Slashdot Mirror


Court Battle Over Internet Calls

koweja writes "The federal appeals court has is hearing a petition to overturn an FCC rule that extends current wire-tapping laws to cover VoIP calls. The petition comes from various privacy advocacy groups, including the Center for Democracy and Technology. Aside from the obvious privacy issues, the rule requires that providers use equipment that allows wiretaps, which would require many companies to "upgrade" in order to comply."

5 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. But why... by confusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...should those using VOIP be exempt from the abuses of governmental powers that the rest of us must endure?

    Jerry
    http://www.cyvin.org/

  2. I have already completed this entire thread by BOOTSTRAPS · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have finished this thread for you:

    >I hate the man. (Score: 5, Insightful)
    >>Yea but America always does this, and I don't like America. (Score:4, Interesting)
    >The Government is controlling too much stuff (Score: 4, Interesting)
    >>We can just have some private industry do it for us, then. (Score: 5, Insightful)
    >>>Why should we put up with this? (Score: 4, Interesting)
    >>>>I like to use my voip (Score 5, Interesting)
    >>>>>I can't wait to pay more taxes (Score: 4, Funny)
    >>>>>>I hate GEORGE BUSH (Score: -1, Troll)
    >>>>>>>Tehy will never stop me from making free calls. (Score: 1, Redundant)
    >I hate microsoft (Score: 1, Off-Topic)
    >I am a bad person (Score: 3, Interesting)

    _29 replies_ below your current threshold

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    Saving sig aborted.
    Reason: Your subject looks too much like ascii art
  3. Re:What good / a sample conversation by radiotyler · · Score: 3, Funny

    habib_freedom_hater01> aziz, are you ready lol
    sxy_bch_1955> hi ;) @}-'-`---
    habib_freedom_hater01> AZIZ!!! stop goofin we must destroy teh invidels
    sxy_bch_1955> ROFLMAO! OMG habib, d00d, this is so l33ts
    habib_freedom_hater01> tahts it aziz im goin to call u
    sxy_bch_1955> LOL u cant tehy tapped r phone! we only use chat now
    habib_freedom_hater01> roxors!
    sxy_bch_1955> u set us up teh bomb
    habib_freedom_hater01> move zig!
    sxy_bch_1955> LOL

    --
    hi mom!
  4. Re:I doubt encryption is the answer by pclminion · · Score: 4, Funny
    Considering the amount of overhead that would be required to encrypt and decrypt a constant data stream such as VoIP, it seems to me that you'd have pretty bad performance problems.

    Then you are ignorant. Assuming a bit rate of 32 kbps (which is generous for voice), that's 4 kilobytes of data per second that need to be encrypted.


    Oh woe is me, where oh where am I going to find an encryption algorithm that can encrypt a mighty 4 kilobytes per second? I mean sheesh, it only has a quarter of a millisecond per byte! Hell, at today's CPU speeds we'll have to encrypt a byte using fewer than half a million instructions! God, it just seems impossible!

  5. Vonage by Mister+Gas+Fireplace · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have Vonage so I guess I can continue my marijuana growing operation. Just kidding.