Slashdot Mirror


Common Malware Enumeration Initiative

LogError writes "The Common Malware Enumeration Initiative was just announced. Headed by the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) and supported by an editorial board of anti-virus vendors and related organizations it should provide a neutral, shared identification method for malware outbreaks."

3 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Default Permit by lapagecp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just another example of getting entrenched in a default permit world which has proven itself time and again not to work. We need to be enumerating the good programs and not the other way around.

    1. Re:Default Permit by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've taken a good concept and turned it on its ear.

      Default Deny is good. Centralized lists of "good" software is bad. Think about it for a second and you'll realize why.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  2. Required reading by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the first time I've been to the US-CERT website, so please forgive my enthusiasm.

    This document on viruses should be required reading for anyone who uses a computer.

    http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/virus.html

    Most common malware can be stopped with the same virus-avoidance techniques listed in this brief document.

    As for this initiative, it's not explained very well, that's for sure. It seems like a simple naming convention for viruses as well as a central location for all virus information. I'm not big on the government taking away such a role from private industry, but with the threat of viruses affecting everyone, it makes sense that the government provide a baseline starting point for all antivirus companies to start from. It is not in the best interest of the public to have a single private company hoard virus information.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.