Slashdot Mirror


180 Solutions Cuts Back on Spyware Installs

An anonymous reader writes "Washingtonpost.com is reporting that adware purveyor 180Solutions has finally decided to stop letting third-party companies install their programs for commission without 180's approval. The story says 180 announced the move after pressure from public interest groups who threatened to file a formal complaint with regulators at the Federal Trade Commission."

20 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Please by temojen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File anyways.

    1. Re:Please by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      well technically, they don't provide spyware. They provide adware. There's a difference, not that anyone really cares. They both suck just as bad too me.

  2. Somehow I doubt getting approval will be very hard by Clockwurk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What good is peddling scumware if you can't get ppl to bundle it?

  3. Better Ideas by Scoria · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, I've noticed that spyware developers only tend to change once they've developed a "better" idea, and rumor has it that a couple of original equipment manufacturers are now installing MyWebSearch by default.

    Could it be that some spyware manufacturers are taking the good press while they can, knowing that their current method of installation won't really last? Could they be looking to bypass end-user installation altogether?

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:Better Ideas by Cylix · · Score: 3, Informative

      While it's too late now.

      I'm fairly certain that low end Dell's now ship with it. They have a lot of stuff installed... even Office trial that can be purchased. I'm not sure, but I think WP was the full version, but only included on CD.

      So yeah, that might explain the price break on the new equipment and boy does it slow them down. So of course I wipe and reinstall... then create an image disk for all of the systems.

      Unfortunately, I can't go back and confirm it on the dozen new systems, because they no longer have the factory install.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  4. They Should be in Jail by PingXao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they get to continue pushing their crap and the only difference is that the CSO - Chief Sleaze Officer - must personally approve every payload turd. Fantastic. They need to be shut down, not threatened with a slap on the wrist.

  5. Bad for digiticians! by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey, I'm as glad as the next guy to kick spyware writers in the teeth, but we the slashdot readers are a group most densely than any other made up of people who are paid good cash money (sometimes sex!) to clean this crap out of people's computers. Just as Microsoft is capitalizing like a mafia on protection from viruses for money, a market created from writing crappy operating systems, we the slashdot lobby should push for "free speech" rights of the malware industry.

    1. Re:Bad for digiticians! by Supurcell · · Score: 5, Funny
      Fixing computers for sex! Where the hell are you fixing computers? A porno set?
      "I got a call that someone had a problem with their computer."
      "I called. I don't think this big, floppy disk will fit in my tiny drive."
      "Don't worry, I'll make it fit. Looks like you have some backdoors on here too."
  6. Why threaten anything? by Evro · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The story says 180 announced the move after pressure from public interest groups who threatened to file a formal complaint with regulators at the Federal Trade Commission."


    Why bother threatening anything? Why not just file the complaint?
    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Why threaten anything? by LePrince · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Because when getting in front of the judge, you can say that you did everything you could outside of the courtroom to prevent this to getting to a courtoom, and failed because the other company refused to comply.

      Otherwise you might end up in court, screaming, then when the defending party comes in, they will say "Oh, that's why I'm here ? Well, yeah, sure, why not, I don't mind, I'll do it". Then you look like a complete asshat who didn't want to resort to something OTHER than the court...

      One of my friend is sueing someone for fraud (2000$) and as the policeman said, "Do everything you can (legally of course) to recover the cash. If talking doesn't work, THEN we'll file in a legal criminal complaint and it'll go to court. Because if you go to court and she simply agrees to pay, you look like the dumbass.

  7. Too little... by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...so horribly, horribly late. Do these impotent bastards actually think this is going to make people *want* to use their software, or are they just trying for some positive PR spin? I can think of a lot of other ways clients have gotten 180Solutions' junk on their machines, and IST was only the most voracious. Let's not forget this has been going on for a few years now, too. Did they never see ISTbar installed on their own machines? That would be kinda funny, now that I think on it.

    --
    Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    1. Re:Too little... by rholliday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It can work. Remember that we're dealing with the general public here. We as technicians know spyware companies' names by heart because we deal with them hand's-on. The end user just knows "it was slow and had popups" and we subsequently "fixed it."

      Example: eAnthology/eAcceleration/Stop Sign, etc. I remember removing tons of their spyware apps. Now they advertise on national television for their Anti-Virus packages, claiming to "make it faster than the day you got it." Did they clean up their act? I have no idea, frankly. But I know people are buying it.

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
  8. Let this company die by bhav2007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comanies like this make my blood boil. I am planning to be a CS major in college, and I just can't understand how anyone could willingly work to make this kind of product. Have they actually fooled themselves into believing that one of their toolbars is helping people? I couldn't. It flattens me that someone could go on working to create something which is completely useless and harmful. I can only conclude that whoever is working at these companies must either be starvingly desperate for work or just hateful. Maybe that is where bad programmers go when they die. "Welcome to hell, now you will be forced to create spyware for all of eternity! Mwahahahahaha!". Also, why exactly should we care if this company is "turning around"? There are plenty of struggling software companies which haven't infected anyone. It seems pretty much impossible that one of these establishments could ever produce something useful. Do programmers have any kind of vigilante justice? ;)

  9. re: free speech for malware authors? by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a crappy attitude! You're comment makes you look like an embarassment to I.T. I do get paid good money to clean up spyware/malware problems as part of my job. I do on-site PC service and consulting for a living. But like I tell lots of customers, I'd *much* rather being doing something else for my money. Frankly, it's boring, and sometimes even tedious work. Here you are, on the clock, waiting for several scanners to go through every single file and folder on their hard drives - and in some cases, doing a bunch of manual registry editing and searching too. Hours can easily go by, especially when the customer has a slower computer, and you're just praying the machine doesn't decide to freeze up in the middle of one of these scans, or else you've got to start it over from the beginning again! Meanwhile, you're starting to wonder how you're going to justify billing the person for all this time that's going by - when charging your normal hourly rate is starting to mean charging more than their system is even worth!

    Just as I have no desire to join the mafia and extort money from people, I don't enjoy billing high rates to customers who were victimized by malware when all they're trying to do is struggle by on their 5 or 6 year old PC, reading their email and typing up papers.

    In fact, I've often ended up trying to "do the right thing" and only charging them a more reasonable price, which meant I got seriously short-changed for my time spent. But I guess I just can't stomach the idea of taking some retired lady's entire pension for the month just because some asshat like 180 Solutions tossed their crap-ware on her computer when she thought she was just downloading a pretty waterfall screen saver or something.

  10. Re: free speech for malware authors? by RM6f9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Try a KVM switch - thanks to them, it's entirely possible to be cleaning 8 computers at a time - charge each owner 1 hour's labor, lather, rinse, repeat as necessary. Housecalls extra, of course, but with the right scheduling, you can stay as busy as you want, and not feel as much guilt over your charges.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  11. Re:Spyware vs. Adware by entrigant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just call them all Malware. That seems pretty accurate to me. I don't care if it only shows ads if it installed itself as a damn driver or hooked the kernel it "Does bad things to your system/configuration."

  12. 180's nonconsensual installations -- video proof by bedelman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, this is the same 180solutions whose software has been so frequently observed to become installed through security exploits.

    Most recently -- just last week! -- I posted video proof showing 180 installing even after users specifically decline and refuse 180. Details.

    Too little too late, indeed!

  13. makes sense now by fearanddread · · Score: 4, Informative
    Makes more sense when you see the update at the bottom of the article:

    "UPDATE, 5:44 p.m. ET: Spyware researcher Eric Howes points out that it is perhaps clearer to say that 180 will no longer allow third parties to install its software unless the method of install is first approved by 180. More specifically, the company will no longer let third-parties install its software via "ActiveX," a component included in Internet Explorer that spyware purveyors commonly abuse to install their wares with little or no interaction on the part of the user."

  14. Isn't this rather like... by sanx · · Score: 4, Funny
    180 Solutions to cut down on spyware installs

    Isn't this rather like promising you'll only beat your wife once a week from now on?

  15. No, thanks by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See, even without going into what's morally wrong with that attitude (it's been said already anyway), it's a piss-poor use of my time anyway.

    1. It's not the job I wanted to do. If I wanted to clean up crap, I'd be a janitor. I'm a programmer. There's a difference. I'd rather spend my time coding or playing a game, than searching through someone's registry for crap

    (The same goes, btw, for crap like "I bought an ancient scanner at a flea market. Can you please make it work?" Then it turns out it's an ancient SCSI model from back in the DOS times, that nowadays the manufacturer doesn't even admit ever having sold.)

    2. How much _do_ you get paid for it anyway? If I were to charge someone, say, my consultant fee for that time (as an arbitrary measure of my time's worth: that's how much I'd get paid at work for that time), chances are they could just buy a new computer, including OS, for that money.

    In practice most people I know get paid some token price, if at all. Even on /. pretty much _the_ standard post about it is along the lines of "yay, I got a pizza for fixing their computer". Or a beer, or a homecooked meal, or whatever. I'm sorry, unless you're a teenager without an allowance or living on a 1-2$ per hour wage in East Elbonia, that doesn't even start to be adequate compensation. Taking a part time job at McDonalds would likely pay more money per hour than that.

    And let's go back to the "if at all" part. What most people seem to want isn't to pay a professional to have their computer serviced, but to mooch some free repairs off a nerd who (in their opinion) had nothing better to do with his time anyway. Asking for money, more often than not won't get you paid, it will just get them offended. (Though on the bright side, sometimes they're offended enough to stop asking for free tech support.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.