Slashdot Mirror


IBM Slows the Speed of Light

dptalia writes "According to an article on ZDNet, IBM has come up with a way to slow light to 1/300 of its normal speed. While this has been done in laboratories before, IBM has found out how to do this using standard materials, which opens the possibility of mass production. This means that the dream of having optical based CPUs may be closer than previously thought." From the article: "When the optical conversion might start to occur is a matter of speculation. Luxtera has said it will start to commercially produce products in 2007. The computer industry, however, tends to move slowly when it comes to major overhauls of computer architecture. Several components will have to be developed before photons can replace electrons inside computers. A paper providing details on the chip will run in Nature on Wednesday."

31 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing new by JavaNPerl · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is not new, my city has been slowing down light for years, particularly red lights they can't seem to apply the same technology to yellow or green lights though.

  2. Research Paper by pmike_bauer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Research Paper Title:
    How to Slow the Speed of Light Using Common Household Items.

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    1. Re:Research Paper by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      Research Paper Title:
      How to Slow the Speed of Light Using Common Household Items.


      by Angus MacGyver, Ph. D.

    2. Re:Research Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just attempt to pass light through an opaque object.

      Then the speed of light is zero!

  3. How about speeding it up, now by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm waiting for the day when we can raise the speed of light so we can go faster. Futurama predicted it'd be in 2508, but I'm hoping we get there sooner.

    1. Re:How about speeding it up, now by ajdowntown · · Score: 3, Funny

      me, I am waiting for "bachelor chow"

      mmm, mmm, that'll be good!

    2. Re:How about speeding it up, now by tyler083 · · Score: 1, Funny

      we can get there sooner if we avoid having our civilization destroyed TWICE by aliens.

    3. Re:How about speeding it up, now by VATechTigger · · Score: 0, Funny

      bah, what good is that without a can of slurm to wash it down.......

    4. Re:How about speeding it up, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Simple. Crossbreed a rhino with a donkey. But anyway unicorns are pink and invisible.

  4. It's been a long time by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is the best-written synopsis I have seen in a while. And posted by ZONK no less!

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
    1. Re:It's been a long time by tgd · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even a blind monkey banging on a keyboard could randomly pick a good submission once in a while!

      Everyone submit this again, and lets see in a few hours if he posts it again. That'll be the real test.

  5. Does this mean by RandoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to change the speed of light from a const to a variable now?

  6. Teenagers love slow light by mandreko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Millions of teenagers will love it if light gets slowed that much. It could give them time to zip up their pants when their mom walks in the room wondering what she heard coming from the computer.

  7. Slowing? by b100dian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet they are slowing it down to leave room for overclocking! :P

    --
    gtkaml.org
  8. Next on the to do list: by scolby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slow down the speed of a Steve Ballmer-thrown chair.

    1. Re:Next on the to do list: by C0rinthian · · Score: 3, Funny

      deeeevvvveeeellllloooopppppeeeeerrrrrrrsssssssss.. ..!

  9. Doing it easy by JonGretar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well... I guess this is one way to achieve faster than light travel. Guess it's easyer to just use the old car but slow everything else down. ;)

  10. Switching? by Hrvat · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd rather they figure out how to speed up switching. You wouldn't need to slow light down then.

    --
    TANSTAAFL
  11. Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    IBM? Hrm. I'm a little surprised -- who else would've expected Microsoft to be the industry leader in making things go slower?

  12. Experiment of the millenium by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm looking for an optical processor that can do math at point 5 lightspeed. I expect this will be of particular assistance in my thesis project of calculating how fast a certain type of falcon can run. In the past, when trying to figure this out, I've had to hold the bird with a pair of grippers that would keep slipping out of my hands, and by the time I'd be done, I would have gone through maybe nine or ten pairs.

    With a faster processor, I hope to do the Kestrel run in less than 12 forceps.

    1. Re:Experiment of the millenium by whopis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Next thing they should work on slowing is the speed at which jokes fly over your head.

  13. Re:Nature who? by harrkev · · Score: 1, Funny

    Curious, since I read about this yesterday...

    Maybe the light was slowed down so much, that I moved faster that C, and went backwards in time.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  14. The Apocalyspe Nears... by Kuad · · Score: 3, Funny

    First IBM starts offering Solaris as an OS choice. Now they've slowed the speed of light.

    Who else is waiting for a skinny guy on a pale horse to ride across the sky?

  15. Re:Bottlenecks.... by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 3, Funny
    What happens if we overclock it?!

    The light will go into ultra-violet and possibly plaid!

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  16. Good news / Bad news by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The good news is we can have processors that run at the speed of light.

    The bad news is that the speed of light is now roughly 18 miles per hour.

  17. Slowing the speed of light by thewiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    IBM has actually found two more ways to slow the speed of light:

    Subject photons to their software development process.

    Put photons through the government procurement process.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  18. Return of the "Turbo" button! by supun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now IBM can run at 1/300 speed of light for the "normal" mode and at the speed of light for the "turbo" mode!

    --
    :w!
  19. The fertile grounds for the new flame war by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Funny

    countdown to the "Speed of light performance myths", "temporal over clocking", and bootleg computer makers using the lightbulbs from easy bake ovens as processors.

  20. Re:Time is relative by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have been wondering why I don't seem to be ageing as fast, these past months. Now, Slashdot informs me that IBM has slowed down the speed of light, and this is all beginning to make sense!

    That "time is relative" comment. Boy! Truer words were never said. Waiting for the next slashdot story - the hours go by like minutes, as I hit F-5, over and over again! Then, when called into my manager's office - to discuss my productivity "problem" - just the opposite.

    Just wonderin'. Do all you guys like cheese?

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  21. Re:Nature who? by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

    A paper providing details on the chip will run in Nature on Wednesday
     
    I was thinking nevermind how the new chips run in nature, I want to know how well they'll run locked up in my server room.
     
    Chips of the wild! Coming soon to a safari near you!

  22. Just route them thru FEMA by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

    That'll slow'em down.

    I guess this also means the tollbooth trick didn't work the way it did in Rock Ridge...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."