Slashdot Mirror


Glide Effortless to Compete in File Sharing Market

Dotnaught writes "InformationWeek is running a story about a new consumer application suite called Glide Effortless that's slated to be released in mid-November. Think of it as iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iCal, Mail, document sharing, shopping, and a few other apps all in one seamless application hosted as a service on the Web that could be accessed by any browser on any computer. It allows file sharing without the risk of illegal copying. It might prove a viable competitor to iTunes, if it works as advertised and if it can scale to handle millions of users."

21 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. security concerns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... as I glide effortlessly to fp! Suck it!

  2. Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I prefer to store data on my own computer, for privacy reasons. I will not use these services for sensitive, private data, because I do not know who else has access to said data. And I see no point in using their service only for non-sensitive needs, while returning to my existing solutions for private matters.

    I doubt their service offers anything beyond what is already possible with a solid Linux or BSD setup, while costing far more and lacking the security I've come to expect.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First- what is this 'private data' that everyone is so worried about? Kiddie porn? It's not like anyone uses Quicken anymore- you can get banking info on-line. So I always wonder what the heck is so private.

      Other than that, these on-line services provide a few advantages that typical desktop apps don't.

      Portability for one. It would be nice to move around anywhere, and always have my files and applications available to me (with a net connection). Home to work, and to my mom's house for the holidays with all of my stuff available. Not that I would do any work from home, but if I had my pictures and everything else in a place that MADE SENSE then it would be great. I do NOT think it makes sense to put my files on a 'briefcase' type site, because I need to upload/download when I am working on them.

      No install - always up to date. A lot of users would really benefit from this feature. And the $5 per month fee would be a good thing in many cases. Maybe you only need it for a while. Maybe you have a seasonal business and you hire extra workers for part of the year- there could be a lot of reasons. But this would take a big load of work off of the IT people. In fact, many small businesses IT space is in such a shambles, that this would be the only way they can get it together without spending big $$$.

      With these advantages stated, I still think it would be a long time before this becomes standard operating procedure for many people. But with broadband connections becoming more prevalent (c'mon VOIP!) it will just make more and more sense for this stuff to be centralized.

      I have NEVER seen a public school that had a decent IT setup. Every computer lab I've seen has been a disaster...they would be an excellent candidate for this type of service. And if the kids can easily bring their work home, then all the better.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    2. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Financial information is the first thing that comes to mind. Anyone who is serious about investing, for instance, has a multitude of financial data that they need to store, and that often is best kept private.

      Then there is just personal correspondence that is just that: personal. I don't want other people to have easy access to letters I have sent to friends and family. For instance, I don't want others to know that my nephew James has testicular cancer, and may lose his genitals.

      You keep thinking about kiddie porn. Those of us who do not deal with such filth still do have many reasons to keep our data private. Services like these do not offer the privacy that is required, and even with their advantages, the security problems still far outweigh the benefits.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably don't lock your doors at night, either. Or lock your car door. Or have an alarm system on your car or your home. Or lock any drawers at work. Or use a passcode for your voicemail. Or a pin number for your bank account.

      I mean, nobody would care about your stuff. And with so many cars and homes and drawers and cubicles and bank accounts and voicemail accounts out there, your measely stuff will just get lost in the noise.

    4. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you don't feel the need to have confidential information please post your bank card numbers, credit card numbers, social security number, email addresses, phone numbers, work information, home address, family status and their respective addresses and phone numbers, computer logs and all other personal information. Nobody is likely to use them for anything and they will simply get lost in all the noise....

    5. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Their IT guys are not the "money-making" group, therefore they are expandable...

      Only around the middle...

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  3. Zzzz by rootedgimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this the sort of thing anyone in the /. community would use? I don't mean to troll, but aren't there already a million and a half applications that people are already familiar with / already have installed that could do the exact same thing(s)? This isn't the days of Hotline anymore. (Though it did pwn for its time... Ahh, the power of dc++)

  4. Submitter and article forgot something... by Jugalator · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Link: Glide Effortless

    Seems like they're planning one gargantuan Flash site to run it all, judging by their current introductory site and the "flashy" screenshots of their upcoming one.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  5. Bullshit by Jarnis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof'

    Will run on any browser, phone, mobile device, set top box.. and will do everything office, itunes, windows etc does... and magically solves music piracy on the sidelines by magically knowing what's legal and what's not.

    Same old story... Noname company comes out of nowhere, claims their product will cure cancer, end hunger and guarantee world peace all in one go. I call 'bullshit', until presented with real proof of the claims laid out.

    1. Re:Bullshit by Rayaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It won't compete with iTunes no matter how well it's designed, simply because it won't be able to manage the iPod.

  6. Re:OK, fine by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Does it listen out for generic beats, mixed with generic vocalizations of generic lyrics, flavoured out by massive over production?

    You know, that would work far better than a Slashdot-posted joke should...

  7. Jack of all trades... by stonedonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    The software, disclosed in mid-October, is called Glide Effortless. It's a set of 12 applications for content creation, communication, E-commerce, and sharing. The apps are Glide Photos, Glide Music, Glide Video, Glide Docs, Glide AllMedia, Glide Contacts, Glide Calendar, Glide Timeline (Glide's search engine), Glide Mail, Glide Cast (audio, text, and video conferencing), Glide Share, and Glide Shops.

    Sounds like a "jack of all trades, master of none" situation here. Purely speculative, of course, but these individual apps would take quite a long while to polish to the level of their competitors, requiring a huge staff that a start-up just wouldn't have. It would be nice to have an all-in-one, platform-agnostic, Web-accessible solution, but it reminds me too much of those multi-function printers and mobile devices where the sum is less than its parts.

    There's also the Google Mail syndrome, where people don't get on board en masse because they already have a Yahoo/MSN/whatever email address. Not only does the Glide suite have to be compelling, it has to make the user say "I need the whole thing" in the face of him or her already possessing individual programs they're already familiar with and are paying for. If I were TransMedia, I would have released demo versions of their individual apps, rather than cramming everything into one high-profile release. I think that's just asking for trouble.

  8. Ads for Nerds? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Promises are cheap. Slashvertising must be cheap too.

    Do these people have any track record? It's a startup? So I guess not.

    Why is this making news before it comes out?

    All I'm reading here are big promises on a product that a cross between .Mac/Google's offerings so- anything new to see here?

    Oh wait....

    From TFA:
    "Not only is TransMedia selling Glide to end users, it's also licensing the software to media companies [b]so they can sell it as a branded service.[/b ] As a result, companies like Comcast, Disney, SBC, and Verizon will have the opportunity to offer an integrated, monetizable service that, at first glance, look significantly more compelling than the offerings from Internet portals like AOL and Internet software services like MySpace.com."

    Gee, what I wanted, along with those Disney and eBay branded credit cards I don't have nor want.... just the corporations I trust with my personal info.

  9. Competitor to iTunes? by ForumTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply because you have all these features does not necessarily mean that you're going to be a successful competitor against products like iTunes. iTunes has been marketed so well that it has become almost synonymous with online music shopping. Without support of the major labels and strong advertising companies you simply will not be successful against a product like iTunes in the mainstream market. Furthermore, many people use iTunes as a simple player and therefore when they do feel the need to shop online for music it's just so easy for them to do so through the iTunes interface.

    Also, it seems that they're striving to have a lot of features however many sites that do this do indeed come out with many features however they don't perform any of those features exceptionally well. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but a startup company boasting this many features doesn't exactly give me a lot of confidence in the quality of all these services. This service, from what I can see, is also only available in a subscription based service model which quite frankly the majority of this market is not interested in. Their free plan also only comes with 50MB of space which is not going to persuade people to yet again switch service providers.

    Most of the features they're boasting are also fairly standard and people are not going to switch to a new service unless it offers significant benefits. For example, why would I switch to use this email service when they only give me 50MB of space and other free services give me 50 times that amount? Switching these services is also a pain in the ass for myself and everyone who communicates with me.

    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
  10. PRWeb has moved by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Its new address is www.slashdot.org.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  11. Re:OK, fine by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Storing all of your private data on a stranger's computer for a fee, remotely accessible, granting permission to scan everything you have (so clearly it's only so private to begin with, right?) for allegedly copyrighted material (who knows how they know if it's copyrighted by YOU or someone else or if you're allowed to use it or if it's just a PHOTO of Metallica when you saw them backstage)...

    Hell, what could possibly go wrong?!

  12. Online services in general. by catwh0re · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just putting your everyday apps online doesn't make it a killer service. I'd always prefer to run it locally, particularly with broadband speeds not being favourable to say editing HD footage.

    Some things work well being able to be accessed online (Mail and schedules are the best examples I can think of.)

    I feel that alot of the service components are going to go to waste with underuse.

    The era of the laptop doesn't combine well with the all-online paradigm. The most successful approach I have seen with online tools, are ones that download to your device, and sync/update when you get back to an internet connection. Simpler models of this are music download services, and video download services (rather than video streaming services.) Basically so you can carry your content with you, and back it up quickly to devices. Consumers want freedom over their data.

  13. please stop making browser based apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, they're easier to maintain on several clients, but seriously now...

    they fucking suck. Admit it, you only deliver to that platform because you're too fucking lazy or stupid to code cross-platform.

  14. Re:Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The point is what is the motivation for someone to hack into your computer and get personal information? What profit is there in personal communcations?

    Blackmail, identity theft, revenge, stalking, burglary, kidnapping. Namely, the more valuable you are, the greater the value of information about you. Doubly so if you have enemies and/or very angry and very knowledgable ex-girlfriends.

    If somebody hates you and has access to any private information about you, the chance of that information being used to hurt you is non-zero.

  15. Re:TransMedia Corp by zoips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or maybe, you know, it was /.'d. But of course that never happens to a server running on a *nix platform and Apache httpd, because those magically overcome any lack of bandwidth or lack of processing power from an unexpected surge in load. Seriously, just Shut. The. Fuck. Up.