Slashdot Mirror


New Limits to FBI Tracking of Cell Phone Users

EvilTwinSkippy writes "According to the Washington Post (free registration), Two Federal Courts have seperately ruled that the FBI may not track the location of cell phone users without proof that a crime has been committed, or is in progress. The cases involve the FBI seeking court orders to track suspects in real-time using the mobile phone network as part of an ongoing investigation."

4 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Just turn it OFF by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    or if you're REALLY paranoid, do one or more of these:

    1. remove battery
    2. wrap in tin foil
    3. "forget it" in neighbours' car

    So if you want to commit a crime and have an alibi, AND frame someone else:

    1. leave your phone turned on at home but with the ringer off
    2. get another phone, clone the sim card of the person you want to frame
    3. just before its time to do the crime, borrow their phone to make a quick call, then TURN IT OFF!
    4. go to the location where you
      1. insert battery into cloned phone
      2. do the nasty deed
      3. make a call to your real cell phone, leave 20 sec of dead air.
      4. remove battery from cloned phone
    5. return home
    "You" have never left home. "They" were at the scene of the crime. If their phone has roaming, and it was out of their primary area, their cell bill will "prove" they were there with the call to your phone. You==alibi, them==fucked.
  2. They'll adapt the al-Qaida way by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Terrorists will simply adapt the Al-Qaida way. That is, horse-back or any primitive means. The FBI seems to think that terrorists are stupid. This is way we have failed to capture Bin Laden even after spending close to $1.3 billion in efforts to find him.

    If one writes about possible rains or a harvest or even congratulates somebody for fathering a child, yet the actual meaning behind this is a facilitation of terrorist activity, this is very dangerous. This is the Al-Qaida way. We as Americans cannot succeed in such an environment.

    That is why for example, IEDs are exploding daily, killing and maiming our GIs despite the fact that Baghdad was "combed" by coalition forces. To me, this is a wasted effort by the FBI. They should devise more effective means to deliver.

  3. Re:Oh nothing officer, just some innocent skulking by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a business owner, even if you have no criminal intent, you have way more reason to hide your tracks.

    There are so many conflicting or vague laws on the books. Now that years of your past can be discovered with a click, and jury nullification practically illegal, any future mistake might be wrangled into a harsher penalty through digging by our crazed public prosecutors.

    I've seen many innocent and honest people go to jail over an accountant's error. I've seen bail withheld in a tariff case because the distributor bought locally-made products containing 'tainted' products, and the feds dug up evidence of past sales online that MIGHT have been illegal.

    RICO, PATRIOT, Magic Lantern, EPIC and other legal tools are used hundreds of times more against non-criminals. If you're seeing slow business or are broke, dump F/OSS and help people express their fourth amendment rights. You'll never go hungry again.

  4. Re:OR.. they are a terrorist? by v1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually not true. The president (and maybe others?) has the authority to label a person or a group as "enemy combatants". At that point it does not matter WHO you are. You can be a tourist from Europe, a 4th generation Texan, or the Czar of Russia, it really does not matter. Once you are an Enemy Combatant, you are nobody. They can kill you, lock you up and throw away the key, and basically you have no rights. No right to habeus corpus (sp?), no right of attourney, no right of trial by jury, and certainly no right to a speedy trial. Your life and fredom is their whim at that point.

    Because of this, no one has guaranteed fredom or guaranteed rights in the US anymore. With those two words all your rights get taken away and you just basically don't exist anymore. There is no appeal, no review, no limits. If it happens to you, there is simply nothing anyone can do to help you. To say someone has rights, EXCEPT if someone decides they don't, means you never had any rights to begin with. Anything so easily taken away does not truly exist.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.