated shows, there should be now such law punishing video game stores and clerks for essentially the same offense.

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Why not books? by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Funny
      The works of the Marquis de Sade? Historical accounts of wars? Works of terror by Stephen King?
      Something far worse... the Bible.
  12. Now I'm even more tempted to buy... by Turken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...one of those "I Hate Jack Thompson" T-shirts they're selling at ThinkGeek!

    Honestly, I'm proud to be one of the "Right-Wing-Bible-Thumping-Republican-Christian" wackos that the average Slashdotter loves to hate. But Jack has really been taking things too far the past few months.

  13. Clearing up a few gripes by Iriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In response to the complaints that I've been hearing about this subject like "Why not books?" "What about movies?" "Isn't this censorship?" and so on and so forth, I have this to say:

      - No, this isn't censorship because content is not being taken out. If the studios have to remove content to reach their audience, they'll find a way around regulations (they always do). Children aren't allowed to buy pornography and yet I hear no massive outcry about that. This is simply trying to keep excessively vulgar and violent games away from very young children.
      - Yes, youth violence is on a constant decline as it has been for the past several years, making all these "games raising you children to kill" arguments mostly idiodic.
      - Video games can be conceived of as more influential to children than books (I doubt it) and especially movies (easily so) as numerous studies suggest (keyword: suggest) that games are more powerful due to the level of interaction and feedback they require from the user.
      - Books are also not being targetted because anybody who looks at social trends can tell that literacy, or at least recreational reading in the US is on the decline. The numbers aren't large enough to get a response.

    But finally, games are being the scapegoat because the majority of the voting population in America doesn't understand games. By the time all those kids who were 6 or so when Nintendo first hit the US (people like me) become the major voting demographic, politicians will need to find a new target.

    --
    Perfecting Discordia
    www.stevenvansickle.com
  14. Can we stop paying attention to this freak? by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seriously. The only reason why this guy has political figures interested in him is because he's stirring people up.

    If we ignore him, he's no longer an interesting controversial figure and he loses pretty much all his power.

    Please, no more damn articles on this asshole.

    1. Re:Can we stop paying attention to this freak? by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We may know better than to pay him any heed, but those miserable, stupid peons who make up most of the world's population are another story. And that's why he's a danger.

      --
      Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
    2. Re:Can we stop paying attention to this freak? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if we ignore him. There is a large segment of the population which loves the idea that we're on the train to the land of Moral Decline, and the only thing that can save our nation is to ban "smut", reintroduce corporal punishment, and make the damned kids start calling people "sir" and "ma'am" again. These people vote, write letters to their representatives, and basically wield the sort of political influence that can only be generated by large crowds of idiots.

      If we ignore the idiots, they will not go away. They won't stop until they've invaded every home, blocked most of your cable channels, put a filter on your Internet, and passed laws allowing them to tell you to spit out our gum and stand up straight.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  15. Re:Thanks...I'll be leaving the US now...it's over by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

    All of the perks of the U.S. without the nut jobs.

    Canada is a nice country, but it has its own share of problems.

    I lived there for three years, and I noticed:

    - A LOT of petty micromanagement in the government. No country should spend tax dollars on governmental inspectors to ensure that restaurants are limited to a certain number of televisions, and that each of them must be below a maximum size. Or to arbitrarily decide that waitresses can wear a rollerskate on one foot, but not both. Two pieces of photo ID to buy liquor at the store, but only one from a bar? If you have two pieces of ID but your friend only has one, anything they were carrying can't be bought and you can only buy what you have in your hands?

    - Stupidly high taxes, probably due mostly to the last point.

    - A very conservative attitude re: appearances. I had long hair at the time, and I felt like I was back in the 50s because so many people thought I was a girl.

    - A much bigger problem with non-deadly crime, e.g. theft and home invasions. Related to this, the much more restrictive firearm laws, although obviously some people prefer it that way.

    - (related to the first point, but split out because this is a long rant) The incredibly annoying Canadian content laws for broadcasters. I had a show at my university's radio station, and there just aren't that many good Canadian industrial bands. Content should be about quality, not country of origin. A lot of the popular music in Canada is even worse than in the US (which is saying a lot) because the law requires radio stations and MuchMusic to play bands that are Canadian knockoffs of American pop bands (who are themselves third- or fourth-generation knockoffs of interesting music). I am looking at you, shitty band I can't remember the name of who tried to pull a Hendrix and turn the Canadian national anthem into a wailing guitar solo.

    On the other hand:

    - Socialized healthcare is good in many ways, although I think they should take the funding for the petty bureaucrats and use it to make sure people don't have to wait months for surgery.

    - University is actually affordable for citizens.

    I definitely have fond memories of it, but enough things got under my skin that I wouldn't live there again. That's kind of my dilemma - I feel similarly to the GP, but I don't know of any countries that would as a whole make me happier than the US.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  16. Re:Thanks...I'll be leaving the US now...it's over by sgant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It isn't about running away from anything. I've been fighting an uphill battle all those years. Everyone says "if you don't like things, then get out and vote". Well, I get out and vote. I try to get out and work in the community. I go to city council meetings. I am part of the school board. I write my congressman and Senator constantly almost to the point where I'm a nuisance. All to no avail.

    When I have to sit in on meetings about teaching intelligent design in our school system, I try to object that it's not even science at all I get people looking at me like I'm nuts. I even had a guy tell me to move to France as he said they're Godless over there too...to which he had a bit of applause from the group! It's a long story on that one, but you get my point I hope.

    So you say it's running away when things happen I don't like. Well, I suppose you would say that anyone that in the past has left an oppressive country and government were "running away when things happen" also? You seem to be one of these people that look down on people that bad-mouth their country...pathetic you call them. You even want to pass a law that if anyone says they want to leave the country would be deported in a month. And how dare I "cry" about it here. Sorry to muck up your perfect world order by my crying. I know you're just spouting off, but I'm not so sure that one day they would indeed pass this law...as our free speech that some still hold dear is eroding away year by year along with other freedoms...like the new bill about how the police would be able to take DNA samples from anyone detained. That's detained, not even arrested. Yes, this means that a minor traffic stop you "could" be required to give a DNA sample. More about this here.

    I'm tired. I just now want to live my life in peace and quiet now. This Jack Thompson thing is just another straw on a very over burdened camel.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith