Slashdot Mirror


IBM Vows Not to Genetically Discriminate

An anonymous reader writes "Today the New York Times is reporting that IBM announced the addition of genetic makeup (Genetic Registration Required) to its non-discrimination policy. It appears that IBM is the first company worldwide to do this. With congress considering genetic privacy legislation, and with projects like the National Geographic Genographic Project, are we nearing the time when we all need to worry about our genetic privacy?"

15 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. however... by Brunellus · · Score: 4, Funny

    they reaffirmed their commitment to constantly split infinitives...

    1. Re:however... by cerelib · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope that you realize that "to constantly split" is a split infinitive.

    2. Re:however... by CapnGrunge · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unobligatory fortune reference:

      William Safire's Rules for Writers:
                      Remember to never split an infinitive. The passive voice
      should never be used. Do not put statements in the negative form.
      Verbs have to agree with their subjects. Proofread carefully to see if
      you words out. If you reread your work, you can find on rereading a
      great deal of repetition can be avoided by rereading and editing. A
      writer must not shift your point of view. And don't start a sentence
      with a conjunction. (Remember, too, a preposition is a terrible word
      to end a sentence with.) Don't overuse exclamation marks!! Place
      pronouns as close as possible, especially in long sentences, as of 10
      or more words, to their antecedents. Writing carefully, dangling
      participles must be avoided. If any word is improper at the end of a
      sentence, a linking verb is. Take the bull by the hand and avoid
      mixing metaphors. Avoid trendy locutions that sound flaky. Everyone
      should be careful to use a singular pronoun with singular nouns in
      their writing. Always pick on the correct idiom. The adverb always
      follows the verb. Last but not least, avoid cliches like the plague;
      seek viable alternatives.

      --
      I see 57005 people
  2. Huh? by sdirrim · · Score: 5, Funny

    How would someone be discriminated against based on Genetic Material?

    Sorry, but you have a AGGTAGTGCACA sequence. We can't hire you.

    --
    Not only "land of the free" but "land of the lawyers" who love a good old 1st amendment smackdown. Shihar 153932
    1. Re:Huh? by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 2, Funny

      How would someone be discriminated against based on Genetic Material?

      Sadly it happens all the time. Where I work we won't even consider job applications by tomato plants despite the fact that the only differences between them and human employees arise from their genetics.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
  3. Good news! by nurhussein · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well that's good news for those of us who were born with a genetic anomaly that gives us a superhealing factor and retractable claws! We'll have no problems applying for work at IBM!

    *snikt!*

  4. Hmmm... by Musteval · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm only stupid because of genetic makeup! IBM, hire me or I'll sue you for genetic discrimination!

    --
    Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm only stupid because of genetic makeup! IBM, hire me or I'll sue you for genetic discrimination!

      I'm sure they have a manager position on the OS/2 new markets division.

  5. See, we don't need government regulation by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's a shining example. IBM has stepped up to the plate in the non-discrimination game. I say that we should table all legislation on genetic discrimination, and let the corporations police themselves. We know that they will all do the right thing. Those that don't will be judged in the marketplace for their decisions. The strong will prevail and the weak disappear. It's a win-win for everyone, and avoids needless government regulation where it can only be a hindrance to our economy.

    Besides, there's no need for government interference, unless you have something genetic you need to hide, right? :-)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. Mutants still need to register by MECC · · Score: 3, Funny


    But won't be discrimitated against...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  7. What Gets Between Me and My Genes? Nothing. by kurosawdust · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one am in favor of this law, as it allows me to finally realize my childhood dream of being a billionaire scientist astronaut who plays for the NBA.

  8. Re:This will be tested by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What does a company do when a gene is found that causes a 100% chance of the individual being sociopathic?"

    Give them a reality TV show?

  9. Geriatric Discrimination by Genady · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read the article head as the above and thought, hey cool, IBM's not gonna be axing my old mainframer friends (yes a UNIX admin can have tn3270 friends). Imagine my surprise. Well, here's hopin' they'll eventually get around to helping the boomers keep their jobs.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  10. You know what they say... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We don't need genetic privacy. If your genes aren't doing anything wrong, then you have nothing to hide, right?

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  11. Will not discriminate, but it will harass you by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Big Blue finds out you are genetically defective and a possible future health liability, it triggers its Harass 2.0 application to run.
    Harass 2.0 will then make your work a living hell by randomly erasing your computer's data, adding files with inappropriate material, and spam you incessantly into finally making you quit your job. Benefits are then terminated, problem solved.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson