Student-Made Satellite Goes Into Orbit
College Student writes "A Satellite built by aerospace students from 23 university groups successfully took off from Plesetsk, in northern Russia. From the article: 'A Russian booster rocket successfully carried a satellite designed by students into a low Earth orbit yesterday for the European Space Agency under a programme intended to help to inspire and train future aerospace workers.'"
http://littonlab.atl.calpoly.edu/
The article was notibly short on details, so here is a link to one of the satellites in the launch. This was an impressive feat for the schools involved and much was learned from the process.
I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
http://sseti.gte.tuwien.ac.at/express/mop/ This is the SSETI Express team home page.
I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
In the bit of undergraduate research that I've done, I've seen people forge data regularly out of laziness. Sometimes numbers were off from what was expected, but instead of redoing a run of the experiment, they just put in what they thought it should have been. The numbers are reasonable, but still, it's lying.
Anyone else have experience on this? I'm going to assume that graduate research is better with people who are more serious and care about what they do.
Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
It fell silent after failing to separate from its booster properly http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/051028_sseti_ russiansat.html
Yes, but they didn't design and build the thing themselves, they're effectively just technicians on the project. (Before you take offense, let me note that CU-Boulder builds a lot of instruments, too, and I had friends who worked on some of them. They're getting really good experience, but they're not responsible for the entire project.)
There are other cases of student-designed/built/operated spacecraft, though: SNOE (Student Nitrous-Oxide Explorer) comes to mind. But NASA is *not* going to risk a Mars mission on students, though. It's too expensive.
It wasn't SSETI, it was the other satellite Mozhayets-5 that failed to break free from the upper stage and is missing.
s iansat.html
See here: http://space.com/missionlaunches/051028_sseti_rus
"It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
One of those 'picosatellites' is the NCUBE-2 (cue bad la^Hgamer puns.) Sadly, at the moment it seems like it's a dead duck. HAMs can help listen for it, information on the NCUBE homepage. The other satellites are reported to be communicating with ground stations.
Look a monkey!
NASA does do things like this. I'm a sophmore electrical engineering student at Utah State University and I'm helping with USU entry in the 4th University Nanosatellite Competition http://ususat.usu.edu/. Selected universities design, build, and test small satellites and the most useful and best designed gets launched at the end.
The satellite may well be in the Pacific Ocean. The ARRL is reporting the satellite went silent.
How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
NO! Please DO NOT USE THIS ADDRESS!
;-)
please use: http://www.sseti.org/express
The former address is an internal writing of the latter and *will* change during the next days as our servers are suffering from overload since three days...guess why