Slashdot Mirror


Google Changes Privacy Policy

jemecki writes "Yahoo reports that Google has updated their privacy policy on user data collection. The new policy now explicitly states that 'Google may use personal information to display customized content and advertising, develop new services and ensure that its network continues to function.' It also adds that employees who violate the policy will be fired and prosecuted. They have also added a Cliffs Notes version of their privacy policy for those who don't want to RTFPP."

10 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. privacy smivacy by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I don't leave my house without my tinfoiled hat firmly in place, but I could care less about privacy policies. Especially those that require my signature. I will probably stop signing those, but I haven't felt like getting into it with the person who cannot see past the point that there is no point in agreeing or signing a "policy" that clearly says "I can change the rules at any time without notifying you".

    Signing something like that is ignorant in my opinion because signing something implies agreement, and agreeing to an openended and potentially radically different terms doesn't seem much like an agreement to me.

    I think that all of us should get together with a lawyer and create our own privacy statement and ask others to sign it, and not the other way around.

    1. Re:privacy smivacy by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everything online is forced agreement anyway.. It's probby Google's policy to begin data collection the first time a word is entered into their search..

      "By visiting this site, you agree to everything we want now and everything we will want in the future. This agreement is entirely legally binding because we said so and no one will ever test us on it."

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
  2. Wait... wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have a version of their privacy policy written in plain english?

    Isn't that against federal law or something?

  3. Re:Ok- I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    > > What is RTFPP?
    >
    > If you'll read the fine privacy policy, you'll get a hint.

    I read the fucking privacy policy, and it still didn't define RTFPP. WTF?

  4. Rocky Road as opposed to Slippery Slope by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't this basically what they were doing anyway? Using gathered data to better target ads? I mean they're walking the fine line now between good and evil. But I prefer honesty and that's what they're giving us in the terms. Now let's sit and watch to see if they "lose" our data like other notable companies have in the past.

    --
    I don't get it.
  5. Duh? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is this a YRO article? When Yahoo or MSN changes their privacy policy, is it covered in Slashdot?

    Google changes their privacy policy to reflect things that YOU SHOULD ALREADY KNOW.

    They track your usage and produce advertisements based on your usage. Duh. That's their whole business model people-- Google is an Advertising business first, a search engine second.

    Do you really think Google needs 5000 computers to serve a website? NO--- a signifigant number of those computers are for data crunching-- what are people viewing now, what advertisements should we show them? It's called "predictive marketing", it's a more advanced version of those stupid "Direct Marketing" advertisements you get in the mail.

  6. Re:Big Brother by ifwm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I feel this is a breach of our rights"

    What rights are you referring to? This is a SERVICE. You are free to CHOOSE not to use the service. Why do "feel" your rights are being violated by a company that you can choose not to give your business to?

  7. Re:Big Brother by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel this is a breach of our rights.

    Taking away your gun is a breach of your rights. Incarcerating you for standing on a soapbox shouting 'Bush is a Dirty Bunny Tickler' is a breach of your rights. A non-governmental entity collecting information you provide while surfing along on this Internet-thingy, that's no breach of your rights. Don't use Google. Don't surf the Internet-thingy. Use cash.

    If the government forces you to use Google, or Google develops a monopoly on whatever the hell it does in an unfair manner, then let's have this conversation again. But now, today? Ain't no rights-breachin' goin' on here.

    Now, the fact that Google seems to edge ever closer to The Dark Side (at least in the eyes of its Slashdot fanboy faithful) is certainly a daily source of amusement to me, but as for actual rights breaching? Wow. I'm not even sure they, as a corporate and not a governmental entity, are even capable of doing that.

  8. Re:Google prefetching top hit? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is a feature in Firefox of which Google takes advantage. If you're using Firefox at work, however, you should look up how to turn off prefetching. I've read about people getting canned because the first site in the search results (even though not actively clicked on) was a pr0n site that got preloaded.

  9. Re:Google prefetching top hit? by lupinstel · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who don't know, this is done by typing "about:config" in the address bar. Then filter or search for "network.prefetch-next" and set the value to false.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.