Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo and Microsoft to Merge Instant Messengers

Primotech writes "Betanews has word that Microsoft and Yahoo plan to link their respective IM clients again so that users of both can communicate with each other on one, shared network. Facing threats from third-party applications, like Trillian and Skype, the two tech giants will claim 44% of the instant messaging market, analysts predict. They will also go head to head together with the biggest competitor, AOL."

9 of 424 comments (clear)

  1. Trillian? by USSJoin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trillian isn't its own protocol, of course. This is what is somewhat odd about the article: it can't decide whether it's talking about the networks (MSN and YIM combining protocols and having interoperability) or whether they're jointly developing a multi-protocol client (like Trillian, although Trillian does a lot more than just those two).

    1. Re:Trillian? by labratuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the choice of skins and what not, what a relief. For me the MSN interface has just become this weirdly bloated thing.

      This line is full of hilarious irony.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  2. Common enemy by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More than Trillian, Skype and others, i bet that they are more against their common foe, Google/Gmail/GTalk/etc. Maybe against each separate component they can have a chance, but when you start to combine them the potential for growing and taking away their markets is probably too big.

  3. Seems pretty obvious by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There isn't much money to be made in instant messengers. Maybe a little revenue from advertising in the window corners, maybe a few bucks from premium games, but in all it's mostly a net loss. And you also have the problem that your users may be drawn away from your IM client to another one because of an established group of friends with the other one.

    Bringing these two IM clients into compatibility isn't a way to make a stronger IM network, but rather to eliminate the drain that both companies must be feeling. It also helps that it marginalizes AIM and its premium services, which benefits both Yahoo and Microsoft.

    I always thought Microsoft would get around to doing this one day. It just seemed the logical next step. Hopefully their next next step will be the ability to have different statuses for specific people in your contact list, and be able to contact people even though you appear offline. Back in the day (get off my lawn, you crazy kids) ICQ had this feature, but since ICQ has been dragged down into a hole by AOL, it's been on my IM wishlist.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
  4. blah... by evil_marty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is gonna put alot of pressure on Google and Jabber. I mean Google just entered the market, with MSN and Yahoo and Possibly AIM, there wont be a need for a new contender. I dont think its bad coz that will bring more ppl close together and save installed 100s of IM apps just to talk to all your friends. I do wonder how they will connect them all and whether you will use screennames or e-mail address or whatever.

  5. Apps like Trillian... by GiorgioG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    make this type of stuff completely irrelevent for techies anyway.

    I own a copy of Trillian 3.1 Pro and I can say that it's the best thing since sliced bread ;-)

  6. Re:One Word Gaim by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    its all Transparent to me cause i use Gaim

    But, it's not.

    Going to Yahoo!, creating an account, dealing with their spam emails and offers all the time in the future and then logging into Yahoo! with that special Yahoo! account is not transparent whatsoever. And not enough people use Yahoo! to justify creating a special account just to talk to them.

    Yahoo! probably realized this and gave up the ship.

  7. Re:I find that amusing... by Baricom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    -1 The End of Yahoo as we Know It

    I happen to think that Yahoo! is doing some amazing, cool stuff - cool enough to be a major Google competitor. I like it that way, because in my opinion, neither company has a definitive edge, and they keep trying to out-innovate each other because of it. That's an incredibly good thing.

    Yahoo! was the first Google - the site that strived to sort the web so mere mortals could get around. I first used it when it was http://akebono.stanford.edu/. The day it gets bought by Microsoft will be a sad day, indeed.

  8. Re:Even Further Proof of... by carlivar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please explain:

    -Why Yahoo's search "sucks". Please give examples of a specific Google search outperforming Yahoo.

    -Why Google maps won't print right.

    -Why Yahoo has traffic on their maps when Google apparently invents every new feature on the Internet.

    --
    Vote Libertarian