Slashdot Mirror
New Hopes From Sun's Idea Factory
UltimaGuy writes "While it's way too soon to say Sun is back on track, the return of Bechtolsheim, aggressive improvements in products and a healthy dose of humility among Sun's executives mean the troubled company and its investors have more cause for optimism than they've had in years." Of course, Sun's problems are still out there - dealing with projects like Geronimo for some of their base infrastructure, and of course other companies promoting Linux as the solution.
What determines when a company is "Back On Track"? In my opinion Sun was doing things right months ago... yet if you look at their stock (what really matters to a company) you'd never know it!
LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
You thought wrong. It's very clear to anyone with any knowledge of the subject that they offer much more than just hardware. I'm not quite sure why you feel that a company needs to be a "hardware" company or a "software" company as plenty of companies can do both...
"A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
Don't forget: they're also supporting Windows on their x86 hardware.
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
Really? The HUGE amount of Sun servers I've seen in Corp. Data Centers don't count? If the DoD props up anyone it is Silicon Graphics. Talk about proprietary everything.
I'm a long time Sun user from sparc1 thru my current F15s, and I think its over. Sun is starting the long decline so familiar to the workstation vendors. Think HP PA-RISC and SGI. Basically, I bought SUN to stay 5 years ahead of the PC technology curve.
Sadly, Sun could not maintain the technology lead and as they move to x86 servers, the argument that low cost x86 systems are 90% as good for half the price starts to be felt. I pay a premium to be ahead of the curve.
OSS is going to canibalize Sun on the software side unless they become a services and integration company of OSS stacks.
As a developer I find the complete opposite. I would much rather work with Solaris (or BSD) in a server environment than any other OS. I've had no problems finding binary versions of any packages and even if I did it's not like compiling from source is a problem.... Dependency problems happen no where near as often as they do in Linux and generally they can be resolved very easily if you know what you're doing. As to your admins blindly installing Sun updates, this speaks more about the quality of your admins than it says anything about Sun. No updates for any OS are perfect especially when you're admins just "blindly install" them.
It's interesting how you didn't touch on any of the good aspects of Solaris that can't be found in any other OS. Perhaps, if you look at some of the internals of Solaris you would see why the DoD is using it.
"A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
Great, we'll just lose some more operating system and (especially) platform diversity. OpenSolaris is the best thing that can happen to Solaris, and I would like to see more competition between Solaris, Linux, and BSD (because competition leads to more innovation between the three OSes). There are many nice things and advantages to the Solaris platform that Linux could learn from. Besides, Solaris is a real Unix (based off AT&T Unix System V), whereas Linux is just a clone. Why would Sun drop something based on the real thing for an imitation? If Sun were to drop anything, I'd rather Sun adopt Plan 9 rather than Linux. At least Plan 9 is unique and different.
And with the SPARC platform, why would Sun drop that elegant platform for the inferior x86-64 architecture? (Don't get me wrong, I like the AMD64 a lot, but it is still based on that hideous x86 architecture, and the SPARC is much better designed). Over the past few years, we have lost a few well-designed platforms (Alpha, PA-RISC, PowerPC) to the x86, and the SPARC is the last holdout. I do not want to see an x86 monopoly on computing, but it looks like were heading for that. And when we're stuck with the x86 as our only platform, then innovation will slow down, and we might not see better platforms again.
Sun should continue what it has been doing; be a Unix company selling a Unix variant and workstations, and promoting Java (let's not forget that important part of Sun). We don't need another Linux PC manufacturer. If Sun degenerated to just selling Linux PCs, then Sun would die faster than you can say a BSD or Apple troll.
DoD probably orders servers without video cards, cd/dvd drives on purpose. There are some DoD sites which have server manfactureres metal epoxy all of the USB/Firewire ports on their servers before they are even let into the datacenter. It may well be part of their security best practices.
"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
Your solution, however, would end up positioning them as yet another Linux X86 harware integrator in a commodity market, with little or no competitive advantage. And as much as Linux would like to think it's up to Solaris standards... it's not.
Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
Solaris could do anything and everything that Linux could do. Why would Sun switch from Solaris to Linux if Solaris can do everything that Linux can do?
You should read more about Plan 9. Plan 9 isn't a reinvention of the wheel; it is something completely different. And, yes, interoperatability is quite possible with Plan 9 (even though I must admit that Plan 9 is currently a research OS, so the applications are a bit lacking). I was just using Plan 9 as an example; if I were a corporation dropping my Unix product, I would rather go one step above the competition (Plan 9) rather than a sell a complete clone of something that I have already sold (Linux).
Using a chip that is better designed for your purposes may get you more "miles per gallon" for your job. The SPARC may fit your needs if you want a very powerful workstation, the x86 may fit your needs if you want a PC. That's up to the customer to decide.
You're right, there is no such thing as too much competition. However, I still believe that Sun is better off selling SPARC machines with Solaris than x86 machines with Linux. I have a feeling that Dell would just kill Sun if Sun made that move.