Slashdot Mirror


A Clock That Runs for 10,000 Years

Justin Blanton writes "Discover magazine is running an article about a clock designed to run accurately for 10,000 years. It's essentially a "future-proof" clock that blurs the line between art and functionality through advanced engineering. From the article: 'Everything about this clock is deeply unusual. For example, while nearly every mechanical clock made in the last millennium consists of a series of propelled gears, this one uses a stack of mechanical binary computers capable of singling out one moment in 3.65 million days. Like other clocks, this one can track seconds, hours, days, and years. Unlike any other clock, this one is being constructed to keep track of leap centuries, the orbits of the six innermost planets in our solar system, even the ultraslow wobbles of Earth's axis.'"

4 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. By the time the clock stops working in 10,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    years, Vista still won't be finished.

  2. Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Why doesnt the clock have an LCD display? It seems like they used lame tech. Sure they demonstrate some knowledge of analog mechanical computing ability .. but this ability has been around since the forties .. before the space age. We want humans of the future to know that we understood that the stars themselves are moving (ie, certain stars would no longer have the same relative positions in the sky ..example: Barnard's star is moving at 10.3 arcseconds per year against the background. We want to show we have that knowledge .. also the textures of the planets in the model including that of Saturn, triton, Mars etc. should be as detailed as possible. Evidence that we sent probes there. The moon should have a marking where Neil Armstrong landed. Heck even include a copy of Wikipedia on HD DVD in a simplified binary format without any complicated enoding scheme. Ok that may be a bit extreme. But I think that minimally the design of the clock should demonstrate the peak of the builder's knowledge and aspect of culture (ie, the use of the LCD display even though mechanical may be more easily understood). There is no reason we can't have both a mechanical display and an LCD display.

  3. I've got the same thing.... by se7en11 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've already made one of these. If you don't believe me, you're more than welcome to come back in 500 years to check it. Na nana boo boo

  4. Nitpicks a plenty: by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 0, Troll
    "designed to run for 10,000 years". Well, no. The article kinda suggests but never quite states that they don't have any idea what material is gonna work for 10,000 years. Without wearing out, corroding, sticking, galling, spalling, pitting, grooving, and all the other things time does to materials.

    And they don't have a power source either.

    And obviously even if it gets "designed", there's no way to actually test it. There will be functions that are only exercised every 4,000 years, so those parts will be mighty hard to test under realistic conditions. How do you design a mechanical flip-flop that has to sit still for 4,000 years, then flip?

    And they apparently don't have a good time reference! No atomic clock, as they tend to run out of cesium atoms after a few years. It's apparently meant to be locked to the Sun, but that's not a particularly *good* clock. Even now we have to occasionally add a leap-second to keep roughly in sync with the Sun. And locking to the Sun is problematical, as the Earths' axis precesses a bit, changing local noon on a roughly 18,000 year cycle.

    So not to put too fine a point on it, should we really be impressed by a very sketchy design, and very partial prototype, for a useless, marketless, and probably unbuildable gadget that won't tell time all that well anyway?