Slashdot Mirror


FBI Raids Home of Spam King Alan Ralsky

wstearns writes "The Detroit News is reporting that the FBI has raided Alan Ralsky's home. In the raid, the FBI took computers and financial records, effectively shutting him down. Mr. Ralsky has been frequently covered here."

14 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. Charged with what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Last time I checked, it was legal to e-mail someone you don't know.

    1. Re:Charged with what? by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Spam is awful, but 20 years in prison for it is just absurd.
      Oh, I agree. If I send a spam to someone, I should only have to spend a day in jail. Maybe even just an hour. Half an hour? Oh, whatever. And if I expect this reasonably light sentence for myself committing the mostly harmless (but nevertheless malicious and fraudulent) crime of spamming a fellow human being, then it's only fair for this guy to get a fair sentence likewise.

      So let's only imprison him for one hour..

      ..per victim.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Charged with what? by Random832 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about we imprison him for one half second, the time it takes to hit delete ...per message

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  2. Too bad... (deprived of property w/o due process) by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously -- whether you like Ralsky or not, this practice of seizing computer equipment is probably unconstitutional. He is being deprived of his property and his ability to make a living, without due process of law. According to TFA, all of his computer were seized, shutting him down.

      We may object to Ralsky's nefarious tactics, but the point is that SourceForge could in principle be next.

  3. Call your FBI and say thanks! by azav · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just phoned the Detroit office of the FBI who raided Ralsky's home at (313) 965-2323 and told the responding agent that I was so unbelievably happy that their office raided Alan Ralsky.

    The agent was amazed and replied "uh thank you. We don't get calls like this very often."

    OMG. Wow.

    This is an excellent opportunity to show your support that we STRONGLY support their action and efforts!

    If they know their is huge public support for this, that may help them to shut down more of these spammers!

    This is AWESOME!

    Just call and say thanks and this will keep things moving in the right direction.

    w00t!

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Call your FBI and say thanks! by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Just call and say thanks and this will keep things moving in the right direction."

      Why do you want to spam FBI with useless phone calls? I agree that people have to express what they thing, but this is ridiculous, just imagine the poor guys over there responding to the avalanche of phone calls...

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:Call your FBI and say thanks! by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I couldn't care less. I hardly get any spam at all. I use spamassassin on my server and junkmatcher on my client. I'm sure I won't notice a difference at all with this douche.

      How much resources do spamassassin and junkmatcher take up? If the answer is anything other than, "Literally 0 percent, and they came pre-installed and pre-configured", you should be happy.

  4. as a relatively new member of slashdot,... by iLogiK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i would just like to say:
    You did WHAT???

    i haven't had the time to read the comments so this joke has probably been already said, but:
    you've slashdoted him via snail mail :)

  5. Anything to do with control of the Internet battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... don't you think it's kinda strange that the worlds number one spam arsehole is arrested just days before important discussions concerning the future of the Internet are held particularly when a number of countries have expressed serious concerns at the lack of aciton against SPAM + PORN?

    Brazil: "For those that are still wondering what Triple-X means, let's be specific, Mr. Chairman. They are talking about pornography. These are things that go very deep in our values in many of our countries."

    Syria: "There's more and more spam every day. Who are the victims? Developing and least-developed countries, too. There is no serious intention to stop this spam by those who are the transporters of the spam, because they benefit...The only solution is for us to buy equipment from the countries which send this spam in order to deal with spam. However, this, we believe, is not acceptable.

    Find more comments here

    P.S thank you to the posters of this insightful post and this one.

    P.P.S Just a personal message to Alan: Hope you die in prison you scum sucking lazy obese cocksucker.

  6. Re:Stop the buyers not the spammers. by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's a rather tired cliche, and rather corporate too. It's the little guy's fault, of course, for being human. Not every country in the world is soft on spam and allows torrents of it, unlike the USA and a few others. A equally effective remedy is to put enforcement in place that makes the spammer realize that he has a high risk of being caught and if caught will get the book thrown at him. It's not as if we don't know who a lot of these people are, and in many cases we've known who they are for years. The issue is just as much to do with political will as anything else. Indeed a foreign observer might wonder whether some of the spam kings enjoy political protection (in the Russian Federation, SE Asia and elsewhere, as well as the US), since so many apparently operate with impunity.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  7. Re:Waste of tax dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    he causes economic damage to the nation.

    By that token you could go after many companies. You could argue Microsoft causes economic damage by failing to properly secure its software which results in companies losing millions in lost productivity.

    People should have a right to contact anybody anytime about anything. How much spam have you had from this one guy? I mean if someone is diliberately filling your inbox with junk I agree with you. But spam is a distributed problem. And don't give me this deterent-crap. Locking people up for spam is like locking people up for drugs and will have little affect in the long run. In the end, it's up to individuals to take responsibility not big brother.

  8. This is good news but we need *MORE* enforcement by merc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Alan Ralsky is one of the most egregious and pernicious of the spam scum out there. He tops the ROKSO (Registry of Known Spam Offenders) lists and is responsible for a very large volume of spam originating from APNIC netspace. Much of his spam hosting is overseas and he regularly emits spam by relaying it through zombied systems open relays or proxies. As you will see from the article some of his own state's anti-spam legislation were actually created with him solely in mind.

    I can only hope we see more of this in kind, especially Waggoner, Marin, Scelson, Lin, Martino and ESPECIALLY Soloway who, like Ralsky, has always been quite the unapologetic spammer.

    As an earlier poster said, thank you to the FBI for their hard work, and also for starting to take this problem seriously.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  9. Re:One down, thousands more to go. by jhalme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last year, the Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority ("Ficora") issued an order to all finnish ISPs, stating that they should block all outgoing connections to port 25, barring the ISP's own SMTP server, from any privately used internet connections. This very effectively blocks any zombie machines from sending out junk email directly to MX servers.

    One drawback is, however, that I have to change the outgoing SMTP server whenever I take my laptop from home to work and vice-versa.