Slashdot Mirror


300 Years to Index the World's Information

Kasracer writes "At the Association of National Advertisers annual conference, Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt suggested that it would take 300 years for them to index all of the world's information. From the article: 'We did a math exercise and the answer was 300 years,' Schmidt said in response to an audience question asking for a projection of how long the company's mission will take. 'The answer is it's going to be a very long time.'"

29 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Longer than expected by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought 42 years ought to be enough.

    1. Re:Longer than expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      64 years should be enough for anyone.

  2. 10,000,000 years by masterzora · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would this include indexing the Ultimate Question? Because last time I checked, that would take 10,000,000 years in and of itself.

    --
    Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    1. Re:10,000,000 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm thinking some people wouldn't want their penis lengths stored in some great vault of information.

      Particularly the women, but I could be wrong.

    2. Re:10,000,000 years by eonlabs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, check it out! I'm in the lead!!!! ^_^

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  3. New hardware needed by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The hardest part will be developing the hardware that is able to recursively index the Google data itself an infinite number of times.

    1. Re:New hardware needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    2. Re:New hardware needed by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's OK, they use linux. It does infinite loops in 5 seconds.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
  4. 300 years? by RonnyJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    300 years? I'd have thought their other plan would have been a lot quicker.

  5. I'd like my house indexed by obli · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until Google decides that your house is information? Just imagine an army of small robot spiders invading your home every night, registering the position, name and contents of every single object you own, making it searchable from house.google.com. Unless you nail a robots.txt to your front door, that is...

    1. Re:I'd like my house indexed by jacksonj04 · · Score: 5, Funny

      locate:keys | pocket
      locate:phone | pocket
      locate:underwear -girlfriend | rm

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:I'd like my house indexed by WilliamSChips · · Score: 3, Funny
      locate: girlfriend: no such thing for a slashdotter
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  6. Carnac the Magnificent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    *holds envelope to his head*

    "42"

    *opens envelope and reads*

    "What is the number of duplicate posts that will say 'I thought it was 42'."

  7. Everybody! by Slashdiddly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please stop creating new information and let Google catch up! You can resume later.

  8. Yeah right.. by Klowner · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's going to take them a hell of a lot longer than that, considering my car keys are always moving.

  9. When I read the summary by colonslashslash · · Score: 5, Funny
    I immediately thought of the Futurama episode - The Why of Fry - where the giant brains build the brainsphere and assimilate all the knowledge in existance, before attempting to destroy the entire universe so no new information can be added.

    Googlesphere anyone?

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  10. 300 Years? Feed Those Pigeons! by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously they're not feeding those pigeons enough. Time to buy some quality feeds Google. Maybe even slip in some uppers every now and then. If all else fails, maybe it's time to consider the parrot upgrade. They're a lot more expensive but their index/poop ratio is much better.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  11. I Call Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's going to take 300 years to index the grammer and spelling mistakes on Slashdot alone.

  12. Re:I'm curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The blogs of thirteen-year-old girls are examples of the recently discovered negative information. If more young girls can be encouraged to write this will actually reduce Google's workload.

  13. Re:And the Winner is... by Fermatprime · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it's just Zeno's paradox. Let's say it takes them 300 years to index all today's information, then another 150 to index all the new infomation, then another 75... By 2605, all information to that point will have been indexed by Google. Then they can start indexing the FUTURE.

    --
    I hate the one hundred and twenty character limit for signatures with an all-enveloping, all-destroying, incredible pass
  14. Re:i hereby propose by b100dian · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Google indexed it all in 6 days, and took a rest in the 7th...

    --
    gtkaml.org
  15. from a logical point of view by ronsta · · Score: 2, Funny
    Please correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't solving a problem like this create more information than you previously had? And wouldn't you have to index that information and so on and so forth?

    Also, can someone explain to me how you even approach something like this from a mathematical model point of view? How did the 170 terrabyte number even come up? Aren't there different definitions for what constitutes 'information?' Also, who the hell spent their 20% on this problem when there was integral code for vital programs to write, such as Google Suggest and Google Suggest in Japanese?

    PLEASE, SOMEONE EXPLAIN BEFORE I GO OFF INTO MORE OF A FLAMEBAIT RANT!

  16. Re:The major question is by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, though, why would anyone want to index all the info in the world? That's kinda weird, in my opinion.

    New here?

    --
    Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  17. Uh oh by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh oh...someone needs to visit Applied Cryogenics and knock 700 years off Fry's timer then.

  18. Re:The major question is by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 3, Funny
  19. MOD PARENT DOWN -- BASHING GOOGLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is your psudo-mod-bitchslap-sarcastic reply right here.

    --Anonymize me up Scotty!--

  20. I thought the answer was 42. by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ask a stupid question...

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  21. Indexing the Porn by ozTravman · · Score: 2, Funny

    He didn't clarify that 299 years of that was indexing all the Internet porn sites.

  22. Re:Oooo.... No it's the giant brains all over agai by jrockway · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry, I just ordered a pizza for I. C. Wiener.

    --
    My other car is first.