20 Lawmakers Want to Kill Your Television
Macki writes "As previously mentioned, the Broadcast Flag is back before congress. There are 20 law makers currently supporting the bill. The insane thing about it is the fact that no one supports the bill except a handful of entertainment companies. Probably not even the employees of the entertainment companies. It's bad enough they want to break our televisions, but the way that they are subverting democracy is just astounding. Danny O'Brien at the EFF has done a spectacular job deconstructingthe MPAA/RIAA's efforts to ramrod this through, and more importantly, the motivations of the members of congress who are helping them."
This won't contribute a thing to this discussion.
In fact, it's a knee jerk response on my part. I admit it.
But, I gotta say it.
What a bunch of Jerks!
Thank you!
Star Pirates
Sure, well there is.. umm.. oh but there is.. well um.. no. I cannot think of anyone on the planet who does not have some agenda. Including me. (see my sig line!)
Cogito Ergo Sum
It's ironic that you would equate the the Great Emancipation with abortion, seeing as how the spirit of the latter is the opposite of the former (that is, treating someone as something less than a person).
Not necessarily. If you happen to not believe that abortion is always murder, there is no ironic juxtaposition here: the legalisation of abortion represents a crucial moment for the emancipation of women, just as the Great Emancipation was a crucial moment for the emancipation of black slaves.
my guitar wants to kill your mama.
27 years without tv. Just don't put a broadcast
flag on my sewing machines. www.clearplastic.com
Cleara
Of all the scumbags in the Senate, you picked Barbara Boxer to parody as hypocritical? How about Bill Frist (R-TN), the Senate Majority Leader (ie. "in charge of the Senate")? Frist is about to be indicted for insider trading $millions of his family's healthcare stock, as part of his preparation to run for president in 2008. All while forcing rulebreaking votes to pump $BILLIONS of corporate welfare into drug companies, inefficient anticonsumer "privatized" healthcare, and many other votes and party decrees that block cost effective healthcare development and consumption. In other words, robbing us to keep us sick, then dumping his own shares when even those scams couldn't prop up his family business. All while violating a "blind trust" that's supposed to prevent his even knowing which shares he owns, let alone direct his conflicted interests to make a fortune off our misfortune. And Frist is just the biggest kingpin - he's not even the biggest scumbag.
So you pick on Boxer. I'm calling you out as a fox in the henhouse, wearing chicken feathers and crowing a chicken alarm to lock you in with your prey.
--
make install -not war
The trouble with your argument is that babies are aborted at all stages of fetal development. The zygote implants in the mother's uterus about one week after conception. The growing child becomes is a fully-formed embryo by the end of the first month. This child is growing and will continue to grow unless something goes wrong, or someone interferes.
www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
See Subject