Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Grand Challenge Updates

Red Team writes "Today is the day. The official race route for the DARPA Grand Challenge was released to the first five teams at 4:00AM PST this morning. Our race planners are pouring over the race route getting ready for the launch. H1ghlander will start first at sunrise, around 6:15AM PST, followed by Stanford and then Sandstorm. For real-time updates on the race, you can track the Red Team race-day blog or catch the webcast on the official Grand Challenge page." Update: 10/08 20:57 GMT by Z : USSJoin writes "Stanford Racing, home of Stanley, has just finished the 131.2 mile DARPA Grand Challenge course. Considering that the CalTech Vehicle (Alice) jumped off the track toward onlookers only 8.3 miles in, this demolition derby-meets-AI demo has certainly been exciting."

9 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Popular Science has most recent updates by technoextreme · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.popsci.com/popsci/darpachallenge/1b7a1e 7eef0d6010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html Apparently, the teams all ready have traveled four times as far than last year. It is great progress for a year.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Popular Science has most recent updates by mroch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Found it, on the Grand Challenge home page: "Kurjanowicz also said that the course 'is tough, tougher than last year,' but added: 'The vehicles are better, smarter. That's why we held the NQE [National Qualification Event],' he said. 'We wanted to make sure they are capable of completing the course."

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. TGDaily.com also has a blog up by not5150 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.tgdaily.com/2005/10/08/darpagrandchalle nge2005/
    With pictures :)

    Most interesting one so far is when Caltech's Alice charged through a k-rail, knocking it over and then started up a berm towards reporters. It was E-Stopped just a few feet away from hitting the media.

  4. any of the contestants here? by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    During last years challenge all contestants were complaining that the thing was rigged in order to get the red team to win. I.e. there were last minute rule changes for which the red team was prepared for, but nobody else was, and some contestants said they had an operational system ready yet they were not allowed to compete.

    I am not at all surprised of this, since the red team is sponsored by the major military contractors and we all know how they basicaly control military procurement.

    But I was wondering if similar shenanigans were happening this time around. Any of the competitors care to comment?

    1. Re:any of the contestants here? by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As a team leader of one of the teams eliminated at the NQE, I didn't see any visible favoritism by the DARPA staff. The teams that went to Primm are the teams that should have gone.

      Funding is more of an issue. Teams were supposed to have no Government funding whatsoever, either direct or indirect. Yet MITRE had a team, and they're a quasi-governmental agency. CMU has received DARPA robotics contracts for years, as has Stanford. Red Whittaker of the CMU team is still the principal investigator on a NASA grant (#NAG5-12890) until February 2006. Stanford used software developed under DoD contract, although anyone can download it and they asked DARPA for permission. It's more of a revolving-door issue than direct diversion of Government funds.

      But the real incentive for the big university teams was fear. If Joe's Auto Parts fielded a better robot than some university getting $20 million a year in robotics funding from DARPA, DARPA might well pull the plug on the school. CMU faced that prospect; originally, they weren't going to enter the Grand Challenge at all. The whole Grand Challenge was created because of unhappiness at DARPA with the rate of progress in mobile robotics. DARPA has been pouring robotics money into CMU and Stanford for thirty years, without getting much back. The head of DARPA, Dr. Tony Tether, decided that it was time to do something about that. It worked.

  5. Re:We need a Google Maps Hacker by aerodyno · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's an Excel spreadsheet that displays that data and automatically updates every minute (it's a start)

    http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~savraj/gc-live.xls

  6. Wikipedia Article by KrackHouse · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm updating the Wikipedia page. Updates with links to videos plus google maps - add stuff if you've got it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_DARPA_Grand_Chal lenge

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  7. Re:We need a Google Maps Hacker by pooya · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kinda late, but here it is. Map is working: http://www.pooyak.com/utils/dgc2005/