Slashdot Mirror


ESRB Should Stand Down?

Next Generation has a piece wondering if the ESRB should step down in favour of an independent board, to restore the faith of consumers in the game ratings system. They talk with a company that proposes just that, wanting to substitute a new system for the current model. From the article: "Profanity Sex Violence (PSV) Ratings differ from the ESRB in that they describe levels of sex, violence and profanity in games (using a traffic light system) instead of judging a game to be appropriate for a certain age."

2 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry, buddy by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, how does he propose to fund a system that is more expensive than the current system? Who pays, and how does that make his idea independent?

    Second, he decries the ESRB system as being too vague. Yes, it would be useful to rate PSV separately. But, c'mon, Red/Yellow/Green as the ranking? What is that, None, Some, a Lot? Who gets to determine where the line is between yellow and red?

    How about this: details on the cover. Ranking on a meaningful scale that at least gives us an fair idea of what's in the box.

    No matter what, I'm going to make sure I'm aware of what games my kid is playing, and what's in those games. But I'd hate to shell out $60, bring the game home, watch the kid get all excited, and then realize that it's too mature for him. Take the game away, and then go back to the store to get a refund.

    And, I'm sorry, but I don't have the time to research every game on the internet for half an hour... I'd rather spend that time interacting with my child.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  2. it's already done. by joystickgenie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well yah know, I like the idea of the rating system telling what the rating is for. Things like does the game have violence, sex, drugs use, and profanity. Wouldn't it be nice if those things are printed right on the box?

    Oh yeah they are already doing that, Right next to the one letter ESRB rating. Here let me give you a few examples:

    Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

    Mature (17+)
    Blood and Gore,
    Intense Violence,
    Strong Language,
    Strong Sexual Content,
    Use of Drugs

    The Sims 2

    Teen (13+)
    Crude Humor,
    Sexual Themes,
    Violence

    Halo 2

    Mature (17+)
    Blood and Gore,
    Violence

    God of War

    Mature (17+)
    Blood and Gore,
    Intense Violence,
    Nudity,
    Sexual Themes
    Strong Language

    This really seems like an example of people not paying attention to the rating labels. The extra description for what the title contains has been on games for a very long time now. If you want to know what is in the game read a little more then the big single letter in the rating box. Also each of these extra descriptors are already rated. That's the difference between some violence, violence, and intense violence.

    This stoplight rating system seems like it would be a step in the wrong direction. It would end up giving you less information.