Slashdot Mirror


The World's Smallest Car

starexplorer writes "Start your Nano-engines? LiveScience.com is reporting that researchers at Rice University have designed the world's smallest car that is no more than 4 nanometers across. It has a chassis, axles and a pivoting suspension. The wheels are buckyballs. Why do it? The team wants to build a fleet of nanotrucks to carry atoms and molecules around minature factories." So it's not exactly self-powered, but it rolls. It's a start!

21 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea, too small for me by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry I'm late coming home, honey. I lost the car again.

    1. Re:Good idea, too small for me by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure I can fit 19" rims onto it. And a fart pipe.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Only 4 nanometers across... by d3ac0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    And yet it still holds 10 clowns! Go figure.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  3. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is this a perfect solution for men that have really large reproductive organs?

  4. I feel humbled by chrpai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anyone else admit they feel humbled when they read things like this?

    1. Re:I feel humbled by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, no. I feel like a giant super man that can pick up a million cars with his bare hands, and knock over thousands of cars with a breath. How the hell is that humbling?

    2. Re:I feel humbled by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      Try changing the tire, super man. ;)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  5. A great day... by Aenema · · Score: 5, Funny

    for the small people that helped make such a thing possible

  6. Re:Rice U? by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Speaking of rice, where can you get Type-R stickers and spinning rims that small?

  7. yeah, but the hard part is... by bobalu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...making a really small Midas muffler shop.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  8. One question by Auckerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many microns/nanogram does it get?

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  9. I give it six months by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Till they add an SUV to the lineup.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  10. Directional Friction Reduction? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could this be used to make materials that have significantly less friction going in one direction and more going the other. The possibilities are endless. Like Bar tables that when drinks are shifted across it can move around corners. and stop right at the customer. Cool

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Compuser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who has done plenty of STM an nano work in his life,
      I can tell you two things:
      1. I do not believe they have proven the wheels roll. They think they
      have proven it but their STM work is embarassingly bad
      (for starters, clean Au-111 surface has herringbone reconstruction
      which is not seen in their images, the car is not resolved with anything
      close to atomic resolution, temperature drift is atrocious etc.)
      2. The surface of gold is very "soft" even at room temperature. Heating
      it to 100 C often is enough to restore herringbone reconstruction to
      a mechanically randomized surface. By 200 C the surface is essentially
      a liquid though gold's partial pressure is still negligible meaning
      that this liquid does not yet evaporate. Everything I see in their
      paper shows to me that the molecules do not roll, but rather diffuse
      or surf along with the surface. Certainly many buckyballs are seen
      near step edges, something that happens to all crap diffusing on the
      surface because it is energetically favorable to assemble there.

      In short, there is no evidence of science or even engineering here.
      Slashdot bought into the PR of the kind of nano project that made
      nanotechnology into a dirty word among the leading research groups
      in the area. BTW, I am not doing STM research and am not planning
      to so I am not speaking as a competitor. More like: this is why I
      moved on from nano-work, so i don't have to deal with crap-meisters
      like this.

  11. Uh huh by connah0047 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the science team going to the board of directors:

    BoD: What's the problem?
    Scientists: Well, we need to be able to move atoms and molecules around in precise ways.
    BoD: How can we help?
    Scientists: We need some funding to build little, tiny trucks to carry them around in.
    [long pause]
    BoD: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! No really guys, what did you need?

  12. Sensationalist journalism by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, there's a word for a vehicle that doesn't have an engine, or a bed, and is smaller than a car.

    It's called a wagon.

    Doesn't sound as cool, does it? But that's what it is, isn't it?

    Rechargable nanomotors that don't break - that's what we need for this kind of thing. Its the holy grail for nanotech right now.

    If you don't avoid all references to objects that move under their own power (and you're talking about nanotech), then you're sensationalizing the news. Its like saying "Fusion done in cold!" when you mean that someone built a fusion laser system in Anarctica. Obviously cold means something specific when its that close to the word "Fusion."

    Keep up the sensationalism, and you can't get the point across when you come across something that's actually fantastic.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  13. Pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a pic:

              .

    I hope they don't make the same mistake Ford made, and only offer it in black.

    -AC

  14. Better Link by sapgau · · Score: 5, Informative

    With less cookies and better pictures at Nanotechnology Now

  15. Re:It's perfect! by Muttley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is a nano-toxin? How does it differ from a toxin? In what way does the creation of a small macromolecule in the shape of a car contribute to toxicity?

    This is phobia and panic, started in the realm of GE food, and spreading, through ignorance, into the world of nanotech. Nanotech is ill defined, and literally means anything over the nano-scale. Scaremongers try to use new scary words (hence their profession), like nano-toxin, and site that nanoparticles are in things like sunscreen, aerosols...etc. Of course they are, for without TiO4 in sunscreen, it wouldn't block ultraviolet rays, and it wouldn't work. I fail to see the difference between a nano-toxin and a toxin, but regardless of what I fail to see, this kind of irrational skepticism and 'but it could be NANO-toxic!' are unhelpful, and only serve to further the divide between scientists and society. Likewise, scientists dismissing the concerns of the public also furthers this divide.

    Inform yourself, ask questions of the scientists, but don't say sarcastic unhelpful things like 'it's perfect for producing nano-toxins', without explaining how this might occur.

    --
    M.
  16. short-sightedness by UESMark · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is so typical that when developing the industrial nano-cities of the future they chose to develop nano-cars instead of a sensible atomic mass transit system. If this policy continues the consumption of nano-gas will raise nano-oil prices so high that soon we will have to invade nano-arabia. I for one will continue to endorse nano-carpooling and the use of nano-bikes whenever possible,

  17. Re:Compact car by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

    So how does this redefine the phrase COMPACT CAR?

    You mean it's not an instruction. Whoops.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."